Comuna JILAVA
Autentificare utilizatori
Numele de utilizator
*
Parola
*
Crează un cont nou
Solicitaţi o parolă nouă
Afişează
Modifică
(tab activ)
Title
*
Sumar
<p>Argumentum advert Baculum ("Argument from the Club." Also, "Argumentum ad Baculam," "Argument from Strength," "Muscular Leadership," "Non-negotiable Demands," "Hard Power," Bullying, The facility-Play, Fascism, Resolution by Force of Arms, Shock and Awe.): The fallacy of "persuasion" or "proving one is true" by force, violence, brutality, terrorism, superior energy, uncooked military would possibly, or threats of violence. E.g., "Gimmee your wallet or I'll knock your head off!" or "We've got the right proper to take your land, since we have now the big guns and you don't." Also applies to oblique types of risk. E.g., "Surrender your foolish pleasure, kneel down and accept our religion today if you don't need to burn in hell without end and ever!" A mainly discursive Argumentum ad Baculum is that of forcibly silencing opponents, ruling them "out of order," blocking, censoring or jamming their message, or just talking over them or/speaking more loudly than they do, this final a tactic significantly attributed to males in blended-gender discussions. Argumentum ad Mysteriam ("Argument from Mystery;" additionally Mystagogy.): A darkened chamber, incense, chanting or drumming, bowing and kneeling, special robes or headgear, holy rituals and massed voices reciting sacred mysteries in an unknown tongue have a quasi-hypnotic impact and may usually persuade extra strongly than any logical argument. The Puritan Reformation was in giant part a rejection of this fallacy. When used knowingly and deliberately this fallacy is particularly vicious and accounts for among the fearsome persuasive power of cults. An example of an Argumentum advert Mysteriam is the "Long ago and far Away" fallacy, the fact that details, proof, practices or arguments from historical times, distant lands and/or "exotic" cultures seem to acquire a particular gravitas or ethos merely because of their antiquity, language or origin, e.g., publicly chanting Holy Scriptures in their authentic (most often incomprehensible) historical languages, preferring the Greek, Latin, Assyrian or Old Slavonic Christian Liturgies over their vernacular versions, or using classic or newly invented Greek and Latin names for fallacies in order to support their validity. See additionally, Esoteric Knowledge. An obverse of the Argumentum advert Mysteriam is the standard Version Fallacy.</p><p>Argumentum ex Silentio (Argument from Silence): The fallacy that if available sources stay silent or current data and proof can show nothing about a given subject or query this truth in itself proves the truth of one's claim. E.g., "Science can inform us nothing about God. That proves God does not exist." Or "Science admits it will probably tell us nothing about God, so that you can't deny that God exists!" Often misused in the American justice system, where, contrary to the 5th Amendment and the authorized presumption of innocence until proven responsible, remaining silent or "taking the Fifth" is often falsely portrayed as proof of guilt. E.g., "Mr. Hixon can offer no alibi for his whereabouts the night of January 15th. This proves that he was in reality in room 331 at the Smuggler's Inn, murdering his wife with a hatchet!" In in the present day's America, choosing to stay silent within the face of a police officer's questions could make one guilty sufficient to be arrested or even shot. See additionally, Argument from Ignorance. Availability Bias (also, Attention Bias, Anchoring Bias): A fallacy of logos stemming from the pure tendency to offer undue attention and importance to information that's immediately accessible at hand, significantly the primary or final information received, and to minimize or ignore broader knowledge or wider proof that clearly exists but just isn't as easily remembered or accessed. E.g., "We know from experience that this would not work," when "experience" means the latest native try, ignoring overwhelming expertise from different places and times where it has worked and does work. Also associated is the fallacy of Hyperbole [also, Magnification, or generally Catastrophizing] the place an instantaneous instance is immediately proclaimed "the most vital in all of human historical past," or the "worst in the entire world!" This latter fallacy works extremely effectively with much less-educated audiences and those whose "entire world" may be very small indeed, audiences who "hate history" and whose historic memory spans a number of weeks at best.</p><p>The Bandwagon Fallacy (additionally, Argument from Common Sense, Argumentum advert Populum): The fallacy of arguing that as a result of "everybody," "the people," or "the majority" (or somebody in energy who has widespread backing) supposedly thinks or does one thing, it must due to this fact be true and right. E.g., "Whether there actually is giant scale voter fraud in America or not, many individuals now suppose there may be and that makes it so." Sometimes additionally consists of Lying with Statistics, e.g. "Over 75% of Americans consider that crooked Bob Hodiak is a thief, a liar and a pervert. There may not be any evidence, but for anyone with half a brain that conclusively proves that Crooked Bob should go to jail! Lock him up! Lock him up!" This is sometimes mixed with the "Argumentum ad Baculum," e.g., "Like it or not, it is time to choose sides: Are you going to get on board the bandwagon with everyone else, or get crushed underneath the wheels as it goes by?" Or in the 2017 words of former White House spokesperson Sean Spicer, ""They should either get with the program or they will go," A contemporary digital type of the Bandwagon Fallacy is the information Cascade, "in which people echo the opinions of others, often online, even when their own opinions or exposure to info contradicts that opinion. When info cascades type a sample, this sample can begin to overpower later opinions by making it seem as if a consensus already exists." (Due to Teaching Tolerance for this definition!) See also Wisdom of the group, and The massive Lie Technique. For the alternative of this fallacy see the Romantic Rebel fallacy. The big Brain/Little Brain Fallacy (additionally, the Führerprinzip; Mad Leader Disease): A not-unusual however excessive instance of the Blind Loyalty Fallacy below, in which a tyrannical boss, navy commander, or religious or cult-leader tells followers "Don't assume along with your little brains (the brain in your head), however with your Big mind (mine)." This last is generally expressed in constructive phrases, i.e., "You don't have to fret and stress out in regards to the rightness or wrongness of what you might be doing since I, the Leader. am assuming all ethical and legal duty for all your actions. So lengthy as you are faithfully following orders without query I'll defend you and gladly settle for all the consequences up to and including eternal damnation if I'm fallacious." The other of this is the fallacy of "Plausible Deniability." See additionally, "Just Do It!", and "Gaslighting." The large "But" Fallacy (additionally, Special Pleading): The fallacy of enunciating a generally-accepted principle and then immediately negating it with a "however." Often this takes the form of the "Special Case," which is supposedly exempt from the same old rules of law, logic, morality, ethics or even credibility E.g., "As Americans we now have always believed on precept that every human being has God-given, inalienable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, together with in the case of criminal accusations a good and speedy trial before a jury of 1's peers. But, your crime was so unspeakable and a trial would be so problematic for nationwide security that it justifies locking you up for life in Guantanamo without trial, conviction or risk of attraction." Or, "Yes, Honey, I still love you greater than life itself, and I do know that in my marriage ceremony vows I promised earlier than God that I'd forsake all others and be faithful to you 'till loss of life do us half,' but you might have to know, this was a particular case..." See also, "Shopping Hungry," and "We Have to do Something!" The large Lie Technique (additionally the Bold Faced Lie; "Staying on Message."): The contemporary fallacy of repeating a lie, fallacy, slogan, talking-level, nonsense-assertion or misleading half-truth over and over in several kinds (significantly within the media) till it turns into part of every day discourse and folks accept it without additional proof or evidence. Sometimes the bolder and extra outlandish the big Lie becomes the more credible it seems to a willing, most frequently angry audience. E.g., "What in regards to the Jewish Problem?" Note that when this particular phony debate was happening there was no "Jewish Problem," only a Nazi Problem, however hardly anyone in energy recognized or wished to talk about that, while far too many unusual Germans had been only too ready to find a handy scapegoat to blame for his or her suffering throughout the great Depression. Writer Miles J. Brewer expertly demolishes The large Lie Technique in his basic (1930) brief story, "The Gostak and the Doshes." However, extra contemporary examples of the large Lie fallacy may be the fully fictitious August 4, 1964 "Tonkin Gulf Incident" concocted below Lyndon Johnson as a false justification for escalating the Vietnam War, or the non-existent "Weapons of Mass Destruction" in Iraq (conveniently abbreviated "WMD's" in an effort to lend this Big Lie a legitimizing, army-sounding "Alphabet Soup" ethos), used in 2003 as a false justification for the Second Gulf War. The November, 2016 U.S. President-elect's assertion that "tens of millions" of ineligible votes were forged in that 12 months's American. presidential election seems to be a basic Big Lie. See also, Alternative Truth; The Bandwagon Fallacy, the Straw Man, Alphabet Soup, and Propaganda. Blind Loyalty (additionally Blind Obedience, Unthinking Obedience, the "Team Player" enchantment, the Nuremberg Defense): The dangerous fallacy that an argument or action is correct merely and solely because a respected chief or supply (a President, professional, one’s parents, one's own "aspect," workforce or country, one’s boss or commanding officers) says it is correct. That is over-reliance on authority, a gravely corrupted argument from ethos that puts loyalty above fact, above one's personal motive and above conscience. In this case a person makes an attempt to justify incorrect, stupid or criminal conduct by whining "That's what I used to be told to do," or "I was simply following orders." See additionally, The big Brain/Little Brain Fallacy, and The "Soldiers' Honor" Fallacy. Blood is Thicker than Water (additionally Favoritism; Compadrismo; "For my buddies, anything."): The reverse of the "Ad Hominem" fallacy, a corrupt argument from ethos where a press release, argument or motion is robotically thought to be true, right and above problem as a result of one is said to, knows and likes, or is on the identical staff or side, or belongs to the same religion, occasion, club or fraternity as the person concerned. (E.g., "My brother-in-legislation says he noticed you goofing off on the job. You're a tough worker however who am I going to consider, you or him? You're fired!") See additionally the Identity Fallacy. Brainwashing (also, Propaganda, "Radicalization."): The Cold War-period fantasy that an enemy can instantly win over or "radicalize" an unsuspecting audience with their vile however one way or the other unspeakably persuasive "propaganda," e.g., "Don't take a look at that website! They're attempting to brainwash you with their propaganda!" Historically, "brainwashing" refers more correctly to the inhuman Argumentum ad Baculum of "beating an argument into" a prisoner by way of a mix of ache, worry, sensory or sleep deprivation, extended abuse and refined psychological manipulation (also, the "Stockholm Syndrome."). Such "brainwashing" will also be accomplished by pleasure ("Love Bombing,"); e.g., "Did you want that? I do know you did. Well, there's lots extra the place that got here from once you signal on with us!" (See also, "Bribery.") An unspeakably sinister form of persuasion by brainwashing includes deliberately addicting a person to medication after which offering or withholding the substance depending on the addict's compliance. Note: Only the other facet brainwashes. "We" by no means brainwash. Bribery (additionally, Material Persuasion, Material Incentive, Financial Incentive). The fallacy of "persuasion" by bribery, gifts or favors is the reverse of the Argumentum ad Baculum. As is well known, someone who's persuaded by bribery hardly ever "stays persuaded" in the long term until the bribes keep on coming in and rising with time. See also Appeasement. Calling "Cards": A contemporary fallacy of logos, arbitrarily and falsely dismissing acquainted or simply-anticipated however legitimate, reasoned objections to one's standpoint with a wave of the hand, as mere "playing cards" in some kind of "game" of rhetoric, e.g. "Don't try to play the 'Race Card' towards me," or "She's taking part in the 'Woman Card' again," or "That 'Hitler Card' won't rating with me in this argument." See also, The Taboo, and Political Correctness. Circular Reasoning (additionally, The Vicious Circle; Catch 22, Begging the Question, Circulus in Probando): A fallacy of logos where A is because of B, and B is because of A, e.g., "You cannot get a job without experience, and you cannot get expertise and not using a job." Also refers to falsely arguing that something is true by repeating the identical statement in several phrases. E.g., "The witchcraft downside is essentially the most urgent spiritual crisis on the earth at present. Why? Because witches threaten our very eternal salvation." A corrupt argument from logos. See also the "Big Lie method." The Complex Question: The contemporary fallacy of demanding a direct answer to a question that cannot be answered with out first analyzing or difficult the premise of the query itself. E.g., "Just reply me 'yes' or 'no': Did you assume you could possibly get away with plagiarism and not undergo the results?" Or, "Why did you rob that financial institution?" Also applies to conditions where one is pressured to either settle for or reject advanced standpoints or propositions containing each acceptable and unacceptable elements. A corruption of the argument from logos. A counterpart of Either/Or Reasoning. Confirmation Bias: A fallacy of logos, the widespread tendency to note, search out, select and share evidence that confirms one's personal standpoint and beliefs, as opposed to opposite evidence. This fallacy is how "fortune tellers" work--If I am advised I'll meet a "tall, dark stranger" I will be on the lookout for a tall, dark stranger, and when i meet somebody even marginally meeting that description I'll marvel on the correctness of the "psychic's" prediction. In contemporary times Confirmation Bias is most frequently seen in the tendency of assorted audiences to "curate their political environments, subsisting on one-sided information diets and [even] selecting into politically homogeneous neighborhoods" (Michael A. Neblo et al., 2017, Science magazine). Confirmation Bias (additionally, Homophily) means that people are inclined to search out and comply with solely those media shops that confirm their common ideological and cultural biases, typically to an degree that leads a the false (implicit or even specific) conclusion that "everyone" agrees with that bias and that anybody who doesn't is "loopy," "looney," evil and even "radicalized." See additionally, "Half Truth," and "Defensiveness." Cost Bias: A fallacy of ethos (that of a product), the truth that one thing expensive (either in terms of money, or one thing that is "arduous fought" or "arduous gained" or for which one "paid dearly") is generally valued more highly than something obtained free or cheaply, whatever the item's real quality, utility or true value to the purchaser. E. g., "Hey, I labored arduous to get this car! It could also be nothing but a clunker that cannot make it up a steep hill, but it's mine, and to me it's better than some millionaire's limo." Also applies to judging the standard of a consumer merchandise (or even of its proprietor!) primarily by the merchandise's brand, worth, label or source, e.g., "Hey, you there within the Jay-Mart swimsuit! Har-har!" or, "Ooh, she's driving a Mercedes!" Default Bias: (additionally, Normalization of Evil, "Deal with it;" "If it ain't broke, don't repair it;" Acquiescence; "Making one's peace with the state of affairs;" "Get used to it;" "Whatever is, is true;" "It is what it is;" "Let it's, let or not it's;" "This is the better of all attainable worlds [or, the one possible world];" "Better the satan you realize than the satan you don't."): The logical fallacy of automatically favoring or accepting a situation simply because it exists proper now, and arguing that any other different is mad, unthinkable, unimaginable, or at least would take too much effort, expense, stress or danger to alter. The opposite of this fallacy is that of Nihilism ("Tear it all down!"), blindly rejecting what exists in favor of what might be, the adolescent fantasy of romanticizing anarchy, chaos (an ideology generally referred to as political "Chaos Theory"), disorder, "permanent revolution," or change for change's sake. Defensiveness (additionally, Choice-support Bias: Myside Bias): A fallacy of ethos (one's personal), through which after one has taken a given decision, dedication or course of action, one mechanically tends to defend that decision and to irrationally dismiss opposing choices even when one's decision later on proves to be shaky or flawed. E.g., "Yeah, I voted for Snith. Sure, he turned out to be a crook and a liar and he acquired us into struggle, but I still say that at that time he was better than the out there alternate options!" See also "Argument from Inertia" and "Confirmation Bias." Deliberate Ignorance: (also, Closed-mindedness; "I don't desire to hear it!"; Motivated Ignorance; Tuning Out; Hear No Evil, See No Evil, Speak No Evil [The Three Monkeys' Fallacy]): As described by creator and commentator Brian Resnik on Vox.com (2017), that is the fallacy of merely choosing not to pay attention, "tuning out" or turning off any information, proof or arguments that problem one's beliefs, ideology, standpoint, or peace of mind, following the popular humorous dictum: "Don't attempt to confuse me with the details; my thoughts is made up!" This seemingly innocuous fallacy has enabled essentially the most vicious tyrannies and abuses over history, and continues to do so right now. See also Trust your Gut, Confirmation Bias, The Third Person Effect, "They're All Crooks," the Simpleton's Fallacy, and The Positive Thinking Fallacy. Diminished Responsibility: The common contemporary fallacy of making use of a specialized judicial idea (that criminal punishment should be much less if one's judgment was impaired) to reality on the whole. E.g., "You can't rely me absent on Monday--I was hung over and couldn't come to class so it's not my fault." Or, "Yeah, I was dashing on the freeway and killed a guy, however I used to be buzzed out of my thoughts and did not know what I used to be doing so it did not matter that much." In reality the demise does matter very a lot to the victim, to his household and friends and to society usually. Whether the perpetrator was high or not does not matter in any respect since the material outcomes are the same. This also consists of the fallacy of Panic, a quite common contemporary fallacy that one's phrases or actions, no matter how damaging or evil, by some means do not "rely" as a result of "I panicked!" This fallacy is rooted within the confusion of "penalties" with "punishment." See also "Venting." Disciplinary Blinders: A very common contemporary scholarly or skilled fallacy of ethos (that of one's self-discipline, career or educational discipline), routinely disregarding, discounting or ignoring a priori in any other case-relevant analysis, arguments and evidence that come from exterior one's own professional discipline, discourse neighborhood or educational space of examine. E.g., "That is perhaps relevant or not, but it is so not what we're doing in our area proper now." See additionally, "Star Power" and "Two Truths." An analogous fallacy is that of Denominational Blinders, arbitrarily ignoring or waving aside with out critical consideration any arguments or dialogue about faith, morality, ethics, spirituality, the Divine or the afterlife that come from outdoors one's own particular religious denomination or religion tradition. Dog-Whistle Politics: An extreme version of reductionism and sloganeering in the general public sphere, a contemporary fallacy of logos and pathos wherein a brief phrase or slogan of the hour, e.g., "Abortion," "The 1%," "9/11," "Zionism,""Chain Migration," "Islamic Terrorism," "Fascism," "Communism," "Big government," "Taco trucks!", "Tax and tax and spend and spend," "Gun violence," "Gun control," "Freedom of selection," "Lock 'em up,", "Amnesty," and many others. is flung out as "pink meat" or "chum in the water" that reflexively sends one's viewers right into a snapping, foaming-at-the-mouth feeding-frenzy. Any reasoned try to more clearly determine, deconstruct or problem an opponent's "canine whistle" enchantment leads to puzzled confusion at greatest and wild, irrational fury at worst. "Dog whistles" differ extensively in several locations, moments and cultural milieux, and they alter and lose or acquire energy so rapidly that even latest historic texts typically become extraordinarily troublesome to interpret. A common however unhappy instance of the fallacy of Dog Whistle Politics is that of candidate "debaters" of differing political shades simply blowing a succession of discursive "canine whistles" at their viewers as a substitute of addressing, refuting or even bothering to listen to one another's arguments, a state of affairs resulting in contemporary (2017) allegations that the political Right and Left in America are talking "different languages" when they're simply blowing different "dog whistles." See also, Reductionism.. The "Draw Your own Conclusion" Fallacy (also the Non-argument Argument; Let the Facts Speak for Themselves). In this fallacy of logos an in any other case uninformed viewers is introduced with carefully chosen and groomed, "shocking information" and then prompted to instantly "draw their own conclusions." E.g., "Crime rates are greater than twice as high amongst center-class Patzinaks than amongst any other comparable population group--draw your personal conclusions." It's well-known that these who're allowed to "come to their very own conclusions" are usually much more strongly convinced than these who are given both proof and conclusion up entrance. However, Dr. William Lorimer points out that "The only rational response to the non-argument is 'So what?' i.e. 'What do you assume you have proved, and why/how do you think you've proved it?'" Closely associated (if not similar) to this is the nicely-identified "Leading the Witness" Fallacy, the place a sham, sarcastic or biased question is asked solely in order to evoke a desired answer. The Dunning-Kruger Effect: A cognitive bias that leads folks of restricted abilities or knowledge to mistakenly imagine their abilities are better than they really are. (Because of Teaching Tolerance for this definition!) E.g., "I do know Washington was the Father of His Country and never told a lie, Pocahontas was the primary Native American, Lincoln freed the slaves, Hitler murdered six million Jews, Susan B. Anthony gained equal rights for girls, and Martin Luther King said "I've a dream!" Moses parted the Red Sea, Caesar stated "Et tu, Brute?" and the one cause America didn't win the Vietnam War hands-down like we at all times do was as a result of they tied our generals' fingers and the politicians reduce and run. See? Why do I must take a historical past course? I know every part about historical past!" E" for Effort. (also Noble Effort; I'm Trying My Best; The Lost Cause): The widespread contemporary fallacy of ethos that one thing should be right, true, helpful, or worthy of respect and honor solely as a result of one (or another person) has put so much honest good-religion effort and even sacrifice and bloodshed into it. (See additionally Appeal to Pity; Argument from Inertia; Heroes All; or Sob Story). An excessive example of this fallacy is Waving the Bloody Shirt (also, the "Blood of the Martyrs" Fallacy), the fallacy that a trigger or argument, irrespective of how questionable or reprehensible, cannot be questioned without dishonoring the blood and sacrifice of those that died so nobly for that trigger. E.g., "Defend the patriotic gore / That flecked the streets of Baltimore..." (from the official Maryland State Song). See additionally Cost Bias, The Soldier's Honor Fallacy, and the Argument from Inertia. Either/Or Reasoning: (also False Dilemma, All or Nothing Thinking; False Dichotomy, Black/White Fallacy, False Binary): A fallacy of logos that falsely affords solely two potential options regardless that a broad range of possible alternate options, variations and combinations are all the time readily accessible. E.g., "Either you are 100% Simon Straightarrow or you might be as queer as a 3 dollar invoice--it is as simple as that and there's no middle ground!" Or, "Either you’re in with us all the best way or you’re a hostile and must be destroyed! What's it gonna be?" Or, if your performance is anything wanting excellent, you consider your self an abject failure. Also applies to falsely contrasting one option or case to a different that is not likely opposed, e.g., falsely opposing "Black Lives Matter" to "Blue Lives Matter" when in actual fact not just a few police officers are themselves African American, and African Americans and police should not (or ought to not be!) pure enemies. Or, falsely posing a selection of both helping needy American veterans or helping needy international refugees, when the truth is in as we speak's United States there are ample assets available to easily do each ought to we care to take action. See additionally, Overgeneralization. Equivocation: The fallacy of intentionally failing to outline one's phrases, or knowingly and intentionally using phrases in a unique sense than the one the audience will understand. (E.g., President Bill Clinton stating that he did not have sexual relations with "that lady," meaning no sexual penetration, knowing full nicely that the audience will perceive his assertion as "I had no sexual contact of any form with that girl.") This can be a corruption of the argument from logos, and a tactic usually used in American jurisprudence. Historically, this referred to a tactic used in the course of the Reformation-period religious wars in Europe, when folks had been pressured to swear loyalty to at least one or another aspect and did as demanded via "equivocation," i.e., "After i solemnly swore true religion and allegiance to the King I actually meant to King Jesus, King of Kings, and to not the evil usurper squatting on the throne at the moment." This latter type of fallacy is excessively rare in the present day when the swearing of oaths has turn out to be effectively meaningless besides as obscenity or as speech formally subject to perjury penalties in authorized or judicial settings. The Eschatological Fallacy: The historic fallacy of arguing, "This world is coming to an end, so..." Popularly refuted by the observation that "Since the world is coming to an finish you will not want your life savings anyhow, so why not give it all to me?" Esoteric Knowledge (also Esoteric Wisdom; Gnosticism; Inner Truth; the Inner Sanctum; Have to Know): A fallacy from logos and ethos, that there is some knowledge reserved just for the Wise, the Holy or the Enlightened, (or these with proper Security Clearance), issues that the lots can not understand and do not deserve to know, at the least not till they turn into wiser, more trusted or extra "spiritually superior." The counterpart of this fallacy is that of Obscurantism (additionally Obscurationism, or Willful Ignorance), that (nearly always stated in a basso profundo voice) "There are some things that we mere mortals should by no means search to know!" E.g., "Scientific experiments that violate the privacy of the marital bed and expose the deep and private mysteries of human sexual habits to the tough gentle of science are obscene, sinful and morally evil. There are some things that we as people are merely not meant to know!" For the alternative of this latter, see the "Plain Truth Fallacy." See additionally, Argumentum advert Mysteriam. Essentializing: A fallacy of logos that proposes an individual or thing "is what it's and that’s all that it's," and at its core will always be the way in which it is correct now (E.g., "All terrorists are monsters, and can nonetheless be terrorist monsters even if they stay to be 100," or "'The poor you will always have with you,' so any effort to eliminate poverty is pointless."). Also refers to the fallacy of arguing that one thing is a certain method "by nature," an empty claim that no quantity of proof can refute. (E.g., "Americans are chilly and greedy by nature," or "Women are naturally better cooks than men.") See also "Default Bias." The other of this is Relativizing, the usually postmodern fallacy of blithely dismissing any and all arguments towards one's standpoint by shrugging one's shoulders and responding " Whatever..., I do not really feel like arguing about it;" "All of it relies upon...;" "That's your opinion; all the things's relative;" or falsely invoking Einstein's Theory of Relativity, Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle, Quantum Weirdness or the speculation of Multiple Universes to be able to confuse, mystify or "refute" an opponent. See additionally, "Red Herring" and "Appeal to Nature." The Etymological Fallacy: (additionally, "The Underlying Meaning"): A fallacy of logos, drawing false conclusions from the (most frequently long-forgotten) linguistic origins of a present phrase, or the alleged meanings or associations of that word in another language. E.g., "As utilized in physics, electronics and electrical engineering the term 'hysteresis' is grossly sexist because it originally got here from the Greek phrase for 'uterus' or 'womb.'" Or, "I refuse to eat fish! Don't you already know that the French word for "fish" is 'poisson,' which looks simply like the English phrase 'poison'? And doesn't that counsel something to you?" Famously, postmodern philosopher Jacques Derrida performed on this fallacy at nice size in his (1968) "Plato's Pharmacy." The Excluded Middle: A corrupted argument from logos that proposes that since a little of one thing is sweet, more must be higher (or that if less of one thing is good, none at all is even better). E.g., "If eating an apple a day is nice for you, consuming an all-apple diet is even better!" or "If a low fats food plan prolongs your life, a no-fat diet should make you live without end!" An reverse of this fallacy is that of Excluded Outliers, where one arbitrarily discards proof, examples or results that disprove one's standpoint by simply describing them as "Weird," "Outliers," or "Atypical." See also, "The big 'But' Fallacy." Also opposite is the Middle of the Road Fallacy (additionally, Falacia advert Temperantiam; "The Politics of the center;" Marginalization of the Adversary), where one demonstrates the "reasonableness" of one's personal standpoint (irrespective of how extreme) not by itself merits, but solely or primarily by presenting it as the one "average" path amongst two or more clearly unacceptable extreme alternatives. E.g., anti-Communist scholar Charles Roig (1979) notes that Vladimir Lenin efficiently argued for Bolshevism in Russia as the only available "reasonable" middle path between bomb-throwing Nihilist terrorists on the ultra-left and a corrupt and hated Czarist autocracy on the suitable. As Texas politician and humorist Jim Hightower famously declares in an undated quote, "The middle of the road is for yellow traces and lifeless armadillos." The "F-Bomb" (additionally Cursing; Obscenity; Profanity). An adolescent fallacy of pathos, trying to defend or strengthen one's argument with gratuitous, unrelated sexual, obscene, vulgar, crude or profane language when such language does nothing to make an argument stronger, apart from perhaps to create a way of identification with certain younger male "city" audiences. This fallacy additionally contains adding gratuitous sex scenes or "adult" language to an otherwise unrelated novel or movie, sometimes simply to avoid the dreaded "G" score. Related to this fallacy is the Salacious Fallacy, falsely attracting consideration to and thus potential agreement with one's argument by inappropriately sexualizing it, particularly connecting it to some type of intercourse that's perceived as deviant, perverted or prohibited (E.g., Arguing in opposition to Bill Clinton's presidential legacy by persevering with to wave Monica's Blue Dress, or in opposition to Donald Trump's presidency by obsessively highlighting his past boasting about genital groping). Historically, this dangerous fallacy was deeply implicated with the crime of lynching, through which false, racist accusations towards a Black or minority victim were virtually at all times salacious in nature and the sensation involved was efficiently used to whip up public emotion to a murderous pitch. See also, Red Herring. The False Analogy: The fallacy of incorrectly comparing one thing to another so as to attract a false conclusion. E.g., "Similar to an alley cat must prowl, a traditional adult can’t be tied down to 1 single lover." The alternative of this fallacy is the Sui Generis Fallacy (also, Differance), a postmodern stance that rejects the validity of analogy and of inductive reasoning altogether as a result of any given particular person, place, factor or idea underneath consideration is "sui generis" i.e., different and distinctive, in a class unto itself. Finish the Job: The harmful contemporary fallacy, often geared toward a lesser-educated or working class viewers, that an action or standpoint (or the continuation of that action or standpoint) may not be questioned or discussed because there is "a job to be achieved" or finished, falsely assuming "jobs" are meaningless however by no means to be questioned. Sometimes these involved internalize ("buy into") the "job" and make the task a part of their very own ethos. (E.g., "Ours is to not reason why / Ours is but to do or die.") Related to that is the "Just a Job" fallacy. (E.g., "How can torturers stand to take a look at themselves in the mirror? But I suppose it is Ok as a result of for them it is only a job like some other, the job that they get paid to do.") See additionally "Blind Loyalty," "The Soldiers' Honor Fallacy" and the "Argument from Inertia."<br> The Free Speech Fallacy: The infantile fallacy of responding to challenges to at least one's statements and standpoints by whining, "It is a free nation, isn't it? I can say anything I wish to!" A contemporary case of this fallacy is the "Safe Space," or "Safe Place," where it's not allowed to refute, problem or even talk about another's beliefs because that is likely to be too uncomfortable or "triggery" for emotionally fragile people. E.g., "All I advised him was, 'Jesus loves the little youngsters,' however then he turned around and requested me 'But what about birth defects?' That's mean. I feel I'll cry!" Prof. Bill Hart Davidson (2017) notes that "Ironically, the most strident requires 'security' come from those that want us to problem protections for discredited concepts. Things that science doesn't help AND which have destroyed lives - issues like the inherent superiority of 1 race over another. Those ideas wither below calls for for evidence. They *are* unwelcome. But let's be clear: they're unwelcome because they have not survived the problem of scrutiny." Ironically, in contemporary America "free speech" has usually change into shorthand for freedom of racist, offensive or even neo-Nazi expression, ideological tendencies that when in energy sometimes quash free speech. Additionally, a recent (2017) scientific study has discovered that, in truth, "folks assume harder and produce better political arguments when their views are challenged" and not artificially protected without problem. The elemental Attribution Error (also, Self Justification): A corrupt argument from ethos, this fallacy happens on account of observing and comparing conduct. "You assume that the bad behavior of others is caused by character flaws and foul dispositions whereas your habits is defined by the surroundings. So, for example, I rise up in the morning at 10 a.m. I say it is as a result of my neighbors get together till 2 within the morning (scenario) but I say that the explanation why you do it is that you're lazy. Interestingly, it's extra frequent in individualistic societies the place we value self volition. Collectivist societies are likely to look on the atmosphere extra. (It happens there, too, but it surely is way less widespread.)" [Due to scholar Joel Sax for this!] The obverse of this fallacy is Self Deprecation (additionally Self Debasement), the place, out of both a false humility or a genuine lack of self-esteem, one deliberately places oneself down, most often in hopes of attracting denials, gratifying compliments and reward.</p><p>Gaslighting: A recently-outstanding, vicious fallacy of logic, denying or invalidating a person's personal data and experiences by intentionally twisting or distorting known facts, reminiscences, scenes, events and evidence in an effort to disorient a vulnerable opponent and to make him or her doubt his/her sanity. E.g., "Who're you going to imagine? Me, or your own eyes?" Or, "You declare you discovered me in mattress along with her? Think once more! You're crazy! You critically have to see a shrink." A quite common, though merciless instance of Gaslighting that seems to have been particularly familiar amongst mid-20th century generations is the fallacy of Emotional Invalidation, questioning, after the very fact, the fact or "validity" of affective states, both one other's or one's personal. E.g., "Sure, I made it occur from starting to end, however nevertheless it wasn't me doing it, it was simply my silly hormones betraying me." Or, "You did not really imply it when you said you 'hate' Mommy. Now take a time-out and you'll feel higher." Or, "No, you're not really in love; it's simply infatuation or 'puppy love.'" The fallacy of "Gaslighting" is named after British playwright Patrick Hamilton's 1938 stage play "Gas Light," also called "Angel Street." See also, Blind Loyalty, "The large Brain/Little Brain Fallacy," The Affective Fallacy, and "Alternative Truth." Guilt by Association: The fallacy of attempting to refute or condemn someone's standpoint, arguments or actions by evoking the detrimental ethos of those with whom the speaker is recognized or of a group, party, religion or race to which he or she belongs or was as soon as related to. A type of Ad Hominem Argument, e.g., "Don't hearken to her. She's a Republican so you can't belief something she says," or "Are you or have you ever been a member of the Communist Party?" An extreme instance of that is the Machiavellian "For my enemies, nothing" Fallacy, where actual or perceived "enemies" are by definition always flawed and must be conceded nothing, not even the time of day, e.g., "He's a Republican, so even when he stated the sky is blue I wouldn't believe him." The Half Truth (additionally Card Stacking, Stacking the Deck, Incomplete Information): A corrupt argument from logos, the fallacy of consciously selecting, collecting and sharing only that proof that supports one's personal standpoint, telling the strict reality however deliberately minimizing or omitting important key details with a view to falsify the bigger image and help a false conclusion.(E.g. "The reality is that Bangladesh is one of the world's quickest-rising international locations and might boast of a younger, ambitious and laborious-working inhabitants, a household-positive tradition, a delightful, warm climate of tropical beaches and swaying palms where it never snows, low price medical and dental care, a vibrant faith tradition and a large number of locations of worship, an exquisite, world-class spicy native curry delicacies and a swinging entertainment scene. Taken together, all these solid details clearly prove that Bangladesh is one of the world’s most fascinating locations for young households to live, work and raise a household.") See additionally, Confirmation Bias. Hero-Busting (also, "The proper is the Enemy of the good"): A postmodern fallacy of ethos underneath which, since nothing and nobody in this world is ideal there are usually not and have by no means been any heroes: Washington and Jefferson held slaves, Lincoln was (by our contemporary standards) a racist, Karl Marx sexually exploited his household's personal young dwell-in home worker and got her pregnant, Martin Luther King Jr. had an eye fixed for women too, Lenin condemned feminism, the Mahatma drank his own urine (ugh!), Pope Francis is improper on abortion, capitalism, same-sex marriage and ladies's ordination, Mother Teresa beloved suffering and was improper on nearly the whole lot else too, and so forth., and many others Also applies to the now close to-universal political tactic of ransacking everything an opponent has said, written or achieved since infancy in order to seek out something to misinterpret or condemn (and we all have something!). An early example of this latter tactic is deftly described in Robert Penn Warren's basic (1946) novel, All of the King's Men. This is the alternative of the "Heroes All" fallacy, beneath. The "Hero Busting" fallacy has also been selectively employed on the service of the Identity Fallacy (see under) to falsely "show" that "you can't trust anybody" but a member of "our" id-group since everybody else, even the so-known as "heroes" or "allies" of other groups, are all racist, sexist, anti-Semitic, or hate "us." E.g., In 1862 Abraham Lincoln mentioned he was keen to settle the U.S. Civil War either with or with out freeing the slaves if it would preserve the Union, thus "conclusively proving" that all whites are viciously racist at coronary heart and that African Americans should do for self and never trust any of "them," not even those who declare to be allies. Heroes All (additionally, "Everybody's a Winner"): The contemporary fallacy that everyone seems to be above common or extraordinary. A corrupted argument from pathos (not wanting anyone to lose or to feel unhealthy). Thus, every member of the Armed Services, past or current, who serves honorably is a nationwide hero, each scholar who competes within the Science Fair wins a ribbon or trophy, and every racer is awarded a winner's yellow jersey. This corruption of the argument from pathos, a lot ridiculed by disgraced American humorist Garrison Keeler, ignores the fact that if all people wins nobody wins, and if everyone's a hero nobody's a hero. The logical result of this fallacy is that, as kids's writer Alice Childress writes (1973), "A hero ain't nothing but a sandwich." See additionally the "Soldiers' Honor Fallacy." Hoyle's Fallacy: A fallacy of logos, falsely assuming that a doable occasion of low (even vanishingly low) probability can by no means have occurred and/or would never happen in real life. E.g., "The chance of something as advanced as human DNA emerging by purely random evolution within the time the earth has existed is so negligible that it is for all sensible functions impossible and will need to have required divine intervention." Or, "The chance of a informal, Saturday-night poker player being dealt four aces off an honest, shuffled deck is so infinitesimal that it might never happen even as soon as in a traditional lifetime! That proves you cheated!" See also, Argument from Incredulity. An obverse of Hoyle's Fallacy is "You Can't Win if You do not Play," (additionally, "Someone's gonna win and it'd as nicely be YOU!") a standard and cruel contemporary fallacy used to persuade weak audiences, significantly the poor, the mathematically illiterate and playing addicts to throw their money away on lotteries, horse races, casinos and different long-shot playing schemes. I Wish I Had a Magic Wand: The fallacy of regretfully (and falsely) proclaiming oneself powerless to change a foul or objectionable situation over which one has energy. E.g., "What can we do about gasoline costs? As Secretary of Energy I want I had a magic wand, however I don't" [shrug] . Or, "No, you can't stop piano lessons. I wish I had a magic wand and will teach you piano overnight, however I don't, so prefer it or not, it's important to keep on working towards." The father or mother, after all, ignores the possibility that the youngster could not want or have to study piano. See also, TINA. The Identity Fallacy (additionally Identity Politics; "Die away, ye previous forms and logic!"): A corrupt postmodern argument from ethos, a variant on the Argumentum advert Hominem wherein the validity of one's logic, evidence, experience or arguments relies upon not on their very own energy but fairly on whether the one arguing is a member of a given social class, technology, nationality, religious or ethnic group, color, gender or sexual orientation, profession, occupation or subgroup. On this fallacy, legitimate opposing evidence and arguments are brushed aside or "othered" without comment or consideration, as merely not price arguing about solely because of the lack of proper background or ethos of the particular person making the argument, or as a result of the one arguing does not self-establish as a member of the "in-group." E.g., "You'd understand me right away if you had been Burmese but since you are not there isn't any method I can clarify it to you," or "Nobody but one other nurse can know what a nurse has to go through." Identity fallacies are strengthened by common ritual, language, and discourse. However, these fallacies are sometimes self-involved, pushed by the egotistical ambitions of academics, politicians and would-be group leaders anxious to build their own careers by carving out a particular id group constituency to the exclusion of existing broader-based mostly identities and leadership. An Identity Fallacy may result in scorn or rejection of doubtlessly helpful allies, actual or potential, as a result of they don't seem to be of one's own id. The Identity Fallacy promotes an exclusivist, typically cultish "do for self" philosophy which in at present's world just about guarantees self-marginalization and final defeat. A latest application of the Identity Fallacy is the fallacious accusation of "Cultural Appropriation," in which those that are not of the appropriate Identity are condemned for "appropriating" the delicacies, clothes, language or music of a marginalized group, forgetting the previous axiom that "Imitation is the sincerest type of flattery." Accusations of Cultural Appropriation fairly often stem from competing egocentric financial interests (E.g., "What right do these p*nche Gringos need to set up a taco place right here on Guadalupe Drive to remove enterprise from Doña Teresa's Taquería? They even dare to play Mexican music of their dining room! That's cultural appropriation!"). See also, Othering. Infotainment (also Infortainment; Fake News; InfoWars); A very corrupt and dangerous fashionable media-pushed fallacy that intentionally and knowingly stirs in information, news, falsities and outright lies with entertainment, a mixture often concocted for particular, base ideological and revenue-making motives. Origins of this fallacy predate the present era within the type of "Yellow" or "Tabloid" Journalism. This deadly fallacy has brought on countless social unrest, discontent and even capturing wars (e.g., the Spanish American War) over the course of modern historical past. Practitioners of this fallacy sometimes hypocritically justify its use on the basis that their readers/listeners/viewers "know beforehand" (or ought to know) that the content material provided isn't meant as actual news and is offered for entertainment purposes only, but the truth is this caveat isn't noticed by uncritical audiences who eagerly swallow what the purveyors put forth. See additionally Dog-Whistle Politics. The Job's Comforter Fallacy (also, "Karma is a bi**h;" "What goes round comes around."): The fallacy that since there is no such thing as a such factor as random chance and we (I, my group, or my country) are underneath particular protection of heaven, any misfortune or natural catastrophe that we suffer have to be a punishment for our personal or someone else's secret sin or open wickedness. The opposite of the Appeal to Heaven, this is the fallacy employed by the Westboro Baptist Church members who protest fallen service members' funerals all across the United States. See also, Magical Thinking. Just Do it. (additionally, "Find a approach;" "I don't care the way you do it;" "Accomplish the mission;" "By Any Means Necessary." ): A pure, abusive Argumentum ad Baculum (argument from power), through which somebody in energy arbitrarily waves apart or overrules the moral objections of subordinates or followers and orders them to accomplish a goal by any means required, truthful or foul The clear implication is that unethical or immoral strategies must be used. E.g., "You say there is not any approach you may finish the dig on schedule since you discovered an outdated pioneer gravesite with a fancy tombstone on the excavation site? Well, find a means! Make it disappear! Just do it! I do not need to know the way you do it, simply do it! This is one million greenback contract and we'd like it done by Tuesday." See additionally, Plausible Deniability. Just Plain Folks (also, "Values"): This corrupt modern argument from ethos argues to a much less-educated or rural audience that the one arguing is "just plain of us" who is a "plain talker," "says what s/he is considering," "scorns political correctness," somebody who "you do not need a dictionary to grasp" and who thinks just like the audience and is thus worthy of belief, in contrast to some member of the fancy-speaking, latte-sipping Left Coast Political Elite, some "double-domed professor," "inside-the-beltway Washington bureaucrat," "tree-hugger" or other despised outsider who "would not think like we do" or "does not share our values." It is a counterpart to the Ad Hominem Fallacy and most often carries a distinct reek of xenophobia or racism as properly. See additionally the Plain Truth Fallacy and the Simpleton's Fallacy. The Law of Unintended Consequences (also, "Every Revolution Finally ends up Eating its own Young:" Grit; Resilience Doctrine): In this very harmful, archly pessimistic postmodern fallacy the bogus "Law of Unintended Consequences," as soon as a semi-humorous satirical corollary of "Murphy's Law," is elevated to to the standing of an iron legislation of history. This fallacy arbitrarily proclaims a priori that since we are able to never know every little thing or securely foresee anything, sooner or later in as we speak's "complex world" unforeseeable opposed consequences and damaging unintended effects (so-referred to as "unknown unknowns") will at all times find yourself blindsiding and overwhelming, defeating and vitiating any and all naive "do-gooder" efforts to improve our world. Instead, one must always anticipate defeat and be ready to roll with the punches by creating "grit" or "resilience" as a main survival ability. This nihilist fallacy is a sensible negation of the the potential of any legitimate argument from logos. See additionally, TINA. Lying with Statistics: The contemporary fallacy of misusing true figures and numbers to "prove" unrelated claims. (e.g. "In real terms, attending school has never been cheaper than it is now. When expressed as a percentage of the nationwide debt, the cost of getting a faculty schooling is definitely far less at present than it was back in 1965!"). A corrupted argument from logos, often preying on the general public's perceived or precise mathematical ignorance. This includes the Tiny Percentage Fallacy, that an amount or motion that is quite vital in and of itself somehow becomes insignificant just because it is a tiny percentage of something much bigger. E.g., the arbitrary arrest, detention or interception of "solely" a few hundred legally-boarded international travelers as a tiny percentage of the tens of thousands who usually arrive. Under this similar fallacy a shopper who would choke on spending an extra dollar for 2 cans of peas will usually ignore $50 additional on the price of a car or $a thousand further on the value of a house simply because these variations are "only" a tiny share of the a lot larger amount being spent. Historically, sales taxes or worth-added taxes (VAT) have successfully gained public acceptance and remain "below the radar" due to this latter fallacy, despite the fact that amounting to a whole lot or hundreds of dollars a 12 months in additional tax burden. See additionally Half-truth, the Snow Job, and the Red Herring. Magical Thinking (also, the Sin of Presumption; Expect a Miracle!): An ancient however deluded fallacy of logos, arguing that in relation to "crunch time," offered one has sufficient faith, prays exhausting enough, says the best words, does the correct rituals, "names it and claims it," or "claims the Promise," God will at all times suspend the laws of the universe and work a miracle on the request of or for the benefit of the True Believer. In observe this nihilist fallacy denies the existence of a rational or predictable universe and thus the potential for any legitimate argument from logic. See also, Positive Thinking, the Appeal to Heaven, and the Job's Comforter fallacy. Mala Fides (Arguing in Bad Faith; also Sophism): Using an argument that the arguer himself or herself knows shouldn't be valid. E.g., An unbeliever attacking believers by throwing verses from their own Holy Scriptures at them, or a lawyer arguing for the innocence of somebody whom s/he knows full nicely to be responsible. This latter is a standard observe in American jurisprudence, and is typically portrayed as the worst face of "Sophism." [Special because of Bradley Steffens for pointing out this fallacy!] Included underneath this fallacy is the fallacy of Motivational Truth (additionally, Demagogy, or Campaign Promises), intentionally lying to "the people" to gain their support or inspire them toward some action the rhetor perceives to be desirable (utilizing evil discursive means toward a "good" material end). A particularly bizarre and corrupt type of this latter fallacy is Self Deception (also, Whistling by the Graveyard). during which one intentionally and knowingly deludes oneself so as to realize a objective, or maybe merely to suppress anxiety and maintain one's energy level, enthusiasm, morale, peace of mind or sanity in moments of adversity. Measurability: A corrupt argument from logos and ethos (that of science and arithmetic), the fashionable Fallacy of Measurability proposes that if one thing can't be measured, quantified and replicated it does not exist, or is "nothing but anecdotal, touchy-feely stuff" unworthy of critical consideration, i.e., mere gossip or subjective opinion. Often, reaching "Measurability" essentially calls for preselecting, "fiddling" or "massaging" the accessible knowledge merely with the intention to make it statistically tractable, or as a way to help a desired conclusion. Scholar Thomas Persing thus describes "The modernist fallacy of falsely and inappropriately making use of norms, standardizations, and knowledge level requirements to quantify productiveness or success. This is much like advanced question, measurability, and oversimplification fallacies where the person makes an attempt to categorize complicated / numerous subjects into terms that when measured, go well with their position. For instance, the calculation of inflation within the United States would not embrace the modifications in the worth to gasoline, because the worth of gasoline is simply too volatile, despite the actual fact gasoline is important for most people to stay their lives in the United States." See also, "A Priori Argument," "Lying with Statistics," and the "Procrustean Fallacy." Mind-reading (Also, "The Fallacy of Speculation;" "I can read you want a e book"): An historical fallacy, a corruption of stasis idea, speculating about someone else's ideas, emotions, motivations and "body language" and then claiming to grasp these clearly, generally extra accurately than the individual in question is aware of themselves. The rhetor deploys this phony "information" as a fallacious warrant for or against a given standpoint. Scholar Myron Peto gives as an example the baseless declare that "Obama doesn’t a da** [sic] for human rights." Assertions that "name for speculation" are rightly rejected as fallacious in U.S. judicial proceedings but far too typically pass uncontested in public discourse. The opposite of this fallacy is the postmodern fallacy of Mind Blindness (additionally, the Autist's Fallacy), a whole denial of any regular human capacity for "Theory of Mind," postulating the utter incommensurability and privateness of minds and thus the impossibility of ever realizing or actually understanding one other's ideas, emotions, motivations or intents. This fallacy, much promoted by the late postmodernist guru Jacques Derrida, necessarily vitiates any type of Stasis Theory. However, the Fallacy of Mind Blindness has been decisively refuted in several research, together with current (2017) research revealed by the Association for Psychological Science, and a (2017) Derxel University study indicating how "our minds align when we communicate." Moral Licensing: The contemporary moral fallacy that one's constantly moral life, good behavior or latest extreme suffering or sacrifice earns him/her the suitable to commit an immoral act with out repercussions, consequences or punishment. E.g., "I have been good all year, so one unhealthy won't matter," or "After what I've been by way of, God is aware of I need this." The fallacy of Moral Licensing can be typically utilized to nations, e.g., "Those that criticize repression and the Gulag in the former USSR neglect what extraordinary suffering the Russians went by means of in World War II and the thousands and thousands upon millions who died." See additionally Argument from Motives. The opposite of this fallacy is the (excessively rare in our times) moral fallacy of Scruples, during which one obsesses to pathological excess about one's unintentional, forgotten, unconfessed or unforgiven sins and because of them, the seemingly inevitable prospect of eternal damnation. Moral Superiority (additionally, Self Righteousness; the Moral High Ground): An historic, immoral and very dangerous fallacy, enunciated in Thomistic / Scholastic philosophy in the late Middle Ages, arguing that Evil has no rights that the good and the Righteous are bound to respect. That approach lies torture, heretic-burning, and the Spanish Inquisition. Those who observe this vicious fallacy reject any "ethical equivalency" (i.e., even-handed treatment) between themselves (the Righteous) and their enemies (the Wicked), against whom anything is fair, and to whom nothing must be conceded, not even the fitting to life. This fallacy is a selected denial of the historical "Golden Rule," and has been the cause of countless intractable battle, since if one is Righteous no negotiation with Evil and its minions is feasible; The one imaginable road to a "just" peace is through whole victory, i.e., absolutely the defeat and liquidation of one's Wicked enemies. American folks singer and Nobel Laureate Bob Dylan expertly demolishes this fallacy in his 1963 protest song, "With God on Our Side." See additionally the Appeal to Heaven, and Moving the Goalposts. Mortification (also, Live as though You're Dying; Pleasure-hating; No Pain No Gain): An ancient fallacy of logos, trying to "beat the flesh into submission" by excessive exercise or ascetic practices, deliberate starvation or infliction of ache, denying the undeniable proven fact that discomfort and ache exist for the aim of warning of lasting injury to the physique. Extreme examples of this fallacy are varied types of self-flagellation resembling practiced by the brand new Mexico "Penitentes" throughout Holy Week or by Shia devotees during Muharram. More familiar contemporary manifestations of this fallacy are excessive "insanity" exercise regimes not meant for normal well being, health or competitive purposes but just to "toughen" or "punish" the physique. Certain pop-nutritional theories and diets appear based mostly on this fallacy as well. Some contemporary specialists recommend that self-mortification (an English word related to the Latinate French root "mort," or "loss of life.") is in actual fact "suicide on the installment plan." Others suggest that it entails a narcotic-like addiction to the physique's pure endorphins. The other of this fallacy is the ancient fallacy of Hedonism, in search of and valuing bodily pleasure as a good in itself, simply for its personal sake. Moving the Goalposts (additionally, Changing the principles; All's Fair in Love and War; The Nuclear Option; "Winning is not every little thing, it is the only factor"): A fallacy of logos, demanding sure proof or evidence, a certain degree of help or a certain number of votes to resolve an issue, and then when this is obtainable, demanding much more, different or better assist as a way to deny victory to an opponent. For individuals who practice the fallacy of Moral Superiority (above), Moving the Goalposts is commonly perceived as completely good and permissible if mandatory to prevent the victory of Wickedness and ensure the triumph of one's personal side, i.e, the Righteous. MYOB (Mind Your individual Business; also You are not the Boss of Me; "None of yer beeswax," "So What?", The Appeal to Privacy): The contemporary fallacy of arbitrarily prohibiting or terminating any dialogue of 1's own standpoints or behavior, regardless of how absurd, harmful, evil or offensive, by drawing a phony curtain of privateness round oneself and one's actions. A corrupt argument from ethos (one's own). E.g., "Sure, I used to be doing eighty and weaving between lanes on Mesa Street--what's it to you? You're not a cop, you are not my nanny. It's my business if I need to hurry, and your enterprise to get the hell out of my approach. Mind your personal damn business!" Or, "Yeah, I killed my baby. So what? Butt out! It wasn't your brat, so it's none of your damn enterprise!" Rational dialogue is lower off because "it is none of your corporation!" See additionally, "Taboo." The counterpart of this is "Nobody Will Ever Know," (additionally "What happens in Vegas stays in Vegas;" "I think We're Alone Now," or the center of Darkness Syndrome) the fallacy that simply because no person necessary is wanting (or because one is on vacation, or away in school, or overseas) one could freely commit immoral, selfish, unfavourable or evil acts at will without expecting any of the normal consequences or punishment . Author Joseph Conrad graphically describes this kind of ethical degradation in the character of Kurtz in his basic novel, Heart of Darkness. Name-Calling: Quite a lot of the "Ad Hominem" argument. The dangerous fallacy that, merely because of who one is or is alleged to be, any and all arguments, disagreements or objections towards one's standpoint or actions are robotically racist, sexist, anti-Semitic, bigoted, discriminatory or hateful. E.g., "My stand on abortion is the one correct one. To disagree with me, argue with me or query my judgment in any approach would only present what a pig you actually are." Also applies to refuting an argument by simply calling it a "fallacy," or declaring it invalid with out proving why it's invalid, or summarily dismissing arguments or opponents by labeling them "racist," "communist," "fascist," "moron," any identify adopted by the suffix "tard" (quick for the highly offensive "retard") or some other unfavourable identify without additional rationalization. E.g., "He's an a**gap, finish of story" or "I'm a loser." A subset of that is the Newspeak fallacy, creating identification with a certain form of audience by inventing or using racist or offensive, typically army-sounding nicknames for opponents or enemies, e.g., "The damned DINO's are even worse than the Repugs and the Neocons." Or, "In the large One it took us solely five years to beat each the J*ps and the Jerries, so more than a decade and a half after niner-eleven why is it so hard for us to beat a raggedy bunch of Hajjis and Towel-heads?" Note that originally the word "Nazi" belonged on this category, but this term has lengthy come into use as a correct English noun. See additionally, "Reductionism," "Ad Hominem Argument," and "Alphabet Soup." The Narrative Fallacy (also, the Fable; the Poster Child) The historic fallacy of persuasion by telling a "heartwarming" or horrifying story or fable, notably to less-educated or uncritical audiences who're less seemingly to grasp purely logical arguments or general rules. E.g., Charles Dickens' "A Christmas Carol." Narratives and fables, particularly people who identify names and personalize arguments, tend to be much more persuasive at a preferred level than other types of argument and are virtually irrefutable, even when the story in question is well known to be completely fictional. This fallacy is discovered even in the sphere of science, as famous by a current (2017) scientific study. The NIMBY Fallacy (Not in My Back Yard; additionally "Build a Wall!"; "Lock'em up and throw away the key;" The Ostrich Strategy; The Gitmo Solution.). The infantile fallacy that a problem, challenge or menace that is not bodily close by or to which I'm circuitously uncovered has for all practical purposes "gone away" and ceased to exist. Thus, a problem may be completely and definitively solved by "making it go away," preferably to someplace "out of sight," a walled-off ghetto or a distant isle where there is no news coverage, and the place no one essential stays. Lacking that, it can be made to go away by simply eliminating, censoring or ignoring "detrimental" media coverage and public discussion of the issue and focusing on "optimistic, encouraging" things as an alternative. No Discussion (additionally No Negotiation; the Control Voice; Peace by way of Strength; a Muscular Foreign Policy; Fascism): A pure Argumentum advert Baculum that rejects reasoned dialogue, offering both immediate, unconditional compliance/surrender or defeat/loss of life as the one two options for settling even minor variations, e.g., screaming "Get down on the ground, now!" or declaring "We don't talk to terrorists." This deadly fallacy falsely paints real or potential "hostiles" as monsters devoid of all motive, and far too often incorporates a very robust factor of "machismo" as well. I.e. "An actual, muscular chief by no means resorts to pantywaist pleading, apologies, excuses, fancy discuss or argument. That's for legal professionals, liars and pansies and is nothing however a delaying tactic. An actual man stands tall, says what he thinks, draws fast and shoots to kill." The late actor John Wayne frequently portrayed this fallacy in his movie roles. See additionally, The Pout. Non-recognition: A deluded fallacy in which one intentionally chooses to not publicly "acknowledge" floor fact, normally on the theory that this could by some means reward evil-doers if we recognize their deeds as real or consequential. Often the underlying concept is that the state of affairs is "short-term" and can quickly be reversed. E.g., Within the decades from 1949 until Richard Nixon's presidency the United States formally refused to recognize the existence of essentially the most populous nation on earth, the People's Republic of China, because America supported the U.S.-pleasant Republic of China government on Taiwan as an alternative and hoped they may someway return to power on the mainland. Perversely, in 2016 the U.S. President-Elect brought on a significant worldwide flap by chatting with the President of the federal government on Taiwan, a de facto violation of lengthy-standing American non-recognition of that very same regime. More than half a century after the Korean War the U.S. nonetheless refuses to pronounce the name of, or recognize (a lot much less conduct regular, peaceful negotiations with) a nuclear-armed DPRK (North Korea). A person who practices this fallacy risks institutionalization (e.g., "I refuse to acknowledge Mom's murder, 'cuz that'd give the victory to the murderer! I refuse to look at you bury her! Stop! Stop!") but tragically, such behavior is only too common in international relations. See additionally the State Actor Fallacy, Political Correctness, and The Pout. The Non Sequitur: The deluded fallacy of offering evidence, causes or conclusions that have no logical connection to the argument at hand (e.g. "The reason I flunked your course is because the U. S. authorities is now putting out purple 5-greenback payments! Purple!"). (See additionally Red Herring.) Nothing New Under the Sun (also, Uniformitarianism, "Seen all of it earlier than;" "Surprise, surprise;" "Plus ça change, plus c'est la même selected."): Fairly rare in contemporary discourse, this deeply cynical fallacy, a corruption of the argument from logos, falsely proposes that there just isn't and will never be any real novelty in this world. Any argument that there are really "new" ideas or phenomena is judged a priori to be unworthy of severe discussion and dismissed with a jaded sigh and a wave of the hand as "the usual same old." E.g., "[Sigh!] Idiots! Don't you see that the current influx of refugees from the Mideast is just the standard Muslim invasion of Christendom that’s been happening for 1,four hundred years?" Or, "Libertarianism is nothing but re-warmed anarchism, which, in flip, is nothing however the historic Antinomian Heresy. Like I informed you earlier than, there's nothing new underneath the sun!"</p><p>Olfactory Rhetoric (additionally, "The Nose Knows"): A vicious, zoological-stage fallacy of pathos through which opponents are marginalized, dehumanized or hated primarily based on their supposed odor, lack of private cleanliness, imagined diseases or filth. E. g., "Those demonstrators are demanding something or another but I'll solely discuss to them if first they go home and take a bath!" Or, "I can odor a Jew a block away!" Also applies to demeaning different cultures or nationalities based mostly on their differing cuisines, e.g., "I don't care what they say or do, their breath always stinks of garlic. And have you ever ever smelled their kitchens?" Olfactory Rhetoric straddles the borderline between a fallacy and a psychopathology. A 2017 study by Ruhr University Bochum suggests that olfactory rhetoric does not arise from a simple, computerized physiological response to an actual odor, but in reality, strongly depends on one's predetermined reaction or prejudices toward another, and one's olfactory center "is activated even before we perceive an odour." See additionally, Othering.</p><p>Oops! (also, "Oh, I forgot...," "The Judicial Surprise," "The October Surprise,"): A corrupt argument from logos by which towards the decisive finish of a dialogue, debate, trial, electoral campaign period, or resolution-making course of an opponent immediately, elaborately and usually sarcastically shams having simply remembered or uncovered some salient truth, argument or evidence. E.g., "Oops, I forgot to ask you: You had been convicted of this similar offense twice earlier than, weren't you?!" Banned in American judicial argument, this fallacy is just too widespread in public discourse. Also applies to supposedly "discovering" and sensationally reporting some doubtlessly damning data or proof after which, after the injury has been accomplished or the decision has been made, quietly declaring, "Oops, I suppose that actually wasn't that significant after all. Ignore what I said. Sorry 'bout that!"</p><p>Othering (also Otherizing, "They're not Like Us," Stereotyping, Xenophobia, Racism, Prejudice): A badly corrupted, discriminatory argument from ethos where facts, arguments, experiences or objections are arbitrarily disregarded, ignored or put down without severe consideration because these concerned "will not be like us," or "don't assume like us." E.g., "It's Ok for Mexicans to earn a buck an hour within the maquiladoras [Mexico-primarily based "Twin Plants" run by American or different overseas companies]. If it occurred here I'd call it brutal exploitation and daylight robbery but south of the border, down Mexico approach the economy is different and they don't seem to be like us." Or, "You declare that life must be actually horrible over there for terrorists to ever consider blowing themselves up with suicide vests just to make a degree, but always remember that they're totally different from us. They do not think about life and dying the identical method we do." A vicious number of the Ad Hominem Fallacy, most often applied to non-white or non-Christian populations. A variation on this fallacy is the "Speakee" Fallacy ("You speakee da English?"; also the Shibboleth), through which an opponent's arguments are mocked, ridiculed and dismissed solely due to the speaker's alleged or real accent, dialect, or lack of fluency in customary English, e.g., "He advised me 'Vee vorkers need to type a younion!' however I told him I'm not a 'vorker,' and to come back back when he learns to talk proper English." A really harmful, excessive instance of Othering is Dehumanization, a fallacy of faulty analogy the place opponents are dismissed as mere cockroaches, lice, apes, monkeys, rats, weasels or bloodsucking parasites who don't have any proper to talk or to stay at all, and doubtless must be "squashed like bugs." This fallacy is in the end the "logic" behind ethnic cleansing, genocide and fuel ovens. See also the Identity Fallacy, "Name Calling" and "Olfactory Rhetoric." The alternative of this fallacy is the "Pollyanna Principle" beneath.</p><p>Overexplanation: A fallacy of logos stemming from the actual paradox that past a sure level, more clarification, instructions, knowledge, dialogue, proof or proof inevitably results in much less, not more, understanding. Contemporary urban mythology holds that this fallacy is usually male ("Mansplaining"), whereas barely half a century ago the prevailing myth was that it was men who have been naturally monosyllabic, grunting or non-verbal whereas ladies would sometimes overexplain (e.g., the 1960 hit song by Joe Jones, "You Talk Too much"). "Mansplaining" is, in accordance with scholar Danelle Pecht, "the infuriating tendency of many males to all the time need to be the smartest person within the room, regardless of the subject of dialogue and the way a lot they actually know!" See additionally The Snow Job, and the "Plain Truth" fallacy.</p><p>Overgeneralization (additionally Hasty Generalization; Totus pro Partes Fallacy; the Merological Fallacy): A fallacy of logos the place a broad generalization that's agreed to be true is offered as overriding all particular circumstances, particularly special instances requiring quick attention. E.g., "Doctor, you say that this time of 12 months a flu vaccination is essential. but I might counter that all vaccinations are important" (implying that I'm not going to present particular consideration to getting the flu shot). Or, trying to refute "Black Lives Matter" by replying, "All Lives Matter," the latter undeniably true but nonetheless a fallacious overgeneralization in that particular and urgent context. " Overgeneralization may also mean one sees a single unfavourable final result as an eternal sample of defeat. Overgeneralization might also embrace the the Pars professional Toto Fallacy, the stupid however frequent fallacy of incorrectly making use of one or two true examples to all cases. E.g., a minority one who commits a very horrifying crime, and whose example is then used to smear the repute of the whole group, or when a authorities publishes particular lists of crimes committed by teams who're imagined to be hated, e.g., Jews, or undocumented immigrants. Famously, the case of 1 Willie Horton was efficiently used on this manner within the 1988 American presidential election to smear African Americans, Liberals, and by extension, Democratic presidential candidate Michael Dukakis. See additionally the fallacy of "Zero Tolerance" under. The Paralysis of Analysis (additionally, Procrastination; the Nirvana Fallacy): A postmodern fallacy that since all knowledge isn't in, any conclusion is at all times provisional, no reputable decision can ever be made and any action should all the time be delayed until forced by circumstances. A corruption of the argument from logos. (See also the "Law of Unintended Consequences.") The Passive Voice Fallacy (also, the Bureaucratic Passive): A fallacy from ethos, concealing energetic human agency behind the curtain of the grammatical passive voice, e.g., "It has been decided that you are to be let go," arrogating an ethos of cosmic infallibility and inevitability to a really fallible aware resolution made by identifiable, fallible and doubtlessly culpable human beings. Scholar Jackson Katz notes (2017): "We speak about how many ladies have been raped last yr, not about how many males raped girls. We speak about what number of girls in a school district have been harassed last year, not about how many boys harassed women. We discuss how many teenage ladies in the state of Vermont bought pregnant final year, fairly than how many men and boys impregnated teenage women. ... So you'll be able to see how using the passive voice has a political impact. [It] shifts the main target off of males and boys and onto ladies and ladies. Even the time period 'Violence towards girls' is problematic. It is a passive construction; there's no lively agent in the sentence. It's a foul factor that occurs to girls, however if you look on the time period 'violence against girls' nobody is doing it to them, it simply occurs to them... Men aren't even part of it." See additionally, Political Correctness. An obverse of the Passive Voice Fallacy is the Be-verb Fallacy, a cultish linguistic theory and the bane of many a primary-yr composition pupil's life, alleging that an extraordinary degree of "readability," "sanity," or textual "liveliness" could be reached by strictly eliminating all passive verb types and all types of the verb "to be" from English-language writing. This odd but unproven contention, courting back to Alfred Korzybski's "General Semantics" self-enchancment movement of the 1920's and '30's through S. I. Hayakawa, blithely ignores the fact that though quite a few major world languages lack a ubiquitous "be-verb," e.g., Russian, Hindi and Arabic, audio system of those languages, like English-talking General Semantics devotees themselves, have never been confirmed to enjoy any explicit cognitive benefit over abnormal everyday users of the passive voice and the verb "to be." Nor have writers of the curiously stilted English that results from making use of this fallacy achieved any special success in academia, skilled or technical writing, or in the popular domain. Paternalism: A serious fallacy of ethos, arbitrarily tut-tutting, dismissing or ignoring another's arguments or considerations as "childish" or "immature;" taking a condescending attitude of superiority towards opposing standpoints or towards opponents themselves. E.g., "Your argument against the warfare is so infantile. Try approaching the problem like an grownup for a change," "I do not argue with youngsters," or "Somebody has to be the grownup in the room, and it might as effectively be me. Here's why you're wrong..." Also refers back to the sexist fallacy of dismissing a girl's argument because she is a lady, e.g., "Oh, it have to be that point of the month, eh?" See additionally "Ad Hominem Argument" and "Tone Policing." Personalizaion: A deluded fallacy of ethos, seeing yourself or someone else because the essential trigger of some external occasion for which you or the opposite particular person had no responsibility. E.g., "Never fails! It needed to happen! It's my ordinary rotten luck that the biggest blizzard of the 12 months had to happen just on the day of our winter festival. If it wasn't for ME being concerned I'm certain the blizzard wouldn't have happened!" This fallacy will also be taken in a constructive sense, e.g. Hitler evidently believed that just because he was Hitler each bullet would miss him and no explosive might contact him. "Personalization" straddles the borderline between a fallacy and a psychopathology. See additionally, "The Job's Comforter Fallacy," and "Magical Thinking." The Plain Truth Fallacy; (also, the straightforward Truth fallacy, Salience Bias, the KISS Principle [Keep it Short and Simple / Keep it Simple, Stupid], the Monocausal Fallacy; the Executive Summary): A fallacy of logos favoring acquainted, singular, summarized or easily comprehensible data, examples, explanations and evidence over those that are extra complicated and unfamiliar but much closer to the reality. E.g., "Ooooh, look in any respect those equations and formulation! Just boil it all the way down to the easy Truth," or "I don't want your damned philosophy lesson! Just tell me the Plain Truth about why this is occurring." A more sophisticated model of this fallacy arbitrarily proposes, as did 18th century Scottish rhetorician John Campbell, that the truth is at all times simple by nature and solely malicious enemies of Truth would ever seek to make it complicated. (See additionally, The Snow Job, and Overexplanation.) The alternative of this is the postmodern fallacy of Ineffability or Complexity (additionally, Truthiness; Post-Truth),, arbitrarily declaring that right now's world is so advanced that there is no reality, or that Truth (capital-T), if certainly such a thing exists, is unknowable except maybe by God or the Messiah and is thus perpetually inaccessible and irrelevant to us mere mortals, making any cogent argument from logos inconceivable. See also the big Lie, and Paralysis of Analysis. Plausible Deniability: A vicious fallacy of ethos below which somebody in power forces those beneath his or her management to do some questionable or evil act and to then falsely assume or conceal accountability for that act so as to protect the ethos of the one in command. E.g., "Arrange a fatal accident however be certain that I do know nothing about it!" Playing on Emotion (also, the Sob Story; the Pathetic Fallacy; the "Bleeding Heart" fallacy, the Drama Queen / Drama King Fallacy): The traditional fallacy of pure argument from pathos, ignoring details and evoking emotion alone. E.g., "If you don’t agree that witchcraft is a major downside just shut up, shut your eyes for a moment and picture in your mind all these poor mothers crying bitter tears for their innocent tiny children whose cozy little beds and pleased tricycles lie all cold and abandoned, just because of these wicked outdated witches! Let's string’em all up!" The opposite of that is the Apathetic Fallacy (also, Cynicism; Burnout; Compassion Fatigue), where any and all reputable arguments from pathos are brushed apart as a result of, as noted nation music artist Jo Dee Messina sang (2005), "My give-a-damn's busted." Obverse to Playing on Emotion is the historical fallacy of Refinement ("Real Feelings"), the place sure classes of dwelling beings such as plants and non-domesticated animals, infants, babies and minor kids, barbarians, slaves, deep-sea sailors, farmworkers, criminals and convicts, refugees, addicts, terrorists, Catholics, Jews, foreigners, the poor, individuals of color, "Hillbillies," "Hobos," homeless or undocumented people, or "the decrease courses" in general are deemed incapable of experiencing actual ache like we do, or of having any "real emotions" in any respect, only brutish appetites, vile lusts, evil drives, filthy cravings, biological instincts, psychological reflexes and automatic tropisms. Noted rhetorician Kenneth Burke falls into this final, behaviorist fallacy in his in any other case good (1966) Language as Symbolic Action, in his discussion of a bird trapped in a lecture room. See additionally, Othering.</p><p>Political Correctness ("Pc"): A postmodern fallacy, a counterpart of the "Name Calling" fallacy, supposing that the character of a factor or situation might be changed by simply changing its title. E.g., "Today we strike a blow for animal rights and in opposition to cruelty to animals by changing the identify of ‘pets’ to ‘animal companions.’" Or "Never, ever play the 'victim' card, as a result of it's so manipulative and sounds so damaging, helpless and despairing. Instead of being 'victims,' we are proud to be 'survivors.'" (After all, when "victims" disappear then perpetrators conveniently vanish as well!) See additionally, The Passive Voice Fallacy, and The Scripted Message. Also applies to different types of political "Language Control," e.g., being careful by no means to consult with North Korea or ISIS/ISIL by their fairly pompous proper names ("the Democratic People's Republic of Korea" and "the Islamic State," respectively) or to the Syrian authorities because the "Syrian government," (It's always the "Regime" or the "Dictatorship."). Occasionally the fallacy of "Political Correctness" is falsely confused with easy courtesy, e.g., "I'm sick and tired of the tyranny of Political Correctness, having to observe my words on a regular basis--I need to be free to talk my mind and to name out a N----- or a Queer in public any time I rattling nicely feel like it!" See also, Non-recognition. An opposite of this fallacy is the fallacy of Venting, beneath. The Pollyanna Principle (also, "The Projection Bias," "They're Just like Us," "Singing 'Kumbaya.'"): A conventional, usually tragic fallacy of ethos, that of routinely (and falsely) assuming that everyone else in any given place, time and circumstance had or has principally the identical (optimistic) wishes, needs, pursuits, concerns, ethics and moral code as "we" do. This fallacy virtually if not theoretically denies each the truth of difference and the human capability to chose radical evil. E.g., arguing that "The only factor most Nazi Storm Troopers needed was the same factor we do, to reside in peace and prosperity and to have a superb family life," when the truth was radically otherwise. Dr. William Lorimer presents this clarification: "The Projection Bias is the flip side of the 'They're not Like Us' [Othering] fallacy. The Projection bias (fallacy) is 'They're simply folks like me, due to this fact they have to be motivated by the identical things that encourage me.' For example: 'I'd never pull a gun and shoot a police officer until I used to be convinced he was making an attempt to homicide me; therefore, when Joe Smith shot a police officer, he should have been in genuine fear for his life.' I see the identical fallacy with regard to Israel: 'The people of Gaza simply need to be left in peace; therefore, if Israel would just carry the blockade and allow Hamas to import something they want, with out restriction, they might stop firing rockets at Israel.' That will or will not be true - I personally don't believe it - but the argument clearly presumes that the folks of Gaza, or at least their leaders, are motivated by a need for peaceful co-existence." The Pollyanna Principle was gently but expertly demolished within the traditional twentieth-century American animated cartoon collection, "The Flintstones," during which the humor lay in the absurdity of picturing "Stone Age" characters having the same issues, values and lifestyles as mid-twentieth century white working class Americans. That is the opposite of the Othering fallacy. (Note: The Pollyanna Principle fallacy should not be confused with a psychological precept of the identical name which observes that positive memories are normally retained extra strongly than detrimental ones. ) The Positive Thinking Fallacy: An immensely standard but deluded trendy fallacy of logos, that because we're "pondering positively" that in itself one way or the other biases exterior, objective reality in our favor even earlier than we lift a finger to act. See also, Magical Thinking. Note that this specific fallacy is commonly a part of a much wider closed-minded, considerably cultish ideology the place the practitioner is warned towards taking note of to and even acknowledging the fact of evil, or of "destructive" evidence or counter-arguments towards his/her standpoints. In the latter case rational discussion, argument or refutation is most frequently futile. See also, Deliberate Ignorance. The Post Hoc Argument: (also, "Post Hoc Propter Hoc;" "Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc;" "Too much of a coincidence," the "Clustering Illusion"): The basic paranoiac fallacy of attributing an imaginary causality to random coincidences, concluding that just because one thing occurs near, at the identical time as, or just after one thing else, the very first thing is attributable to the second. E.g., "AIDS first emerged as a epidemic back in the exact same era when Disco music was changing into in style--that's an excessive amount of of a coincidence: It proves that Disco brought about AIDS!" Correlation does not equal causation. The Pout (also The Silent Treatment; Nonviolent Civil Disobedience; Noncooperation): An often-infantile Argumentum ad Baculum that arbitrarily rejects or gives up on dialogue before it's concluded. Probably the most benign nonviolent type of this fallacy is present in passive-aggressive ways similar to slowdowns, boycotts, lockouts, sitdowns and strikes. Under President Barack Obama the United States lastly ended a half-century lengthy political Pout with Cuba. See additionally "No Discussion" and "Nonrecognition." The Procrustean Fallacy (also, "Maintaining Standards," Standardization, Uniformity, Fordism). The modernist fallacy of falsely and inappropriately applying the norms and requirements of standardized manufacturing. quality management and inflexible scheduling, or of navy self-discipline to inherently numerous free human beings, their lives, training, habits, clothing and look. This fallacy typically seems to stem from the pathological need of someone in energy to place in "order" their disturbingly free, messy and disordered universe by proscribing others' freedom and insisting on inflexible standardization, alphabetization, self-discipline, uniformity and "objective" assessment of everybody below their energy. This fallacy partially explains why marching in straight lines, mass calisthenics, goose-stepping, drum-and-bugle or flag corps, standing at consideration, saluting, uniforms, and standardized categorization are so typical of fascism, tyrannical regimes, and of tyrants petty and grand all over the place. Because of creator Eimar O'Duffy for figuring out this fallacy! Prosopology (also, Prosopography, Reciting the Litany; "Tell Me, What Were Their Names?"; Reading the Roll of Martyrs): An historical fallacy of pathos and ethos, publicly studying out loud, singing, or inscribing at length a list of names (most or all of which will likely be unknown to the reader or audience), generally in a unfavourable sense, to underline the gravity of a previous tragedy or mass-casualty event, sometimes in a constructive sense, to emphasize the historical historic continuity of a church, group or trigger. Proper names, especially if they are from the same tradition or language group as the viewers, can have near-mystical persuasive energy. In some circumstances, those who use this fallacy in its contemporary kind will defend it as an try to "personalize" an otherwise anonymous latest mass tragedy. This fallacy was just about unknown in secular American affairs before about 100 years ago, when the customized emerged of listing of the names of local World War I casualties on group monuments across the nation. That that is certainly a fallacy is clear by the fact that the names on these century-old monuments are actually significant solely to genealogists and specialized historians, simply because the names on the Vietnam War Memorial in Washington or the names of those who perished on 9/eleven will surely be in another several generations. The Red Herring (also, Distraction): An irrelevant argument, making an attempt to mislead and distract an audience by bringing up an unrelated but emotionally loaded problem. E.g., "In regard to my a number of bankruptcies and current indictment for corruption let’s be straight up about what’s actually necessary: Terrorism! Just take a look at what happened final week in [title the place]. Vote for me and I'll struggle these terrorists anywhere on the planet!" Also applies to elevating unrelated issues as falsely opposing the issue at hand, e.g., "You say 'Black Lives Matter,' but I'd somewhat say 'Climate Change Matters!'" when the 2 contentions are in no way opposed, only competing for attention. See also Availability Bias, and Dog Whistle Politics. Reductio advert Hitlerum (or, advert Hitleram): A extremely problematic contemporary historical-revisionist contention that the argument "That's just what Hitler mentioned (or would have stated, or would have executed)" is a fallacy, an occasion of the Ad Hominem argument and/or Guilt by Association. Whether the Reductio ad Hitlerum could be thought of an precise fallacy or not appears to fundamentally depend on one's private view of Hitler and the gravity of his crimes.</p><p>Reductionism: (additionally, Oversimplifying, Sloganeering): The fallacy of deceiving an audience by giving easy solutions or bumper-sticker slogans in response to complicated questions, particularly when interesting to much less educated or unsophisticated audiences. E.g., "If the glove doesn’t fit, you need to vote to acquit." Or, "Vote for Snith. He'll carry back jobs!" In science, know-how, engineering and mathematics ("STEM subjects") reductionism is deliberately practiced to make intractable issues computable, e.g., the nicely-recognized humorous suggestion, "First, let's assume the cow is a sphere!". See also, the Plain Truth Fallacy, and Dog-whistle Politics.</p><p>Reifying (also, Mistaking the Map for the Territory): The historical fallacy of treating imaginary mental categories, schemata or names as actual, materials "issues." (E.g., "The War towards Terror is just one other chapter within the eternal struggle to the loss of life between Freedom and Absolute Evil!") Sometimes additionally referred to as "Essentializing" or "Hypostatization." The Romantic Rebel (additionally, the Truthdig / Truthout Fallacy; the Brave Heretic; Conspiracy theories; the Iconoclastic Fallacy): The contemporary fallacy of claiming Truth or validity for one's standpoint solely or primarily as a result of one is supposedly standing up heroically to the dominant "orthodoxy," the current Standard Model, conventional knowledge or Political Correctness, or whatever stands out as the Bandwagon of the moment; a corrupt argument from ethos. E.g., "Back in the day the scientific institution thought that the world was flat, that was until Columbus proved them incorrect! Now they want us to imagine that peculiar water is nothing but H2O. Are you going to consider them? The government is frantically making an attempt to suppress the reality that our public drinking-water supply actually has nitrogen in it and causes congenital vampirism! And what about Area 51? Don't you care? Or are you only a kiss-up for the corrupt scientific institution?" The alternative of the Bandwagon fallacy. The "Save the Children" Fallacy (also, Humanitarian Crisis): A cruel and cynical contemporary media-driven fallacy of pathos, an occasion of the fallacious Appeal to Pity, attracting public assist for intervention in any individual else's crisis in a distant country by repeatedly exhibiting in gross element the extreme (real) suffering of the innocent, defenseless little kids (occasionally extended even to their pets!) on "our" aspect, conveniently ignoring the truth that innocent children on all sides usually suffer the most in any struggle, battle, famine or crisis. Recent (2017) examples embody the so-referred to as "Rohingya" in Myanmar/Burma (ignoring multiple different ethnicities suffering ongoing hunger and conflict in that impoverished country), children in rebel-held areas of Syria (areas held by our rebels, not by the Syrian authorities or by Islamic State rebels), and the children of Mediterranean boat-individuals (mild complected children from the Mideast, Afghanistan and North Africa, however not darker, African-complected youngsters from sub-Saharan international locations, youngsters who are evidently deemed by the media to be far less worthy of pity). Scholar Glen Greenwald points out that a cynical key part of this tactic is hiding the baby and grownup victims of 1's own violence whereas "milking" the tragic, blood-soaked photos of youngsters killed by the "different facet" for each tear they'll generate as a causus belli [a puffed-up excuse for conflict, battle or American/Western intervention]. Scapegoating (additionally, Blamecasting): The historical fallacy that every time something goes fallacious there's always someone aside from oneself to blame. Although sometimes this fallacy is a practical denial of randomness or likelihood itself, at this time it's more usually a mere insurance coverage-pushed business choice ("I don't care if it was an accident! Somebody with deep pockets is gonna pay for this!"), although often scapegoating is no more than a cynical ploy to shield those actually responsible from blame. The term "Scapegoating" is also used to consult with the tactic of casting collective blame on marginalized or scorned "Others," e.g., "The Jews are to blame!" A very corrupt and cynical example of scapegoating is the fallacy of Blaming the Victim, during which one falsely casts the blame for one's personal evil or questionable actions on these affected, e.g., "If you progress an eyelash I'll have to kill you and you will be to blame!" "If you do not bow to our calls for we'll shut down the government and it will be completely YOUR fault!" or "You bi**h, you acted flirty and made me rape you! Then you definitely snitched on me to the cops and allow them to acquire a rape kit on you, and now I'll prison and every little bit of it is your fault!" See additionally, the Affective Fallacy. Scare Tactics (also Appeal to Fear; Paranoia; the Bogeyman Fallacy; Shock Doctrine [ShockDoc]; Rally 'Round the Flag; Rally 'Round the President): Quite a lot of Playing on Emotions, a corrupted argument from pathos, taking advantage of a emergent or intentionally-created disaster and its related public shock, panic and chaos to be able to impose an argument, motion or resolution that would be clearly unacceptable if rigorously considered. E.g., "If you do not shut up and do what I say we're all gonna die! In this moment of disaster we can't afford the luxury of criticizing or making an attempt to second-guess my decisions when our very lives and freedom are in peril! Instead, we must be united as one!" Or, in the (2017) words of former White House Spokesperson Sean Spicer, "That is concerning the security of America!" This fallacy is mentioned at size in Naomi Klein's (2010) The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism and her (2017) No just isn't Enough: Resisting Trump's Shock Politics and Winning the World We need. See additionally, The Shopping Hungry Fallacy, Dog-Whistle Politics, "We Have to do Something!", and The Worst Case Fallacy. "Scoring" (additionally, Moving the Ball Down the sphere, the Sports World Fallacy; "Hey, Sports Fans!"): An instance of defective analogy, the widespread contemporary fallacy of inappropriately and most frequently offensively applying sports activities, gaming, looking or other recreational imagery to unrelated areas of life, equivalent to warfare or intimacy. E.g., "Nope, I haven't scored with Francis but, however last night time I managed to get to third base!" or "We actually must take our ground sport into Kim's half of the field if we ever count on to attain against North Korea." This fallacy is almost all the time soaked in testosterone and machismo. An associated fallacy is that of Evening up the Score (additionally, Getting Even), exacting tit-for-tat vengeance as though life had been some sort of "point-rating" sports activities contest. Counter-arguments to the "Scoring" fallacy normally fall on deaf ears, since the one and solely purpose for playing a game is to "rating," is not it? The Scripted Message (also, Talking Points): A contemporary fallacy related to Big Lie Technique, where a politician or public figure strictly limits her/his statements on a given challenge to repeating carefully scripted, usually exaggerated or empty phrases developed to achieve most acceptance or maximum desired reaction from a target audience. See also, Dog Whistle Politics, and Political Correctness, above. The opposite of this fallacy is that of "Venting." Sending the Wrong Message: A harmful fallacy of logos that assaults a given assertion, argument or motion, no matter how good, true or crucial, because it is going to "ship the unsuitable message." In effect, those who use this fallacy are brazenly confessing to fraud and admitting that the truth will destroy the fragile internet of illusion they've deliberately created by their lies. E.g., "Actually, we have not a clue about how to deal with this crisis, but when we publicly admit it we'll be sending the mistaken message." See also, "Mala Fides."</p><p>Shifting the Burden of Proof: A classic fallacy of logos that challenges an opponent to disprove a declare somewhat than asking the individual making the declare to defend his/her personal argument. E.g., "Lately space-aliens are in every single place among us, masquerading as true humans, even right here on campus! I dare you to prove it is not so! See? You can't! You admit it! That means what I say needs to be true. Likely, you are one of them, since you appear to be so comfortable on area-aliens!" A typical tactic in utilizing this fallacy is first to get an opponent to admit that a far-fetched declare, or some reality associated to it, is certainly no less than theoretically "attainable," after which declare the declare "proven" absent proof to the opposite. E.g., "So you admit that large undetected voter fraud is certainly attainable underneath our current system, and could have happened on this country at least in principle, and you can't produce even the tiniest scintilla of evidence that it didn't truly occur! Ha-ha! I relaxation my case." See additionally, Argument from Ignorance. The Shopping Hungry Fallacy: A fallacy of pathos, a wide range of Playing on Emotions and generally Scare Tactics, making silly but important selections (or being prompted, manipulated or forced to "freely" take public or private choices that may be later regretted but are troublesome to reverse) "in the heat of the second" when beneath the affect of robust emotion (starvation, concern, lust, anger, sadness, regret, fatigue, even joy, love or happiness). E.g., Trevor Noah, (2016) host of the Daily Show on American television attributes public approval of draconian measures within the Patriot Act and the creation of the U. S. Department of Homeland Security to America's "purchasing hungry" instantly after 9/11. See also, Scare Tactics; "We Must Do Something;" and The large "But" Fallacy. The Silent Majority Fallacy: Quite a lot of the argument from ignorance, this fallacy, famously enunciated by disgraced American President Richard Nixon, alleges particular information of a hidden "silent majority" of voters (or of the population on the whole) that stands in support of an in any other case unpopular leader and his/her insurance policies, opposite to the repeated findings of polls, surveys and widespread vote totals. In an excessive case the chief arrogates to him/herself the title of the "Voice of the Voiceless." The Simpleton's Fallacy: (Or, The "Good Simpleton" Fallacy): A corrupt fallacy of logos, described in an undated quote from science writer Isaac Asimov as "The false notion that democracy implies that 'my ignorance is simply as good as your information.'" The title of this fallacy is borrowed from Walter M. Miller Jr.'s basic (1960) put up-apocalyptic novel, A Canticle for Leibowitz, wherein within the centuries after a nuclear holocaust information and learning develop into so despised that "Good Simpleton" becomes the usual type of interpersonal salutation. This fallacy is masterfully portrayed within the particular person of the title character in the 1994 Hollywood movie, "Forrest Gump." The fallacy is extensively alleged to have had an amazing deal to do with the outcome of the 2016 US presidential election, See additionally "Just Plain Folks," and the "Plain Truth Fallacy." U.S. President Barrack Obama famous to the contrary (2016), "In politics and in life, ignorance isn't a advantage. It's not cool to not know what you are speaking about. That's not real or telling it like it is. That's not challenging political correctness. That's simply not knowing what you are speaking about." The time period "Simpleton's Fallacy" has also been used to confer with a misleading strategy of argumentation, feigning ignorance with a purpose to get one's opponent to admit to, explain or overexplain something s/he would somewhat not talk about. E.g., "I see here that you have a associated prior conviction for something referred to as 'Criminal Sodomy.' I could also be a poor, naive simpleton however I'm not quite sure what that fine and fancy lawyer-talk means in plain English. Please explain to the jury in simple terms what exactly you probably did to get convicted of that crime." See also, Argument from Ignorance, and The Third Person Effect. The Slippery Slope (additionally, the Domino Theory): The common fallacy that "one thing inevitably leads to a different." E.g., "When you two go and drink coffee collectively one thing will lead to a different and next factor you already know you'll be pregnant and find yourself spending your life on welfare dwelling in the Projects," or "If we shut Gitmo one thing will lead to a different and earlier than you understand it armed terrorists can be strolling by our church doorways with suicide belts, proud as you please, smack in the middle of the 10:30 a.m. Sunday worship service right right here in Garfield, Kansas!"</p><p>The Snow Job (also Falacia ad Verbosium; Information Bias): A fallacy of logos, "proving" a declare by overwhelming an viewers ("snowing them underneath") with mountains of true but marginally-related paperwork, graphs, words, info, numbers, information and statistics that look extremely spectacular but which the supposed audience can't be anticipated to know or properly consider. This can be a corrupted argument from logos. See also, "Lying with Statistics." The other of this fallacy is the Plain Truth Fallacy. The Soldiers' Honor Fallacy: The historic fallacy that every one who wore a uniform, fought exhausting and followed orders are worthy of some particular honor or glory or are even "heroes," whether or not they fought for freedom or fought to defend slavery, marched below Grant or Lee, Hitler, Stalin, Eisenhower or McArthur, fought to defend their homes, fought for oil or to spread empire, and even fought against and killed U.S. soldiers! A corrupt argument from ethos (that of a soldier), intently related to the "Finish the Job" fallacy ("Sure, he died for a lie, however he deserves honor because he followed orders and did his job faithfully to the tip!"). See additionally "Heroes All." This fallacy was recognized and decisively refuted at the Nuremburg Trials after World War II but remains highly effective to today nonetheless. See also "Blind Loyalty." Related is the State Actor Fallacy, that those that battle and die for his or her country (America, Russia, Iran, the Third Reich, etc.) are worthy of honor or at least pardonable whereas those who struggle for a non-state actor (armed abolitionists, guerrillas, freedom-fighters, jihadis, mujahideen) are not and remain "terrorists" regardless of how noble or vile their cause, till or unless they win and grow to be the recognized state, or are adopted by a state after the actual fact. The usual Version Fallacy: The historic fallacy, a discursive Argumentum advert Baculum, of choosing a "Standard Translation" or "Authorized Version" of an historic or sacred textual content and arbitrarily declaring it "right" and "authoritative," necessarily eliminating much of the poetry and underlying which means of the unique but conveniently quashing any further discussion in regards to the that means of the original textual content, e.g., the Vulgate or The King James Version. The easily demonstrable indisputable fact that translation (beyond three or four words) is neither uniform nor reversible (i.e., by no means comes back exactly the same when retranslated from another language) provides the lie to any efforts to make translation of human languages into an exact science. Islam clearly recognizes this fallacy when characterizing any attempt to translate the sacred textual content of the Holy Qur'an out of the unique Arabic as a "paraphrase" at absolute best. An obverse of this fallacy is the Argumentum advert Mysteriam, above. An extension of the usual Version Fallacy is the Monolingual Fallacy, at an instructional stage the fallacy of ignorantly assuming (as a monolingual individual) that transparent, in-depth translation between languages is the norm, and even doable in any respect, permitting one to conveniently and falsely ignore on a regular basis problems with translation when shut-studying translated literature or academic textual content and idea. At the popular degree the Monolingual Fallacy allows monolinguals to blithely demand that guests, migrants, refugees and newcomers be taught English, both earlier than arriving or else in a single day after arrival in the United States, while applying no such demand to themselves once they go to Asia, Europe, Latin America, and even French-speaking areas of Canada. Not not often, this fallacy descends into gross racism or ethnic discrimination, e.g., the demagogy of warning of "Spanish being spoken right right here on Main Street and taco trucks on every corner!" See also, Othering, and Dog-Whistle Politics. Star Power (also Testimonial, Questionable Authority, Faulty Use of Authority, Falacia ad Vericundiam; Eminence-based Practice): In academia and drugs, a corrupt argument from ethos in which arguments, standpoints and themes of professional discourse are granted fame and validity or condemned to obscurity solely by whoever may be the reigning "stars" or "premier journals" of the profession or discipline for the time being. E.g., "Foster's take on Network Theory has been completely criticized and is so final-week!.This week everybody's into Safe Spaces and Pierce's Theory of Microaggressions. Get with this system." (See additionally, the Bandwagon.) Also applies to an obsession with journal Impact Factors. At the favored stage this fallacy also refers to a corrupt argument from ethos through which public help for a standpoint or product is established by a well known or revered determine (i.e.,. a star athlete or entertainer) who isn't an knowledgeable and who may have been well paid to make the endorsement (e.g., "Olympic gold-medal pole-vaulter Fulano de Tal makes use of Quick Flush Internet--Shouldn’t you?" Or, "My favourite rock star warns that vaccinations unfold cooties, so I'm not vaccinating my kids!" ). Includes different false, meaningless or paid technique of associating oneself or one’s product or standpoint with the ethos of a famous particular person or occasion (e.g., "Try Salsa Cabria, the official taco sauce of the Winter Olympics!"). This fallacy additionally covers Faulty use of Quotes (also, The Devil Quotes Scripture), together with quoting out of context or against the clear intent of the original speaker or author. E.g., racists quoting and twisting the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s statements in favor of racial equality against contemporary activists and movements for racial equality. The Straw Man (also "The Straw Person" ""The Straw Figure"): The fallacy of organising a phony, weak, excessive or ridiculous parody of an opponent's argument and then proceeding to knock it down or scale back it to absurdity with a rhetorical wave of the hand. E.g., "Vegetarians say animals have emotions like you and me. Ever seen a cow snort at a Shakespeare comedy? Vegetarianism is nonsense!" Or, "Pro-choicers hate infants and need to kill them!" Or, "Pro-lifers hate women and need them to spend their lives barefoot, pregnant and chained to the kitchen stove!" A too-frequent instance of this fallacy is that of highlighting probably the most absurd, offensive, foolish or violent examples in a mass movement or demonstration, e.g. "Tree huggers" for environmentalists, "bra burners" for feminists, or "rioters" when there are a dozen violent crazies in a peaceful, disciplined demonstration of 1000's or tens of 1000's, and then falsely portraying these excessive examples as typical of the whole movement with the intention to condemn it with a wave of the hand. See additionally Olfactory Rhetoric. The Taboo (also, Dogmatism):: The ancient fallacy of unilaterally declaring certain "bedrock" arguments, assumptions, dogmas, standpoints or actions "sacrosanct" and not open to discussion, or arbitrarily taking some emotional tones, logical standpoints, doctrines or options "off the table" beforehand. (E.g., " "No, let's not discuss my sexuality," "Don't carry my drinking into this," or "Before we start, it is advisable to know I will not let you play the race card or permit you to attack my arguments by claiming 'That's just what Hitler would say!'") Also applies to discounting or rejecting sure arguments, facts and proof (and even experiences!) out of hand as a result of they're supposedly "against the Bible" or different sacred dogma (See additionally the A Priori Argument). This fallacy sometimes degenerates into a separate, distracting argument over who will get to outline the parameters, tones, dogmas and taboos of the main argument, though at this point reasoned discourse most frequently breaks down and your complete affair turns into a bare Argumentum ad Baculum. See additionally, MYOB, Tone Policing, and Calling "Cards." They're All Crooks: The frequent contemporary fallacy of refusing to get involved in public politics as a result of "all" politicians and politics are allegedly corrupt, ignoring the truth that if that is so in a democratic nation it is exactly because first rate individuals like you and that i refuse to get entangled, leaving the sector open to the "crooks" by default. An example of Circular Reasoning. Related to this fallacy is "They're All Biased," the extremely common contemporary cynical fallacy of ignoring news and news media because none tells the "goal truth" and all push some "agenda." This principally true statement logically requiring audiences to frequently view or learn a wide range of media sources in order to get any approximation of reality, but for many younger individuals in the present day (2017) it means in practice, "Ignore information, information media and public affairs altogether and as a substitute listen to something that is enjoyable, exciting or personally fascinating to you." The sinister implication for democracy is, "Mind your own business and leave all of the 'large' inquiries to your betters, those whose job is to deal with these questions and who're effectively paid to take action." See additionally the Third Person Effect, and Deliberate Ignorance. The "Third Person Effect" (also, "Wise up!" and "They're All Liars"): An instance of the fallacy of Deliberate Ignorance, the arch-cynical postmodern fallacy of intentionally discounting or ignoring media data a priori, opting to remain in ignorance reasonably than "listening to the lies" of the mainstream media, the President, the "medical establishment," professionals, professors, doctors and the "educational elite" or other authorities or data sources, even about pressing subjects (e.g., the necessity for vaccinations) on which these sources are in any other case publicly considered to be usually dependable or relatively trustworthy. In line with Drexel University researchers (2017), the "Third Person Effect ... suggests that individuals will perceive a mass media message to have more affect on others, than themselves. This notion tends to counteract the message's meant 'name-to-motion.' Basically, this suggests that over time people wised up to the truth that some mass media messages were meant to manipulate them -- so the messages grew to become much less and fewer effective." This fallacy appears to be opposite to and an overreaction to the large Lie Technique. See also, Deliberate Ignorance, the Simpleton's Fallacy, and Trust your Gut.</p><p>The "Thousand Flowers" Fallacy (also, "Take names and kick butt."): A complicated, trendy "Argumentum ad Baculum" in which free and open discussion and "brainstorming" are temporarily allowed and inspired (even demanded) within a corporation or nation not primarily so as to listen to and consider opposing views, however somewhat to "smoke out," identify and later punish, fireplace or liquidate dissenters or these not following the Party Line. The name comes from the Thousand Flowers Period in Chinese history when Communist leader Chairman Mao Tse Tung applied this coverage with deadly impact. Throwing Good Money After Bad (additionally, "Sunk Cost Fallacy"): In his glorious guide, Logically Fallacious (2015), Author Bo Bennett describes this fallacy as follows: "Reasoning that additional investment is warranted on the fact that the assets already invested shall be lost otherwise, not bearing in mind the overall losses involved in the further investment." In different words, risking further cash to "save" an earlier, losing funding, ignoring the previous axiom that "Doing the identical thing and anticipating totally different outcomes is the definition of insanity." E.g., "I can't stop betting now, as a result of I already bet the rent and lost, and that i need to win it again or my wife will kill me once i get home!" See also Argument from Inertia.</p><p>TINA (There is no such thing as a Alternative. Also the "Like it or Leave It" Fallacy; "Get over it," "Suck it up," "It's what it's," "Actions/Elections have consequences," or the "Fait Accompli"): A quite common contemporary extension of the both/or fallacy wherein somebody in power quashes vital thought by saying that there isn't any lifelike different to a given standpoint, status or motion, arbitrarily ruling any and all other choices out of bounds, or announcing that a choice has been made and any additional discussion is insubordination, disloyalty, treason, disobedience or simply a waste of valuable time when there's a job to be done. (See also, "Taboo;" "Finish the Job.") TINA is most frequently a bare power-play, a barely extra refined variety of the Argumentum advert Baculum. See additionally Appeal to Closure. Tone Policing. A corrupt argument from pathos and delivery, the fallacy of judging the validity of an argument primarily by its emotional tone of delivery, ignoring the truth that a legitimate fact or argument stays valid whether it is offered calmly and deliberatively or is shouted in a "shrill" or even "hysterical" tone, whether or not carefully written and published in skilled, tutorial language in a respected, peer-reviewed journal or screamed via a bull-horn and peppered with vulgarity. Conversely, a extremely pressing emotional matter is still urgent even if argued coldly and rationally. This fallacy creates a false dichotomy between motive and emotion and thus implicitly favors those who are usually not personally concerned or emotionally invested in an argument, e.g., "I know you are upset, but I will not discuss it with you till you calm down," or "I'd consider what you wrote had been it not for your adolescent overuse of exclamation points throughout the textual content." Or alternately, "You seem to be taking the death of your spouse way too calmly. You're below arrest for homicide. You've got the fitting to stay silent..." Tone Policing is frequent in contemporary discourse of power, significantly in response to discourse of protest, and is occasionally utilized in sexist methods, e.g. the accusation of being "shrill" is sort of at all times used against women, never against males. See also, The F-Bomb.</p><p>Transfer: (additionally, Name Dropping) A corrupt argument from ethos, falsely associating a famous or respected individual, place or thing with an unrelated thesis or standpoint (e.g. putting an image of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. on an advertisement for mattresses, using Genghis Khan, a Mongol who hated Chinese, as the name of a Chinese restaurant, or using the Texas flag to promote more vehicles or pickups in Texas that were made in Detroit, Kansas City or Korea). This fallacy is widespread in contemporary academia within the form of utilizing a profusion of scholarly-wanting citations from respected authorities to lend a false gravitas to in any other case specious ideas or textual content. See also "Star Power." Trust your Gut (additionally, Trust your Heart; Trust Your Feelings; Trust your Intuition; Trust your Instincts; Emotional Reasoning): A corrupt argument from pathos, the historic fallacy of relying primarily on "gut feelings" slightly than purpose or evidence to make choices. A current (2017) Ohio State University examine finds, unsurprisingly, that individuals who "belief their gut" are considerably extra vulnerable to falling for "fake news," phony conspiracy theories, frauds and scams than those who insist on hard evidence or logic. See also Deliberate Ignorance, the Affective Fallacy, and The "Third Person Effect."</p><p>Tu Quoque ("You Do it Too!"; also, Two Wrongs Make a Right): A corrupt argument from ethos, the fallacy of defending a shaky or false standpoint or excusing one's personal dangerous motion by declaring that one's opponent's acts, ideology or personal character are additionally open to query, or are even perhaps worse than one's own. E.g., "Sure, we may have tortured prisoners and killed youngsters with drones, however we don't minimize off heads like they do!" Or, "You can't stand there and accuse me of corruption! You guys are all into politics and you already know what we should do to get reelected!" Unusual, self-deprecating variants on this fallacy are the Ego / Nos Quoque Fallacies ("I / we do it too!"), minimizing or defending one other's evil actions because I'm / we are responsible of the identical thing or of even worse. E.g., In response to allegations that Russian Premier Vladimir Putin is a "killer," American President Donald Trump (2/2017) advised an interviewer, "There are a lot of killers. We've obtained a number of killers. What, do you think our nation's so innocent?" This fallacy is said to the Red Herring and to the Ad Hominem Argument.</p><p>Two-sides Fallacy (additionally, Teach the Controversy): The presentation of an issue that makes it seem to have two sides of equal weight or significance, when in truth a consensus or a lot stronger argument helps only one facet. Also known as "false balance" or "false equivalence." (Due to Teaching Tolerance for this definition!) E.g,. "Scientists theorize that the Earth is a sphere, however there are all the time two sides to any argument: Others consider that the Earth is flat and is perched on the again of a large turtle, and a truly balanced presentation of the problem requires teaching each explanations with out bias or unduly favoring both side over the other." Two Truths (also, Compartmentalization; Epistemically Closed Systems; Alternative Truth): A very corrupt and harmful fallacy of logos and ethos, first formally described in medieval times however nonetheless widespread in the present day, holding that there exists one "truth" in one given environment (e.g., in science, work or faculty) and concurrently a distinct, formally contradictory however equally true "fact" in a distinct epistemic system, context, atmosphere, intended viewers or discourse neighborhood (e.g., in a single's religion or at residence). This may result in a state of affairs of stable cognitive dissonance the place, as UC Irvine scholar Dr. Carter T. Butts describes it (2016), "I know but do not believe," making rational discussion tough, painful or unattainable. This fallacy additionally describes the discourse of politicians who cynically proclaim one "reality" as mere "campaign rhetoric" used "to mobilize the bottom," or "for domestic consumption only," and a quite different and contradictory "truth" for extra common or practical functions once in office. See also Disciplinary Blinders; Alternative Truth. Venting (additionally, Letting off Steam; Loose Lips): In the Venting fallacy an individual argues that her/his phrases are or should be exempt from criticism or consequence as a result of s/he was "solely venting," although this very admission implies that the one "venting" was, at lengthy final, freely expressing his/her true, heartfelt and uncensored opinion about the matter in query. This same fallacy applies to minimizing, denying the importance of or excusing different forms of frank, unguarded or uninhibited offensive expression as mere "Locker-room Talk," "Alpha-male Speech" or nothing but cute, adorable, perhaps even sexy "Bad-boy Talk." See additionally, the Affective Fallacy. Opposite to this fallacy are the fallacies of Political Correctness and the Scripted Message, above.</p><p>Venue: The ancient fallacy of Venue, a corrupt argument from kairos, falsely and arbitrarily invalidates an in any other case-valid argument or piece of evidence because it is supposedly supplied within the wrong place, on the incorrect moment or in an inappropriate courtroom, medium or discussion board. Based on PhD scholar Amanda Thran, "Quite often, people will say to me in person that Facebook, Twitter, etc. are 'not the proper forums' for discussing politically and socially sensitive points. ... In this similar vein, I’ve additionally encountered the following argument: 'Facebook, which is used for sharing wedding ceremony, child, and pet photographs, is an inappropriate place for political discourse; people don’t wished to be burdened with that after they log in.' In my experience, this line of reasoning is most often employed (and abused) to shut down a dialog when one feels they are dropping it. Ironically, I have seen it used when the argument has already been transpiring on the platform [in] an already lengthy dialogue." See additionally Disciplinary Blinders. We Have to Do Something: (also, the Placebo Effect; Political Theater; Security Theater; We should send a message): The harmful contemporary fallacy that when "People are scared / Persons are offended / Persons are fed up / Individuals are hurting / People need change" it becomes necessary to do one thing, something, without delay without stopping to ask "What?" or "Why?", even if what is completed is an overreaction, is a completely ineffective sham, an inert placebo, or truly makes the situation worse, somewhat than "just sitting there doing nothing." (E.g., "Banning air passengers from carrying ham sandwiches onto the airplane and making parents take off their newborn infants' tiny pink child-shoes most likely does nothing to deter potential terrorists, but persons are scared and we need to do something to answer this crisis!") This is a badly corrupted argument from pathos. (See also "Scare Tactic" and "The large 'But' Fallacy.")</p><p>Where there’s Smoke, there’s Fire (additionally Hasty Conclusion; Jumping to a Conclusion): The harmful fallacy of ignorantly drawing a snap conclusion and/or taking motion with out sufficient evidence. E.g., "Captain! The man sitting subsequent to me in coach has dark pores and skin and is studying a ebook in some kind of funny language all filled with accent marks, bizarre squiggles above the "N's" and upside-down question marks. It have to be Arabic! Get him off the plane earlier than he blows us all to kingdom come!" A wide range of the "Just in Case" fallacy. The alternative of this fallacy is the "Paralysis of Analysis."</p><p>The Wisdom of the crowd (also, The Magic of the Market; the Wikipedia Fallacy; Crowdsourcing): A quite common contemporary fallacy that people could also be improper but "the group" or "the market" is infallible, ignoring historic examples like witch-burning, lynching, and the market crash of 2008. This fallacy is why most American schools and universities at the moment (2017) ban college students from using Wikipedia as a critical reference supply.</p><p>The Worst-Case Fallacy (additionally, "Just in case;" "We can't afford to take possibilities;" "An abundance of warning;" "Better Safe than Sorry;" "Better to prevent than to lament."): A pessimistic fallacy by which one’s reasoning is based on an improbable, far-fetched and even completely imaginary worst-case scenario quite than on actuality. This plays on pathos (concern) rather than motive, and is usually politically motivated. E.g., "What if armed terrorists had been to assault your county grain elevator tomorrow morning at daybreak? Are you able to struggle again? Better stock up on assault rifles and ammunition right this moment, simply in case!" See also Scare Tactics. The other of this is the Positive Thinking Fallacy. The Worst Negates the Bad (also, Be Grateful for What You've Got): The extraordinarily frequent modern logical fallacy that an objectively bad situation someway is not so bad just because it may have been far worse, or because somebody, someplace has it even worse. E.g., "I cried as a result of I had no footwear, till I saw somebody who had no feet." Or, "You're protesting since you earn only $7.25 an hour? You can simply as easily be out on the road! I occur to know there are folks in Uttar Pradesh who're doing the very same work you are doing for one tenth of what you're making, they usually're pathetically glad just to have work in any respect. You'll want to shut up, put down that picket signal, get back to work for what I care to pay you, and thank me each and every single day for providing you with a job!" Zero Tolerance (additionally, Zero Risk Bias, Broken Windows Policing, Disproportionate Response; Even One is simply too Many; Exemplary Punishment; Judenrein): The contemporary fallacy of declaring an "emergency" and promising to disregard justice and due course of and commit limitless assets (and sometimes, limitless cruelty) to stamp out a restricted, insignificant or even nonexistent drawback. E.g., "I just read about an actual case of cannibalism somewhere in this country. That's disgusting, and even one case is means, manner too many! We want a Federal Taskforce in opposition to Cannibalism with one million-greenback finances and offices in every state, a nationwide SCAN program in all of the grade faculties (Stop Cannibalism in America Now!), and an automated double demise penalty for cannibals; in different phrases, zero tolerance for cannibalism on this nation!" This can be a corrupt and cynical argument from pathos, virtually at all times politically pushed, a very sinister variety of Dog Whistle Politics and the "We Should do Something" fallacy. See additionally, "Playing on Emotions," "Red Herring," and also the "Big Lie Technique." OW 7/06 with thanks to the late Susan Spence. Final revision 1/18, with particular due to Business Insider, Teaching Tolerance, and Vox.com, to Bradley Steffens, to Jackson Katz, Brian Resnick, Glen Greenwald, Lara Bhasin, Danelle M. Pecht, Marc Lawson, Eimar O'Duffy, and Mike Caetano, to Dr. William Lorimer, Dr. Carter T. Butts, Dr. Bo Bennett, Myron Peto, Joel Sax, Thomas Persing, Amanda Thran, and to all the others who advised corrections, additions and clarifications. Links to Amazon.com on this page are for reader convenience only, and no endorsement is obtainable or implied. This list is now not being maintained, but please proceed to copy, mirror, update and share it freely.</p><p>In case you loved this information and you wish to receive details concerning <a href="https://yorikoh2.com/">yorikoh2.com</a> i implore you to visit our webpage.</p>
Lăsați necompletat pentru a utiliza valoarea potrivită cu textul integral ca rezumatul.
Document Notes
<p>Argumentum advert Baculum ("Argument from the Club." Also, "Argumentum ad Baculam," "Argument from Strength," "Muscular Leadership," "Non-negotiable Demands," "Hard Power," Bullying, The facility-Play, Fascism, Resolution by Force of Arms, Shock and Awe.): The fallacy of "persuasion" or "proving one is true" by force, violence, brutality, terrorism, superior energy, uncooked military would possibly, or threats of violence. E.g., "Gimmee your wallet or I'll knock your head off!" or "We've got the right proper to take your land, since we have now the big guns and you don't." Also applies to oblique types of risk. E.g., "Surrender your foolish pleasure, kneel down and accept our religion today if you don't need to burn in hell without end and ever!" A mainly discursive Argumentum ad Baculum is that of forcibly silencing opponents, ruling them "out of order," blocking, censoring or jamming their message, or just talking over them or/speaking more loudly than they do, this final a tactic significantly attributed to males in blended-gender discussions. Argumentum ad Mysteriam ("Argument from Mystery;" additionally Mystagogy.): A darkened chamber, incense, chanting or drumming, bowing and kneeling, special robes or headgear, holy rituals and massed voices reciting sacred mysteries in an unknown tongue have a quasi-hypnotic impact and may usually persuade extra strongly than any logical argument. The Puritan Reformation was in giant part a rejection of this fallacy. When used knowingly and deliberately this fallacy is particularly vicious and accounts for among the fearsome persuasive power of cults. An example of an Argumentum advert Mysteriam is the "Long ago and far Away" fallacy, the fact that details, proof, practices or arguments from historical times, distant lands and/or "exotic" cultures seem to acquire a particular gravitas or ethos merely because of their antiquity, language or origin, e.g., publicly chanting Holy Scriptures in their authentic (most often incomprehensible) historical languages, preferring the Greek, Latin, Assyrian or Old Slavonic Christian Liturgies over their vernacular versions, or using classic or newly invented Greek and Latin names for fallacies in order to support their validity. See additionally, Esoteric Knowledge. An obverse of the Argumentum advert Mysteriam is the standard Version Fallacy.</p><p>Argumentum ex Silentio (Argument from Silence): The fallacy that if available sources stay silent or current data and proof can show nothing about a given subject or query this truth in itself proves the truth of one's claim. E.g., "Science can inform us nothing about God. That proves God does not exist." Or "Science admits it will probably tell us nothing about God, so that you can't deny that God exists!" Often misused in the American justice system, where, contrary to the 5th Amendment and the authorized presumption of innocence until proven responsible, remaining silent or "taking the Fifth" is often falsely portrayed as proof of guilt. E.g., "Mr. Hixon can offer no alibi for his whereabouts the night of January 15th. This proves that he was in reality in room 331 at the Smuggler's Inn, murdering his wife with a hatchet!" In in the present day's America, choosing to stay silent within the face of a police officer's questions could make one guilty sufficient to be arrested or even shot. See additionally, Argument from Ignorance. Availability Bias (also, Attention Bias, Anchoring Bias): A fallacy of logos stemming from the pure tendency to offer undue attention and importance to information that's immediately accessible at hand, significantly the primary or final information received, and to minimize or ignore broader knowledge or wider proof that clearly exists but just isn't as easily remembered or accessed. E.g., "We know from experience that this would not work," when "experience" means the latest native try, ignoring overwhelming expertise from different places and times where it has worked and does work. Also associated is the fallacy of Hyperbole [also, Magnification, or generally Catastrophizing] the place an instantaneous instance is immediately proclaimed "the most vital in all of human historical past," or the "worst in the entire world!" This latter fallacy works extremely effectively with much less-educated audiences and those whose "entire world" may be very small indeed, audiences who "hate history" and whose historic memory spans a number of weeks at best.</p><p>The Bandwagon Fallacy (additionally, Argument from Common Sense, Argumentum advert Populum): The fallacy of arguing that as a result of "everybody," "the people," or "the majority" (or somebody in energy who has widespread backing) supposedly thinks or does one thing, it must due to this fact be true and right. E.g., "Whether there actually is giant scale voter fraud in America or not, many individuals now suppose there may be and that makes it so." Sometimes additionally consists of Lying with Statistics, e.g. "Over 75% of Americans consider that crooked Bob Hodiak is a thief, a liar and a pervert. There may not be any evidence, but for anyone with half a brain that conclusively proves that Crooked Bob should go to jail! Lock him up! Lock him up!" This is sometimes mixed with the "Argumentum ad Baculum," e.g., "Like it or not, it is time to choose sides: Are you going to get on board the bandwagon with everyone else, or get crushed underneath the wheels as it goes by?" Or in the 2017 words of former White House spokesperson Sean Spicer, ""They should either get with the program or they will go," A contemporary digital type of the Bandwagon Fallacy is the information Cascade, "in which people echo the opinions of others, often online, even when their own opinions or exposure to info contradicts that opinion. When info cascades type a sample, this sample can begin to overpower later opinions by making it seem as if a consensus already exists." (Due to Teaching Tolerance for this definition!) See also Wisdom of the group, and The massive Lie Technique. For the alternative of this fallacy see the Romantic Rebel fallacy. The big Brain/Little Brain Fallacy (additionally, the Führerprinzip; Mad Leader Disease): A not-unusual however excessive instance of the Blind Loyalty Fallacy below, in which a tyrannical boss, navy commander, or religious or cult-leader tells followers "Don't assume along with your little brains (the brain in your head), however with your Big mind (mine)." This last is generally expressed in constructive phrases, i.e., "You don't have to fret and stress out in regards to the rightness or wrongness of what you might be doing since I, the Leader. am assuming all ethical and legal duty for all your actions. So lengthy as you are faithfully following orders without query I'll defend you and gladly settle for all the consequences up to and including eternal damnation if I'm fallacious." The other of this is the fallacy of "Plausible Deniability." See additionally, "Just Do It!", and "Gaslighting." The large "But" Fallacy (additionally, Special Pleading): The fallacy of enunciating a generally-accepted principle and then immediately negating it with a "however." Often this takes the form of the "Special Case," which is supposedly exempt from the same old rules of law, logic, morality, ethics or even credibility E.g., "As Americans we now have always believed on precept that every human being has God-given, inalienable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, together with in the case of criminal accusations a good and speedy trial before a jury of 1's peers. But, your crime was so unspeakable and a trial would be so problematic for nationwide security that it justifies locking you up for life in Guantanamo without trial, conviction or risk of attraction." Or, "Yes, Honey, I still love you greater than life itself, and I do know that in my marriage ceremony vows I promised earlier than God that I'd forsake all others and be faithful to you 'till loss of life do us half,' but you might have to know, this was a particular case..." See also, "Shopping Hungry," and "We Have to do Something!" The large Lie Technique (additionally the Bold Faced Lie; "Staying on Message."): The contemporary fallacy of repeating a lie, fallacy, slogan, talking-level, nonsense-assertion or misleading half-truth over and over in several kinds (significantly within the media) till it turns into part of every day discourse and folks accept it without additional proof or evidence. Sometimes the bolder and extra outlandish the big Lie becomes the more credible it seems to a willing, most frequently angry audience. E.g., "What in regards to the Jewish Problem?" Note that when this particular phony debate was happening there was no "Jewish Problem," only a Nazi Problem, however hardly anyone in energy recognized or wished to talk about that, while far too many unusual Germans had been only too ready to find a handy scapegoat to blame for his or her suffering throughout the great Depression. Writer Miles J. Brewer expertly demolishes The large Lie Technique in his basic (1930) brief story, "The Gostak and the Doshes." However, extra contemporary examples of the large Lie fallacy may be the fully fictitious August 4, 1964 "Tonkin Gulf Incident" concocted below Lyndon Johnson as a false justification for escalating the Vietnam War, or the non-existent "Weapons of Mass Destruction" in Iraq (conveniently abbreviated "WMD's" in an effort to lend this Big Lie a legitimizing, army-sounding "Alphabet Soup" ethos), used in 2003 as a false justification for the Second Gulf War. The November, 2016 U.S. President-elect's assertion that "tens of millions" of ineligible votes were forged in that 12 months's American. presidential election seems to be a basic Big Lie. See also, Alternative Truth; The Bandwagon Fallacy, the Straw Man, Alphabet Soup, and Propaganda. Blind Loyalty (additionally Blind Obedience, Unthinking Obedience, the "Team Player" enchantment, the Nuremberg Defense): The dangerous fallacy that an argument or action is correct merely and solely because a respected chief or supply (a President, professional, one’s parents, one's own "aspect," workforce or country, one’s boss or commanding officers) says it is correct. That is over-reliance on authority, a gravely corrupted argument from ethos that puts loyalty above fact, above one's personal motive and above conscience. In this case a person makes an attempt to justify incorrect, stupid or criminal conduct by whining "That's what I used to be told to do," or "I was simply following orders." See additionally, The big Brain/Little Brain Fallacy, and The "Soldiers' Honor" Fallacy. Blood is Thicker than Water (additionally Favoritism; Compadrismo; "For my buddies, anything."): The reverse of the "Ad Hominem" fallacy, a corrupt argument from ethos where a press release, argument or motion is robotically thought to be true, right and above problem as a result of one is said to, knows and likes, or is on the identical staff or side, or belongs to the same religion, occasion, club or fraternity as the person concerned. (E.g., "My brother-in-legislation says he noticed you goofing off on the job. You're a tough worker however who am I going to consider, you or him? You're fired!") See additionally the Identity Fallacy. Brainwashing (also, Propaganda, "Radicalization."): The Cold War-period fantasy that an enemy can instantly win over or "radicalize" an unsuspecting audience with their vile however one way or the other unspeakably persuasive "propaganda," e.g., "Don't take a look at that website! They're attempting to brainwash you with their propaganda!" Historically, "brainwashing" refers more correctly to the inhuman Argumentum ad Baculum of "beating an argument into" a prisoner by way of a mix of ache, worry, sensory or sleep deprivation, extended abuse and refined psychological manipulation (also, the "Stockholm Syndrome."). Such "brainwashing" will also be accomplished by pleasure ("Love Bombing,"); e.g., "Did you want that? I do know you did. Well, there's lots extra the place that got here from once you signal on with us!" (See also, "Bribery.") An unspeakably sinister form of persuasion by brainwashing includes deliberately addicting a person to medication after which offering or withholding the substance depending on the addict's compliance. Note: Only the other facet brainwashes. "We" by no means brainwash. Bribery (additionally, Material Persuasion, Material Incentive, Financial Incentive). The fallacy of "persuasion" by bribery, gifts or favors is the reverse of the Argumentum ad Baculum. As is well known, someone who's persuaded by bribery hardly ever "stays persuaded" in the long term until the bribes keep on coming in and rising with time. See also Appeasement. Calling "Cards": A contemporary fallacy of logos, arbitrarily and falsely dismissing acquainted or simply-anticipated however legitimate, reasoned objections to one's standpoint with a wave of the hand, as mere "playing cards" in some kind of "game" of rhetoric, e.g. "Don't try to play the 'Race Card' towards me," or "She's taking part in the 'Woman Card' again," or "That 'Hitler Card' won't rating with me in this argument." See also, The Taboo, and Political Correctness. Circular Reasoning (additionally, The Vicious Circle; Catch 22, Begging the Question, Circulus in Probando): A fallacy of logos where A is because of B, and B is because of A, e.g., "You cannot get a job without experience, and you cannot get expertise and not using a job." Also refers to falsely arguing that something is true by repeating the identical statement in several phrases. E.g., "The witchcraft downside is essentially the most urgent spiritual crisis on the earth at present. Why? Because witches threaten our very eternal salvation." A corrupt argument from logos. See also the "Big Lie method." The Complex Question: The contemporary fallacy of demanding a direct answer to a question that cannot be answered with out first analyzing or difficult the premise of the query itself. E.g., "Just reply me 'yes' or 'no': Did you assume you could possibly get away with plagiarism and not undergo the results?" Or, "Why did you rob that financial institution?" Also applies to conditions where one is pressured to either settle for or reject advanced standpoints or propositions containing each acceptable and unacceptable elements. A corruption of the argument from logos. A counterpart of Either/Or Reasoning. Confirmation Bias: A fallacy of logos, the widespread tendency to note, search out, select and share evidence that confirms one's personal standpoint and beliefs, as opposed to opposite evidence. This fallacy is how "fortune tellers" work--If I am advised I'll meet a "tall, dark stranger" I will be on the lookout for a tall, dark stranger, and when i meet somebody even marginally meeting that description I'll marvel on the correctness of the "psychic's" prediction. In contemporary times Confirmation Bias is most frequently seen in the tendency of assorted audiences to "curate their political environments, subsisting on one-sided information diets and [even] selecting into politically homogeneous neighborhoods" (Michael A. Neblo et al., 2017, Science magazine). Confirmation Bias (additionally, Homophily) means that people are inclined to search out and comply with solely those media shops that confirm their common ideological and cultural biases, typically to an degree that leads a the false (implicit or even specific) conclusion that "everyone" agrees with that bias and that anybody who doesn't is "loopy," "looney," evil and even "radicalized." See additionally, "Half Truth," and "Defensiveness." Cost Bias: A fallacy of ethos (that of a product), the truth that one thing expensive (either in terms of money, or one thing that is "arduous fought" or "arduous gained" or for which one "paid dearly") is generally valued more highly than something obtained free or cheaply, whatever the item's real quality, utility or true value to the purchaser. E. g., "Hey, I labored arduous to get this car! It could also be nothing but a clunker that cannot make it up a steep hill, but it's mine, and to me it's better than some millionaire's limo." Also applies to judging the standard of a consumer merchandise (or even of its proprietor!) primarily by the merchandise's brand, worth, label or source, e.g., "Hey, you there within the Jay-Mart swimsuit! Har-har!" or, "Ooh, she's driving a Mercedes!" Default Bias: (additionally, Normalization of Evil, "Deal with it;" "If it ain't broke, don't repair it;" Acquiescence; "Making one's peace with the state of affairs;" "Get used to it;" "Whatever is, is true;" "It is what it is;" "Let it's, let or not it's;" "This is the better of all attainable worlds [or, the one possible world];" "Better the satan you realize than the satan you don't."): The logical fallacy of automatically favoring or accepting a situation simply because it exists proper now, and arguing that any other different is mad, unthinkable, unimaginable, or at least would take too much effort, expense, stress or danger to alter. The opposite of this fallacy is that of Nihilism ("Tear it all down!"), blindly rejecting what exists in favor of what might be, the adolescent fantasy of romanticizing anarchy, chaos (an ideology generally referred to as political "Chaos Theory"), disorder, "permanent revolution," or change for change's sake. Defensiveness (additionally, Choice-support Bias: Myside Bias): A fallacy of ethos (one's personal), through which after one has taken a given decision, dedication or course of action, one mechanically tends to defend that decision and to irrationally dismiss opposing choices even when one's decision later on proves to be shaky or flawed. E.g., "Yeah, I voted for Snith. Sure, he turned out to be a crook and a liar and he acquired us into struggle, but I still say that at that time he was better than the out there alternate options!" See also "Argument from Inertia" and "Confirmation Bias." Deliberate Ignorance: (also, Closed-mindedness; "I don't desire to hear it!"; Motivated Ignorance; Tuning Out; Hear No Evil, See No Evil, Speak No Evil [The Three Monkeys' Fallacy]): As described by creator and commentator Brian Resnik on Vox.com (2017), that is the fallacy of merely choosing not to pay attention, "tuning out" or turning off any information, proof or arguments that problem one's beliefs, ideology, standpoint, or peace of mind, following the popular humorous dictum: "Don't attempt to confuse me with the details; my thoughts is made up!" This seemingly innocuous fallacy has enabled essentially the most vicious tyrannies and abuses over history, and continues to do so right now. See also Trust your Gut, Confirmation Bias, The Third Person Effect, "They're All Crooks," the Simpleton's Fallacy, and The Positive Thinking Fallacy. Diminished Responsibility: The common contemporary fallacy of making use of a specialized judicial idea (that criminal punishment should be much less if one's judgment was impaired) to reality on the whole. E.g., "You can't rely me absent on Monday--I was hung over and couldn't come to class so it's not my fault." Or, "Yeah, I was dashing on the freeway and killed a guy, however I used to be buzzed out of my thoughts and did not know what I used to be doing so it did not matter that much." In reality the demise does matter very a lot to the victim, to his household and friends and to society usually. Whether the perpetrator was high or not does not matter in any respect since the material outcomes are the same. This also consists of the fallacy of Panic, a quite common contemporary fallacy that one's phrases or actions, no matter how damaging or evil, by some means do not "rely" as a result of "I panicked!" This fallacy is rooted within the confusion of "penalties" with "punishment." See also "Venting." Disciplinary Blinders: A very common contemporary scholarly or skilled fallacy of ethos (that of one's self-discipline, career or educational discipline), routinely disregarding, discounting or ignoring a priori in any other case-relevant analysis, arguments and evidence that come from exterior one's own professional discipline, discourse neighborhood or educational space of examine. E.g., "That is perhaps relevant or not, but it is so not what we're doing in our area proper now." See additionally, "Star Power" and "Two Truths." An analogous fallacy is that of Denominational Blinders, arbitrarily ignoring or waving aside with out critical consideration any arguments or dialogue about faith, morality, ethics, spirituality, the Divine or the afterlife that come from outdoors one's own particular religious denomination or religion tradition. Dog-Whistle Politics: An extreme version of reductionism and sloganeering in the general public sphere, a contemporary fallacy of logos and pathos wherein a brief phrase or slogan of the hour, e.g., "Abortion," "The 1%," "9/11," "Zionism,""Chain Migration," "Islamic Terrorism," "Fascism," "Communism," "Big government," "Taco trucks!", "Tax and tax and spend and spend," "Gun violence," "Gun control," "Freedom of selection," "Lock 'em up,", "Amnesty," and many others. is flung out as "pink meat" or "chum in the water" that reflexively sends one's viewers right into a snapping, foaming-at-the-mouth feeding-frenzy. Any reasoned try to more clearly determine, deconstruct or problem an opponent's "canine whistle" enchantment leads to puzzled confusion at greatest and wild, irrational fury at worst. "Dog whistles" differ extensively in several locations, moments and cultural milieux, and they alter and lose or acquire energy so rapidly that even latest historic texts typically become extraordinarily troublesome to interpret. A common however unhappy instance of the fallacy of Dog Whistle Politics is that of candidate "debaters" of differing political shades simply blowing a succession of discursive "canine whistles" at their viewers as a substitute of addressing, refuting or even bothering to listen to one another's arguments, a state of affairs resulting in contemporary (2017) allegations that the political Right and Left in America are talking "different languages" when they're simply blowing different "dog whistles." See also, Reductionism.. The "Draw Your own Conclusion" Fallacy (also the Non-argument Argument; Let the Facts Speak for Themselves). In this fallacy of logos an in any other case uninformed viewers is introduced with carefully chosen and groomed, "shocking information" and then prompted to instantly "draw their own conclusions." E.g., "Crime rates are greater than twice as high amongst center-class Patzinaks than amongst any other comparable population group--draw your personal conclusions." It's well-known that these who're allowed to "come to their very own conclusions" are usually much more strongly convinced than these who are given both proof and conclusion up entrance. However, Dr. William Lorimer points out that "The only rational response to the non-argument is 'So what?' i.e. 'What do you assume you have proved, and why/how do you think you've proved it?'" Closely associated (if not similar) to this is the nicely-identified "Leading the Witness" Fallacy, the place a sham, sarcastic or biased question is asked solely in order to evoke a desired answer. The Dunning-Kruger Effect: A cognitive bias that leads folks of restricted abilities or knowledge to mistakenly imagine their abilities are better than they really are. (Because of Teaching Tolerance for this definition!) E.g., "I do know Washington was the Father of His Country and never told a lie, Pocahontas was the primary Native American, Lincoln freed the slaves, Hitler murdered six million Jews, Susan B. Anthony gained equal rights for girls, and Martin Luther King said "I've a dream!" Moses parted the Red Sea, Caesar stated "Et tu, Brute?" and the one cause America didn't win the Vietnam War hands-down like we at all times do was as a result of they tied our generals' fingers and the politicians reduce and run. See? Why do I must take a historical past course? I know every part about historical past!" E" for Effort. (also Noble Effort; I'm Trying My Best; The Lost Cause): The widespread contemporary fallacy of ethos that one thing should be right, true, helpful, or worthy of respect and honor solely as a result of one (or another person) has put so much honest good-religion effort and even sacrifice and bloodshed into it. (See additionally Appeal to Pity; Argument from Inertia; Heroes All; or Sob Story). An excessive example of this fallacy is Waving the Bloody Shirt (also, the "Blood of the Martyrs" Fallacy), the fallacy that a trigger or argument, irrespective of how questionable or reprehensible, cannot be questioned without dishonoring the blood and sacrifice of those that died so nobly for that trigger. E.g., "Defend the patriotic gore / That flecked the streets of Baltimore..." (from the official Maryland State Song). See additionally Cost Bias, The Soldier's Honor Fallacy, and the Argument from Inertia. Either/Or Reasoning: (also False Dilemma, All or Nothing Thinking; False Dichotomy, Black/White Fallacy, False Binary): A fallacy of logos that falsely affords solely two potential options regardless that a broad range of possible alternate options, variations and combinations are all the time readily accessible. E.g., "Either you are 100% Simon Straightarrow or you might be as queer as a 3 dollar invoice--it is as simple as that and there's no middle ground!" Or, "Either you’re in with us all the best way or you’re a hostile and must be destroyed! What's it gonna be?" Or, if your performance is anything wanting excellent, you consider your self an abject failure. Also applies to falsely contrasting one option or case to a different that is not likely opposed, e.g., falsely opposing "Black Lives Matter" to "Blue Lives Matter" when in actual fact not just a few police officers are themselves African American, and African Americans and police should not (or ought to not be!) pure enemies. Or, falsely posing a selection of both helping needy American veterans or helping needy international refugees, when the truth is in as we speak's United States there are ample assets available to easily do each ought to we care to take action. See additionally, Overgeneralization. Equivocation: The fallacy of intentionally failing to outline one's phrases, or knowingly and intentionally using phrases in a unique sense than the one the audience will understand. (E.g., President Bill Clinton stating that he did not have sexual relations with "that lady," meaning no sexual penetration, knowing full nicely that the audience will perceive his assertion as "I had no sexual contact of any form with that girl.") This can be a corruption of the argument from logos, and a tactic usually used in American jurisprudence. Historically, this referred to a tactic used in the course of the Reformation-period religious wars in Europe, when folks had been pressured to swear loyalty to at least one or another aspect and did as demanded via "equivocation," i.e., "After i solemnly swore true religion and allegiance to the King I actually meant to King Jesus, King of Kings, and to not the evil usurper squatting on the throne at the moment." This latter type of fallacy is excessively rare in the present day when the swearing of oaths has turn out to be effectively meaningless besides as obscenity or as speech formally subject to perjury penalties in authorized or judicial settings. The Eschatological Fallacy: The historic fallacy of arguing, "This world is coming to an end, so..." Popularly refuted by the observation that "Since the world is coming to an finish you will not want your life savings anyhow, so why not give it all to me?" Esoteric Knowledge (also Esoteric Wisdom; Gnosticism; Inner Truth; the Inner Sanctum; Have to Know): A fallacy from logos and ethos, that there is some knowledge reserved just for the Wise, the Holy or the Enlightened, (or these with proper Security Clearance), issues that the lots can not understand and do not deserve to know, at the least not till they turn into wiser, more trusted or extra "spiritually superior." The counterpart of this fallacy is that of Obscurantism (additionally Obscurationism, or Willful Ignorance), that (nearly always stated in a basso profundo voice) "There are some things that we mere mortals should by no means search to know!" E.g., "Scientific experiments that violate the privacy of the marital bed and expose the deep and private mysteries of human sexual habits to the tough gentle of science are obscene, sinful and morally evil. There are some things that we as people are merely not meant to know!" For the alternative of this latter, see the "Plain Truth Fallacy." See additionally, Argumentum advert Mysteriam. Essentializing: A fallacy of logos that proposes an individual or thing "is what it's and that’s all that it's," and at its core will always be the way in which it is correct now (E.g., "All terrorists are monsters, and can nonetheless be terrorist monsters even if they stay to be 100," or "'The poor you will always have with you,' so any effort to eliminate poverty is pointless."). Also refers to the fallacy of arguing that one thing is a certain method "by nature," an empty claim that no quantity of proof can refute. (E.g., "Americans are chilly and greedy by nature," or "Women are naturally better cooks than men.") See also "Default Bias." The other of this is Relativizing, the usually postmodern fallacy of blithely dismissing any and all arguments towards one's standpoint by shrugging one's shoulders and responding " Whatever..., I do not really feel like arguing about it;" "All of it relies upon...;" "That's your opinion; all the things's relative;" or falsely invoking Einstein's Theory of Relativity, Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle, Quantum Weirdness or the speculation of Multiple Universes to be able to confuse, mystify or "refute" an opponent. See additionally, "Red Herring" and "Appeal to Nature." The Etymological Fallacy: (additionally, "The Underlying Meaning"): A fallacy of logos, drawing false conclusions from the (most frequently long-forgotten) linguistic origins of a present phrase, or the alleged meanings or associations of that word in another language. E.g., "As utilized in physics, electronics and electrical engineering the term 'hysteresis' is grossly sexist because it originally got here from the Greek phrase for 'uterus' or 'womb.'" Or, "I refuse to eat fish! Don't you already know that the French word for "fish" is 'poisson,' which looks simply like the English phrase 'poison'? And doesn't that counsel something to you?" Famously, postmodern philosopher Jacques Derrida performed on this fallacy at nice size in his (1968) "Plato's Pharmacy." The Excluded Middle: A corrupted argument from logos that proposes that since a little of one thing is sweet, more must be higher (or that if less of one thing is good, none at all is even better). E.g., "If eating an apple a day is nice for you, consuming an all-apple diet is even better!" or "If a low fats food plan prolongs your life, a no-fat diet should make you live without end!" An reverse of this fallacy is that of Excluded Outliers, where one arbitrarily discards proof, examples or results that disprove one's standpoint by simply describing them as "Weird," "Outliers," or "Atypical." See also, "The big 'But' Fallacy." Also opposite is the Middle of the Road Fallacy (additionally, Falacia advert Temperantiam; "The Politics of the center;" Marginalization of the Adversary), where one demonstrates the "reasonableness" of one's personal standpoint (irrespective of how extreme) not by itself merits, but solely or primarily by presenting it as the one "average" path amongst two or more clearly unacceptable extreme alternatives. E.g., anti-Communist scholar Charles Roig (1979) notes that Vladimir Lenin efficiently argued for Bolshevism in Russia as the only available "reasonable" middle path between bomb-throwing Nihilist terrorists on the ultra-left and a corrupt and hated Czarist autocracy on the suitable. As Texas politician and humorist Jim Hightower famously declares in an undated quote, "The middle of the road is for yellow traces and lifeless armadillos." The "F-Bomb" (additionally Cursing; Obscenity; Profanity). An adolescent fallacy of pathos, trying to defend or strengthen one's argument with gratuitous, unrelated sexual, obscene, vulgar, crude or profane language when such language does nothing to make an argument stronger, apart from perhaps to create a way of identification with certain younger male "city" audiences. This fallacy additionally contains adding gratuitous sex scenes or "adult" language to an otherwise unrelated novel or movie, sometimes simply to avoid the dreaded "G" score. Related to this fallacy is the Salacious Fallacy, falsely attracting consideration to and thus potential agreement with one's argument by inappropriately sexualizing it, particularly connecting it to some type of intercourse that's perceived as deviant, perverted or prohibited (E.g., Arguing in opposition to Bill Clinton's presidential legacy by persevering with to wave Monica's Blue Dress, or in opposition to Donald Trump's presidency by obsessively highlighting his past boasting about genital groping). Historically, this dangerous fallacy was deeply implicated with the crime of lynching, through which false, racist accusations towards a Black or minority victim were virtually at all times salacious in nature and the sensation involved was efficiently used to whip up public emotion to a murderous pitch. See also, Red Herring. The False Analogy: The fallacy of incorrectly comparing one thing to another so as to attract a false conclusion. E.g., "Similar to an alley cat must prowl, a traditional adult can’t be tied down to 1 single lover." The alternative of this fallacy is the Sui Generis Fallacy (also, Differance), a postmodern stance that rejects the validity of analogy and of inductive reasoning altogether as a result of any given particular person, place, factor or idea underneath consideration is "sui generis" i.e., different and distinctive, in a class unto itself. Finish the Job: The harmful contemporary fallacy, often geared toward a lesser-educated or working class viewers, that an action or standpoint (or the continuation of that action or standpoint) may not be questioned or discussed because there is "a job to be achieved" or finished, falsely assuming "jobs" are meaningless however by no means to be questioned. Sometimes these involved internalize ("buy into") the "job" and make the task a part of their very own ethos. (E.g., "Ours is to not reason why / Ours is but to do or die.") Related to that is the "Just a Job" fallacy. (E.g., "How can torturers stand to take a look at themselves in the mirror? But I suppose it is Ok as a result of for them it is only a job like some other, the job that they get paid to do.") See additionally "Blind Loyalty," "The Soldiers' Honor Fallacy" and the "Argument from Inertia."<br> The Free Speech Fallacy: The infantile fallacy of responding to challenges to at least one's statements and standpoints by whining, "It is a free nation, isn't it? I can say anything I wish to!" A contemporary case of this fallacy is the "Safe Space," or "Safe Place," where it's not allowed to refute, problem or even talk about another's beliefs because that is likely to be too uncomfortable or "triggery" for emotionally fragile people. E.g., "All I advised him was, 'Jesus loves the little youngsters,' however then he turned around and requested me 'But what about birth defects?' That's mean. I feel I'll cry!" Prof. Bill Hart Davidson (2017) notes that "Ironically, the most strident requires 'security' come from those that want us to problem protections for discredited concepts. Things that science doesn't help AND which have destroyed lives - issues like the inherent superiority of 1 race over another. Those ideas wither below calls for for evidence. They *are* unwelcome. But let's be clear: they're unwelcome because they have not survived the problem of scrutiny." Ironically, in contemporary America "free speech" has usually change into shorthand for freedom of racist, offensive or even neo-Nazi expression, ideological tendencies that when in energy sometimes quash free speech. Additionally, a recent (2017) scientific study has discovered that, in truth, "folks assume harder and produce better political arguments when their views are challenged" and not artificially protected without problem. The elemental Attribution Error (also, Self Justification): A corrupt argument from ethos, this fallacy happens on account of observing and comparing conduct. "You assume that the bad behavior of others is caused by character flaws and foul dispositions whereas your habits is defined by the surroundings. So, for example, I rise up in the morning at 10 a.m. I say it is as a result of my neighbors get together till 2 within the morning (scenario) but I say that the explanation why you do it is that you're lazy. Interestingly, it's extra frequent in individualistic societies the place we value self volition. Collectivist societies are likely to look on the atmosphere extra. (It happens there, too, but it surely is way less widespread.)" [Due to scholar Joel Sax for this!] The obverse of this fallacy is Self Deprecation (additionally Self Debasement), the place, out of both a false humility or a genuine lack of self-esteem, one deliberately places oneself down, most often in hopes of attracting denials, gratifying compliments and reward.</p><p>Gaslighting: A recently-outstanding, vicious fallacy of logic, denying or invalidating a person's personal data and experiences by intentionally twisting or distorting known facts, reminiscences, scenes, events and evidence in an effort to disorient a vulnerable opponent and to make him or her doubt his/her sanity. E.g., "Who're you going to imagine? Me, or your own eyes?" Or, "You declare you discovered me in mattress along with her? Think once more! You're crazy! You critically have to see a shrink." A quite common, though merciless instance of Gaslighting that seems to have been particularly familiar amongst mid-20th century generations is the fallacy of Emotional Invalidation, questioning, after the very fact, the fact or "validity" of affective states, both one other's or one's personal. E.g., "Sure, I made it occur from starting to end, however nevertheless it wasn't me doing it, it was simply my silly hormones betraying me." Or, "You did not really imply it when you said you 'hate' Mommy. Now take a time-out and you'll feel higher." Or, "No, you're not really in love; it's simply infatuation or 'puppy love.'" The fallacy of "Gaslighting" is named after British playwright Patrick Hamilton's 1938 stage play "Gas Light," also called "Angel Street." See also, Blind Loyalty, "The large Brain/Little Brain Fallacy," The Affective Fallacy, and "Alternative Truth." Guilt by Association: The fallacy of attempting to refute or condemn someone's standpoint, arguments or actions by evoking the detrimental ethos of those with whom the speaker is recognized or of a group, party, religion or race to which he or she belongs or was as soon as related to. A type of Ad Hominem Argument, e.g., "Don't hearken to her. She's a Republican so you can't belief something she says," or "Are you or have you ever been a member of the Communist Party?" An extreme instance of that is the Machiavellian "For my enemies, nothing" Fallacy, where actual or perceived "enemies" are by definition always flawed and must be conceded nothing, not even the time of day, e.g., "He's a Republican, so even when he stated the sky is blue I wouldn't believe him." The Half Truth (additionally Card Stacking, Stacking the Deck, Incomplete Information): A corrupt argument from logos, the fallacy of consciously selecting, collecting and sharing only that proof that supports one's personal standpoint, telling the strict reality however deliberately minimizing or omitting important key details with a view to falsify the bigger image and help a false conclusion.(E.g. "The reality is that Bangladesh is one of the world's quickest-rising international locations and might boast of a younger, ambitious and laborious-working inhabitants, a household-positive tradition, a delightful, warm climate of tropical beaches and swaying palms where it never snows, low price medical and dental care, a vibrant faith tradition and a large number of locations of worship, an exquisite, world-class spicy native curry delicacies and a swinging entertainment scene. Taken together, all these solid details clearly prove that Bangladesh is one of the world’s most fascinating locations for young households to live, work and raise a household.") See additionally, Confirmation Bias. Hero-Busting (also, "The proper is the Enemy of the good"): A postmodern fallacy of ethos underneath which, since nothing and nobody in this world is ideal there are usually not and have by no means been any heroes: Washington and Jefferson held slaves, Lincoln was (by our contemporary standards) a racist, Karl Marx sexually exploited his household's personal young dwell-in home worker and got her pregnant, Martin Luther King Jr. had an eye fixed for women too, Lenin condemned feminism, the Mahatma drank his own urine (ugh!), Pope Francis is improper on abortion, capitalism, same-sex marriage and ladies's ordination, Mother Teresa beloved suffering and was improper on nearly the whole lot else too, and so forth., and many others Also applies to the now close to-universal political tactic of ransacking everything an opponent has said, written or achieved since infancy in order to seek out something to misinterpret or condemn (and we all have something!). An early example of this latter tactic is deftly described in Robert Penn Warren's basic (1946) novel, All of the King's Men. This is the alternative of the "Heroes All" fallacy, beneath. The "Hero Busting" fallacy has also been selectively employed on the service of the Identity Fallacy (see under) to falsely "show" that "you can't trust anybody" but a member of "our" id-group since everybody else, even the so-known as "heroes" or "allies" of other groups, are all racist, sexist, anti-Semitic, or hate "us." E.g., In 1862 Abraham Lincoln mentioned he was keen to settle the U.S. Civil War either with or with out freeing the slaves if it would preserve the Union, thus "conclusively proving" that all whites are viciously racist at coronary heart and that African Americans should do for self and never trust any of "them," not even those who declare to be allies. Heroes All (additionally, "Everybody's a Winner"): The contemporary fallacy that everyone seems to be above common or extraordinary. A corrupted argument from pathos (not wanting anyone to lose or to feel unhealthy). Thus, every member of the Armed Services, past or current, who serves honorably is a nationwide hero, each scholar who competes within the Science Fair wins a ribbon or trophy, and every racer is awarded a winner's yellow jersey. This corruption of the argument from pathos, a lot ridiculed by disgraced American humorist Garrison Keeler, ignores the fact that if all people wins nobody wins, and if everyone's a hero nobody's a hero. The logical result of this fallacy is that, as kids's writer Alice Childress writes (1973), "A hero ain't nothing but a sandwich." See additionally the "Soldiers' Honor Fallacy." Hoyle's Fallacy: A fallacy of logos, falsely assuming that a doable occasion of low (even vanishingly low) probability can by no means have occurred and/or would never happen in real life. E.g., "The chance of something as advanced as human DNA emerging by purely random evolution within the time the earth has existed is so negligible that it is for all sensible functions impossible and will need to have required divine intervention." Or, "The chance of a informal, Saturday-night poker player being dealt four aces off an honest, shuffled deck is so infinitesimal that it might never happen even as soon as in a traditional lifetime! That proves you cheated!" See also, Argument from Incredulity. An obverse of Hoyle's Fallacy is "You Can't Win if You do not Play," (additionally, "Someone's gonna win and it'd as nicely be YOU!") a standard and cruel contemporary fallacy used to persuade weak audiences, significantly the poor, the mathematically illiterate and playing addicts to throw their money away on lotteries, horse races, casinos and different long-shot playing schemes. I Wish I Had a Magic Wand: The fallacy of regretfully (and falsely) proclaiming oneself powerless to change a foul or objectionable situation over which one has energy. E.g., "What can we do about gasoline costs? As Secretary of Energy I want I had a magic wand, however I don't" [shrug] . Or, "No, you can't stop piano lessons. I wish I had a magic wand and will teach you piano overnight, however I don't, so prefer it or not, it's important to keep on working towards." The father or mother, after all, ignores the possibility that the youngster could not want or have to study piano. See also, TINA. The Identity Fallacy (additionally Identity Politics; "Die away, ye previous forms and logic!"): A corrupt postmodern argument from ethos, a variant on the Argumentum advert Hominem wherein the validity of one's logic, evidence, experience or arguments relies upon not on their very own energy but fairly on whether the one arguing is a member of a given social class, technology, nationality, religious or ethnic group, color, gender or sexual orientation, profession, occupation or subgroup. On this fallacy, legitimate opposing evidence and arguments are brushed aside or "othered" without comment or consideration, as merely not price arguing about solely because of the lack of proper background or ethos of the particular person making the argument, or as a result of the one arguing does not self-establish as a member of the "in-group." E.g., "You'd understand me right away if you had been Burmese but since you are not there isn't any method I can clarify it to you," or "Nobody but one other nurse can know what a nurse has to go through." Identity fallacies are strengthened by common ritual, language, and discourse. However, these fallacies are sometimes self-involved, pushed by the egotistical ambitions of academics, politicians and would-be group leaders anxious to build their own careers by carving out a particular id group constituency to the exclusion of existing broader-based mostly identities and leadership. An Identity Fallacy may result in scorn or rejection of doubtlessly helpful allies, actual or potential, as a result of they don't seem to be of one's own id. The Identity Fallacy promotes an exclusivist, typically cultish "do for self" philosophy which in at present's world just about guarantees self-marginalization and final defeat. A latest application of the Identity Fallacy is the fallacious accusation of "Cultural Appropriation," in which those that are not of the appropriate Identity are condemned for "appropriating" the delicacies, clothes, language or music of a marginalized group, forgetting the previous axiom that "Imitation is the sincerest type of flattery." Accusations of Cultural Appropriation fairly often stem from competing egocentric financial interests (E.g., "What right do these p*nche Gringos need to set up a taco place right here on Guadalupe Drive to remove enterprise from Doña Teresa's Taquería? They even dare to play Mexican music of their dining room! That's cultural appropriation!"). See also, Othering. Infotainment (also Infortainment; Fake News; InfoWars); A very corrupt and dangerous fashionable media-pushed fallacy that intentionally and knowingly stirs in information, news, falsities and outright lies with entertainment, a mixture often concocted for particular, base ideological and revenue-making motives. Origins of this fallacy predate the present era within the type of "Yellow" or "Tabloid" Journalism. This deadly fallacy has brought on countless social unrest, discontent and even capturing wars (e.g., the Spanish American War) over the course of modern historical past. Practitioners of this fallacy sometimes hypocritically justify its use on the basis that their readers/listeners/viewers "know beforehand" (or ought to know) that the content material provided isn't meant as actual news and is offered for entertainment purposes only, but the truth is this caveat isn't noticed by uncritical audiences who eagerly swallow what the purveyors put forth. See additionally Dog-Whistle Politics. The Job's Comforter Fallacy (also, "Karma is a bi**h;" "What goes round comes around."): The fallacy that since there is no such thing as a such factor as random chance and we (I, my group, or my country) are underneath particular protection of heaven, any misfortune or natural catastrophe that we suffer have to be a punishment for our personal or someone else's secret sin or open wickedness. The opposite of the Appeal to Heaven, this is the fallacy employed by the Westboro Baptist Church members who protest fallen service members' funerals all across the United States. See also, Magical Thinking. Just Do it. (additionally, "Find a approach;" "I don't care the way you do it;" "Accomplish the mission;" "By Any Means Necessary." ): A pure, abusive Argumentum ad Baculum (argument from power), through which somebody in energy arbitrarily waves apart or overrules the moral objections of subordinates or followers and orders them to accomplish a goal by any means required, truthful or foul The clear implication is that unethical or immoral strategies must be used. E.g., "You say there is not any approach you may finish the dig on schedule since you discovered an outdated pioneer gravesite with a fancy tombstone on the excavation site? Well, find a means! Make it disappear! Just do it! I do not need to know the way you do it, simply do it! This is one million greenback contract and we'd like it done by Tuesday." See additionally, Plausible Deniability. Just Plain Folks (also, "Values"): This corrupt modern argument from ethos argues to a much less-educated or rural audience that the one arguing is "just plain of us" who is a "plain talker," "says what s/he is considering," "scorns political correctness," somebody who "you do not need a dictionary to grasp" and who thinks just like the audience and is thus worthy of belief, in contrast to some member of the fancy-speaking, latte-sipping Left Coast Political Elite, some "double-domed professor," "inside-the-beltway Washington bureaucrat," "tree-hugger" or other despised outsider who "would not think like we do" or "does not share our values." It is a counterpart to the Ad Hominem Fallacy and most often carries a distinct reek of xenophobia or racism as properly. See additionally the Plain Truth Fallacy and the Simpleton's Fallacy. The Law of Unintended Consequences (also, "Every Revolution Finally ends up Eating its own Young:" Grit; Resilience Doctrine): In this very harmful, archly pessimistic postmodern fallacy the bogus "Law of Unintended Consequences," as soon as a semi-humorous satirical corollary of "Murphy's Law," is elevated to to the standing of an iron legislation of history. This fallacy arbitrarily proclaims a priori that since we are able to never know every little thing or securely foresee anything, sooner or later in as we speak's "complex world" unforeseeable opposed consequences and damaging unintended effects (so-referred to as "unknown unknowns") will at all times find yourself blindsiding and overwhelming, defeating and vitiating any and all naive "do-gooder" efforts to improve our world. Instead, one must always anticipate defeat and be ready to roll with the punches by creating "grit" or "resilience" as a main survival ability. This nihilist fallacy is a sensible negation of the the potential of any legitimate argument from logos. See additionally, TINA. Lying with Statistics: The contemporary fallacy of misusing true figures and numbers to "prove" unrelated claims. (e.g. "In real terms, attending school has never been cheaper than it is now. When expressed as a percentage of the nationwide debt, the cost of getting a faculty schooling is definitely far less at present than it was back in 1965!"). A corrupted argument from logos, often preying on the general public's perceived or precise mathematical ignorance. This includes the Tiny Percentage Fallacy, that an amount or motion that is quite vital in and of itself somehow becomes insignificant just because it is a tiny percentage of something much bigger. E.g., the arbitrary arrest, detention or interception of "solely" a few hundred legally-boarded international travelers as a tiny percentage of the tens of thousands who usually arrive. Under this similar fallacy a shopper who would choke on spending an extra dollar for 2 cans of peas will usually ignore $50 additional on the price of a car or $a thousand further on the value of a house simply because these variations are "only" a tiny share of the a lot larger amount being spent. Historically, sales taxes or worth-added taxes (VAT) have successfully gained public acceptance and remain "below the radar" due to this latter fallacy, despite the fact that amounting to a whole lot or hundreds of dollars a 12 months in additional tax burden. See additionally Half-truth, the Snow Job, and the Red Herring. Magical Thinking (also, the Sin of Presumption; Expect a Miracle!): An ancient however deluded fallacy of logos, arguing that in relation to "crunch time," offered one has sufficient faith, prays exhausting enough, says the best words, does the correct rituals, "names it and claims it," or "claims the Promise," God will at all times suspend the laws of the universe and work a miracle on the request of or for the benefit of the True Believer. In observe this nihilist fallacy denies the existence of a rational or predictable universe and thus the potential for any legitimate argument from logic. See also, Positive Thinking, the Appeal to Heaven, and the Job's Comforter fallacy. Mala Fides (Arguing in Bad Faith; also Sophism): Using an argument that the arguer himself or herself knows shouldn't be valid. E.g., An unbeliever attacking believers by throwing verses from their own Holy Scriptures at them, or a lawyer arguing for the innocence of somebody whom s/he knows full nicely to be responsible. This latter is a standard observe in American jurisprudence, and is typically portrayed as the worst face of "Sophism." [Special because of Bradley Steffens for pointing out this fallacy!] Included underneath this fallacy is the fallacy of Motivational Truth (additionally, Demagogy, or Campaign Promises), intentionally lying to "the people" to gain their support or inspire them toward some action the rhetor perceives to be desirable (utilizing evil discursive means toward a "good" material end). A particularly bizarre and corrupt type of this latter fallacy is Self Deception (also, Whistling by the Graveyard). during which one intentionally and knowingly deludes oneself so as to realize a objective, or maybe merely to suppress anxiety and maintain one's energy level, enthusiasm, morale, peace of mind or sanity in moments of adversity. Measurability: A corrupt argument from logos and ethos (that of science and arithmetic), the fashionable Fallacy of Measurability proposes that if one thing can't be measured, quantified and replicated it does not exist, or is "nothing but anecdotal, touchy-feely stuff" unworthy of critical consideration, i.e., mere gossip or subjective opinion. Often, reaching "Measurability" essentially calls for preselecting, "fiddling" or "massaging" the accessible knowledge merely with the intention to make it statistically tractable, or as a way to help a desired conclusion. Scholar Thomas Persing thus describes "The modernist fallacy of falsely and inappropriately making use of norms, standardizations, and knowledge level requirements to quantify productiveness or success. This is much like advanced question, measurability, and oversimplification fallacies where the person makes an attempt to categorize complicated / numerous subjects into terms that when measured, go well with their position. For instance, the calculation of inflation within the United States would not embrace the modifications in the worth to gasoline, because the worth of gasoline is simply too volatile, despite the actual fact gasoline is important for most people to stay their lives in the United States." See also, "A Priori Argument," "Lying with Statistics," and the "Procrustean Fallacy." Mind-reading (Also, "The Fallacy of Speculation;" "I can read you want a e book"): An historical fallacy, a corruption of stasis idea, speculating about someone else's ideas, emotions, motivations and "body language" and then claiming to grasp these clearly, generally extra accurately than the individual in question is aware of themselves. The rhetor deploys this phony "information" as a fallacious warrant for or against a given standpoint. Scholar Myron Peto gives as an example the baseless declare that "Obama doesn’t a da** [sic] for human rights." Assertions that "name for speculation" are rightly rejected as fallacious in U.S. judicial proceedings but far too typically pass uncontested in public discourse. The opposite of this fallacy is the postmodern fallacy of Mind Blindness (additionally, the Autist's Fallacy), a whole denial of any regular human capacity for "Theory of Mind," postulating the utter incommensurability and privateness of minds and thus the impossibility of ever realizing or actually understanding one other's ideas, emotions, motivations or intents. This fallacy, much promoted by the late postmodernist guru Jacques Derrida, necessarily vitiates any type of Stasis Theory. However, the Fallacy of Mind Blindness has been decisively refuted in several research, together with current (2017) research revealed by the Association for Psychological Science, and a (2017) Derxel University study indicating how "our minds align when we communicate." Moral Licensing: The contemporary moral fallacy that one's constantly moral life, good behavior or latest extreme suffering or sacrifice earns him/her the suitable to commit an immoral act with out repercussions, consequences or punishment. E.g., "I have been good all year, so one unhealthy won't matter," or "After what I've been by way of, God is aware of I need this." The fallacy of Moral Licensing can be typically utilized to nations, e.g., "Those that criticize repression and the Gulag in the former USSR neglect what extraordinary suffering the Russians went by means of in World War II and the thousands and thousands upon millions who died." See additionally Argument from Motives. The opposite of this fallacy is the (excessively rare in our times) moral fallacy of Scruples, during which one obsesses to pathological excess about one's unintentional, forgotten, unconfessed or unforgiven sins and because of them, the seemingly inevitable prospect of eternal damnation. Moral Superiority (additionally, Self Righteousness; the Moral High Ground): An historic, immoral and very dangerous fallacy, enunciated in Thomistic / Scholastic philosophy in the late Middle Ages, arguing that Evil has no rights that the good and the Righteous are bound to respect. That approach lies torture, heretic-burning, and the Spanish Inquisition. Those who observe this vicious fallacy reject any "ethical equivalency" (i.e., even-handed treatment) between themselves (the Righteous) and their enemies (the Wicked), against whom anything is fair, and to whom nothing must be conceded, not even the fitting to life. This fallacy is a selected denial of the historical "Golden Rule," and has been the cause of countless intractable battle, since if one is Righteous no negotiation with Evil and its minions is feasible; The one imaginable road to a "just" peace is through whole victory, i.e., absolutely the defeat and liquidation of one's Wicked enemies. American folks singer and Nobel Laureate Bob Dylan expertly demolishes this fallacy in his 1963 protest song, "With God on Our Side." See additionally the Appeal to Heaven, and Moving the Goalposts. Mortification (also, Live as though You're Dying; Pleasure-hating; No Pain No Gain): An ancient fallacy of logos, trying to "beat the flesh into submission" by excessive exercise or ascetic practices, deliberate starvation or infliction of ache, denying the undeniable proven fact that discomfort and ache exist for the aim of warning of lasting injury to the physique. Extreme examples of this fallacy are varied types of self-flagellation resembling practiced by the brand new Mexico "Penitentes" throughout Holy Week or by Shia devotees during Muharram. More familiar contemporary manifestations of this fallacy are excessive "insanity" exercise regimes not meant for normal well being, health or competitive purposes but just to "toughen" or "punish" the physique. Certain pop-nutritional theories and diets appear based mostly on this fallacy as well. Some contemporary specialists recommend that self-mortification (an English word related to the Latinate French root "mort," or "loss of life.") is in actual fact "suicide on the installment plan." Others suggest that it entails a narcotic-like addiction to the physique's pure endorphins. The other of this fallacy is the ancient fallacy of Hedonism, in search of and valuing bodily pleasure as a good in itself, simply for its personal sake. Moving the Goalposts (additionally, Changing the principles; All's Fair in Love and War; The Nuclear Option; "Winning is not every little thing, it is the only factor"): A fallacy of logos, demanding sure proof or evidence, a certain degree of help or a certain number of votes to resolve an issue, and then when this is obtainable, demanding much more, different or better assist as a way to deny victory to an opponent. For individuals who practice the fallacy of Moral Superiority (above), Moving the Goalposts is commonly perceived as completely good and permissible if mandatory to prevent the victory of Wickedness and ensure the triumph of one's personal side, i.e, the Righteous. MYOB (Mind Your individual Business; also You are not the Boss of Me; "None of yer beeswax," "So What?", The Appeal to Privacy): The contemporary fallacy of arbitrarily prohibiting or terminating any dialogue of 1's own standpoints or behavior, regardless of how absurd, harmful, evil or offensive, by drawing a phony curtain of privateness round oneself and one's actions. A corrupt argument from ethos (one's own). E.g., "Sure, I used to be doing eighty and weaving between lanes on Mesa Street--what's it to you? You're not a cop, you are not my nanny. It's my business if I need to hurry, and your enterprise to get the hell out of my approach. Mind your personal damn business!" Or, "Yeah, I killed my baby. So what? Butt out! It wasn't your brat, so it's none of your damn enterprise!" Rational dialogue is lower off because "it is none of your corporation!" See additionally, "Taboo." The counterpart of this is "Nobody Will Ever Know," (additionally "What happens in Vegas stays in Vegas;" "I think We're Alone Now," or the center of Darkness Syndrome) the fallacy that simply because no person necessary is wanting (or because one is on vacation, or away in school, or overseas) one could freely commit immoral, selfish, unfavourable or evil acts at will without expecting any of the normal consequences or punishment . Author Joseph Conrad graphically describes this kind of ethical degradation in the character of Kurtz in his basic novel, Heart of Darkness. Name-Calling: Quite a lot of the "Ad Hominem" argument. The dangerous fallacy that, merely because of who one is or is alleged to be, any and all arguments, disagreements or objections towards one's standpoint or actions are robotically racist, sexist, anti-Semitic, bigoted, discriminatory or hateful. E.g., "My stand on abortion is the one correct one. To disagree with me, argue with me or query my judgment in any approach would only present what a pig you actually are." Also applies to refuting an argument by simply calling it a "fallacy," or declaring it invalid with out proving why it's invalid, or summarily dismissing arguments or opponents by labeling them "racist," "communist," "fascist," "moron," any identify adopted by the suffix "tard" (quick for the highly offensive "retard") or some other unfavourable identify without additional rationalization. E.g., "He's an a**gap, finish of story" or "I'm a loser." A subset of that is the Newspeak fallacy, creating identification with a certain form of audience by inventing or using racist or offensive, typically army-sounding nicknames for opponents or enemies, e.g., "The damned DINO's are even worse than the Repugs and the Neocons." Or, "In the large One it took us solely five years to beat each the J*ps and the Jerries, so more than a decade and a half after niner-eleven why is it so hard for us to beat a raggedy bunch of Hajjis and Towel-heads?" Note that originally the word "Nazi" belonged on this category, but this term has lengthy come into use as a correct English noun. See additionally, "Reductionism," "Ad Hominem Argument," and "Alphabet Soup." The Narrative Fallacy (also, the Fable; the Poster Child) The historic fallacy of persuasion by telling a "heartwarming" or horrifying story or fable, notably to less-educated or uncritical audiences who're less seemingly to grasp purely logical arguments or general rules. E.g., Charles Dickens' "A Christmas Carol." Narratives and fables, particularly people who identify names and personalize arguments, tend to be much more persuasive at a preferred level than other types of argument and are virtually irrefutable, even when the story in question is well known to be completely fictional. This fallacy is discovered even in the sphere of science, as famous by a current (2017) scientific study. The NIMBY Fallacy (Not in My Back Yard; additionally "Build a Wall!"; "Lock'em up and throw away the key;" The Ostrich Strategy; The Gitmo Solution.). The infantile fallacy that a problem, challenge or menace that is not bodily close by or to which I'm circuitously uncovered has for all practical purposes "gone away" and ceased to exist. Thus, a problem may be completely and definitively solved by "making it go away," preferably to someplace "out of sight," a walled-off ghetto or a distant isle where there is no news coverage, and the place no one essential stays. Lacking that, it can be made to go away by simply eliminating, censoring or ignoring "detrimental" media coverage and public discussion of the issue and focusing on "optimistic, encouraging" things as an alternative. No Discussion (additionally No Negotiation; the Control Voice; Peace by way of Strength; a Muscular Foreign Policy; Fascism): A pure Argumentum advert Baculum that rejects reasoned dialogue, offering both immediate, unconditional compliance/surrender or defeat/loss of life as the one two options for settling even minor variations, e.g., screaming "Get down on the ground, now!" or declaring "We don't talk to terrorists." This deadly fallacy falsely paints real or potential "hostiles" as monsters devoid of all motive, and far too often incorporates a very robust factor of "machismo" as well. I.e. "An actual, muscular chief by no means resorts to pantywaist pleading, apologies, excuses, fancy discuss or argument. That's for legal professionals, liars and pansies and is nothing however a delaying tactic. An actual man stands tall, says what he thinks, draws fast and shoots to kill." The late actor John Wayne frequently portrayed this fallacy in his movie roles. See additionally, The Pout. Non-recognition: A deluded fallacy in which one intentionally chooses to not publicly "acknowledge" floor fact, normally on the theory that this could by some means reward evil-doers if we recognize their deeds as real or consequential. Often the underlying concept is that the state of affairs is "short-term" and can quickly be reversed. E.g., Within the decades from 1949 until Richard Nixon's presidency the United States formally refused to recognize the existence of essentially the most populous nation on earth, the People's Republic of China, because America supported the U.S.-pleasant Republic of China government on Taiwan as an alternative and hoped they may someway return to power on the mainland. Perversely, in 2016 the U.S. President-Elect brought on a significant worldwide flap by chatting with the President of the federal government on Taiwan, a de facto violation of lengthy-standing American non-recognition of that very same regime. More than half a century after the Korean War the U.S. nonetheless refuses to pronounce the name of, or recognize (a lot much less conduct regular, peaceful negotiations with) a nuclear-armed DPRK (North Korea). A person who practices this fallacy risks institutionalization (e.g., "I refuse to acknowledge Mom's murder, 'cuz that'd give the victory to the murderer! I refuse to look at you bury her! Stop! Stop!") but tragically, such behavior is only too common in international relations. See additionally the State Actor Fallacy, Political Correctness, and The Pout. The Non Sequitur: The deluded fallacy of offering evidence, causes or conclusions that have no logical connection to the argument at hand (e.g. "The reason I flunked your course is because the U. S. authorities is now putting out purple 5-greenback payments! Purple!"). (See additionally Red Herring.) Nothing New Under the Sun (also, Uniformitarianism, "Seen all of it earlier than;" "Surprise, surprise;" "Plus ça change, plus c'est la même selected."): Fairly rare in contemporary discourse, this deeply cynical fallacy, a corruption of the argument from logos, falsely proposes that there just isn't and will never be any real novelty in this world. Any argument that there are really "new" ideas or phenomena is judged a priori to be unworthy of severe discussion and dismissed with a jaded sigh and a wave of the hand as "the usual same old." E.g., "[Sigh!] Idiots! Don't you see that the current influx of refugees from the Mideast is just the standard Muslim invasion of Christendom that’s been happening for 1,four hundred years?" Or, "Libertarianism is nothing but re-warmed anarchism, which, in flip, is nothing however the historic Antinomian Heresy. Like I informed you earlier than, there's nothing new underneath the sun!"</p><p>Olfactory Rhetoric (additionally, "The Nose Knows"): A vicious, zoological-stage fallacy of pathos through which opponents are marginalized, dehumanized or hated primarily based on their supposed odor, lack of private cleanliness, imagined diseases or filth. E. g., "Those demonstrators are demanding something or another but I'll solely discuss to them if first they go home and take a bath!" Or, "I can odor a Jew a block away!" Also applies to demeaning different cultures or nationalities based mostly on their differing cuisines, e.g., "I don't care what they say or do, their breath always stinks of garlic. And have you ever ever smelled their kitchens?" Olfactory Rhetoric straddles the borderline between a fallacy and a psychopathology. A 2017 study by Ruhr University Bochum suggests that olfactory rhetoric does not arise from a simple, computerized physiological response to an actual odor, but in reality, strongly depends on one's predetermined reaction or prejudices toward another, and one's olfactory center "is activated even before we perceive an odour." See additionally, Othering.</p><p>Oops! (also, "Oh, I forgot...," "The Judicial Surprise," "The October Surprise,"): A corrupt argument from logos by which towards the decisive finish of a dialogue, debate, trial, electoral campaign period, or resolution-making course of an opponent immediately, elaborately and usually sarcastically shams having simply remembered or uncovered some salient truth, argument or evidence. E.g., "Oops, I forgot to ask you: You had been convicted of this similar offense twice earlier than, weren't you?!" Banned in American judicial argument, this fallacy is just too widespread in public discourse. Also applies to supposedly "discovering" and sensationally reporting some doubtlessly damning data or proof after which, after the injury has been accomplished or the decision has been made, quietly declaring, "Oops, I suppose that actually wasn't that significant after all. Ignore what I said. Sorry 'bout that!"</p><p>Othering (also Otherizing, "They're not Like Us," Stereotyping, Xenophobia, Racism, Prejudice): A badly corrupted, discriminatory argument from ethos where facts, arguments, experiences or objections are arbitrarily disregarded, ignored or put down without severe consideration because these concerned "will not be like us," or "don't assume like us." E.g., "It's Ok for Mexicans to earn a buck an hour within the maquiladoras [Mexico-primarily based "Twin Plants" run by American or different overseas companies]. If it occurred here I'd call it brutal exploitation and daylight robbery but south of the border, down Mexico approach the economy is different and they don't seem to be like us." Or, "You declare that life must be actually horrible over there for terrorists to ever consider blowing themselves up with suicide vests just to make a degree, but always remember that they're totally different from us. They do not think about life and dying the identical method we do." A vicious number of the Ad Hominem Fallacy, most often applied to non-white or non-Christian populations. A variation on this fallacy is the "Speakee" Fallacy ("You speakee da English?"; also the Shibboleth), through which an opponent's arguments are mocked, ridiculed and dismissed solely due to the speaker's alleged or real accent, dialect, or lack of fluency in customary English, e.g., "He advised me 'Vee vorkers need to type a younion!' however I told him I'm not a 'vorker,' and to come back back when he learns to talk proper English." A really harmful, excessive instance of Othering is Dehumanization, a fallacy of faulty analogy the place opponents are dismissed as mere cockroaches, lice, apes, monkeys, rats, weasels or bloodsucking parasites who don't have any proper to talk or to stay at all, and doubtless must be "squashed like bugs." This fallacy is in the end the "logic" behind ethnic cleansing, genocide and fuel ovens. See also the Identity Fallacy, "Name Calling" and "Olfactory Rhetoric." The alternative of this fallacy is the "Pollyanna Principle" beneath.</p><p>Overexplanation: A fallacy of logos stemming from the actual paradox that past a sure level, more clarification, instructions, knowledge, dialogue, proof or proof inevitably results in much less, not more, understanding. Contemporary urban mythology holds that this fallacy is usually male ("Mansplaining"), whereas barely half a century ago the prevailing myth was that it was men who have been naturally monosyllabic, grunting or non-verbal whereas ladies would sometimes overexplain (e.g., the 1960 hit song by Joe Jones, "You Talk Too much"). "Mansplaining" is, in accordance with scholar Danelle Pecht, "the infuriating tendency of many males to all the time need to be the smartest person within the room, regardless of the subject of dialogue and the way a lot they actually know!" See additionally The Snow Job, and the "Plain Truth" fallacy.</p><p>Overgeneralization (additionally Hasty Generalization; Totus pro Partes Fallacy; the Merological Fallacy): A fallacy of logos the place a broad generalization that's agreed to be true is offered as overriding all particular circumstances, particularly special instances requiring quick attention. E.g., "Doctor, you say that this time of 12 months a flu vaccination is essential. but I might counter that all vaccinations are important" (implying that I'm not going to present particular consideration to getting the flu shot). Or, trying to refute "Black Lives Matter" by replying, "All Lives Matter," the latter undeniably true but nonetheless a fallacious overgeneralization in that particular and urgent context. " Overgeneralization may also mean one sees a single unfavourable final result as an eternal sample of defeat. Overgeneralization might also embrace the the Pars professional Toto Fallacy, the stupid however frequent fallacy of incorrectly making use of one or two true examples to all cases. E.g., a minority one who commits a very horrifying crime, and whose example is then used to smear the repute of the whole group, or when a authorities publishes particular lists of crimes committed by teams who're imagined to be hated, e.g., Jews, or undocumented immigrants. Famously, the case of 1 Willie Horton was efficiently used on this manner within the 1988 American presidential election to smear African Americans, Liberals, and by extension, Democratic presidential candidate Michael Dukakis. See additionally the fallacy of "Zero Tolerance" under. The Paralysis of Analysis (additionally, Procrastination; the Nirvana Fallacy): A postmodern fallacy that since all knowledge isn't in, any conclusion is at all times provisional, no reputable decision can ever be made and any action should all the time be delayed until forced by circumstances. A corruption of the argument from logos. (See also the "Law of Unintended Consequences.") The Passive Voice Fallacy (also, the Bureaucratic Passive): A fallacy from ethos, concealing energetic human agency behind the curtain of the grammatical passive voice, e.g., "It has been decided that you are to be let go," arrogating an ethos of cosmic infallibility and inevitability to a really fallible aware resolution made by identifiable, fallible and doubtlessly culpable human beings. Scholar Jackson Katz notes (2017): "We speak about how many ladies have been raped last yr, not about how many males raped girls. We speak about what number of girls in a school district have been harassed last year, not about how many boys harassed women. We discuss how many teenage ladies in the state of Vermont bought pregnant final year, fairly than how many men and boys impregnated teenage women. ... So you'll be able to see how using the passive voice has a political impact. [It] shifts the main target off of males and boys and onto ladies and ladies. Even the time period 'Violence towards girls' is problematic. It is a passive construction; there's no lively agent in the sentence. It's a foul factor that occurs to girls, however if you look on the time period 'violence against girls' nobody is doing it to them, it simply occurs to them... Men aren't even part of it." See additionally, Political Correctness. An obverse of the Passive Voice Fallacy is the Be-verb Fallacy, a cultish linguistic theory and the bane of many a primary-yr composition pupil's life, alleging that an extraordinary degree of "readability," "sanity," or textual "liveliness" could be reached by strictly eliminating all passive verb types and all types of the verb "to be" from English-language writing. This odd but unproven contention, courting back to Alfred Korzybski's "General Semantics" self-enchancment movement of the 1920's and '30's through S. I. Hayakawa, blithely ignores the fact that though quite a few major world languages lack a ubiquitous "be-verb," e.g., Russian, Hindi and Arabic, audio system of those languages, like English-talking General Semantics devotees themselves, have never been confirmed to enjoy any explicit cognitive benefit over abnormal everyday users of the passive voice and the verb "to be." Nor have writers of the curiously stilted English that results from making use of this fallacy achieved any special success in academia, skilled or technical writing, or in the popular domain. Paternalism: A serious fallacy of ethos, arbitrarily tut-tutting, dismissing or ignoring another's arguments or considerations as "childish" or "immature;" taking a condescending attitude of superiority towards opposing standpoints or towards opponents themselves. E.g., "Your argument against the warfare is so infantile. Try approaching the problem like an grownup for a change," "I do not argue with youngsters," or "Somebody has to be the grownup in the room, and it might as effectively be me. Here's why you're wrong..." Also refers back to the sexist fallacy of dismissing a girl's argument because she is a lady, e.g., "Oh, it have to be that point of the month, eh?" See additionally "Ad Hominem Argument" and "Tone Policing." Personalizaion: A deluded fallacy of ethos, seeing yourself or someone else because the essential trigger of some external occasion for which you or the opposite particular person had no responsibility. E.g., "Never fails! It needed to happen! It's my ordinary rotten luck that the biggest blizzard of the 12 months had to happen just on the day of our winter festival. If it wasn't for ME being concerned I'm certain the blizzard wouldn't have happened!" This fallacy will also be taken in a constructive sense, e.g. Hitler evidently believed that just because he was Hitler each bullet would miss him and no explosive might contact him. "Personalization" straddles the borderline between a fallacy and a psychopathology. See additionally, "The Job's Comforter Fallacy," and "Magical Thinking." The Plain Truth Fallacy; (also, the straightforward Truth fallacy, Salience Bias, the KISS Principle [Keep it Short and Simple / Keep it Simple, Stupid], the Monocausal Fallacy; the Executive Summary): A fallacy of logos favoring acquainted, singular, summarized or easily comprehensible data, examples, explanations and evidence over those that are extra complicated and unfamiliar but much closer to the reality. E.g., "Ooooh, look in any respect those equations and formulation! Just boil it all the way down to the easy Truth," or "I don't want your damned philosophy lesson! Just tell me the Plain Truth about why this is occurring." A more sophisticated model of this fallacy arbitrarily proposes, as did 18th century Scottish rhetorician John Campbell, that the truth is at all times simple by nature and solely malicious enemies of Truth would ever seek to make it complicated. (See additionally, The Snow Job, and Overexplanation.) The alternative of this is the postmodern fallacy of Ineffability or Complexity (additionally, Truthiness; Post-Truth),, arbitrarily declaring that right now's world is so advanced that there is no reality, or that Truth (capital-T), if certainly such a thing exists, is unknowable except maybe by God or the Messiah and is thus perpetually inaccessible and irrelevant to us mere mortals, making any cogent argument from logos inconceivable. See also the big Lie, and Paralysis of Analysis. Plausible Deniability: A vicious fallacy of ethos below which somebody in power forces those beneath his or her management to do some questionable or evil act and to then falsely assume or conceal accountability for that act so as to protect the ethos of the one in command. E.g., "Arrange a fatal accident however be certain that I do know nothing about it!" Playing on Emotion (also, the Sob Story; the Pathetic Fallacy; the "Bleeding Heart" fallacy, the Drama Queen / Drama King Fallacy): The traditional fallacy of pure argument from pathos, ignoring details and evoking emotion alone. E.g., "If you don’t agree that witchcraft is a major downside just shut up, shut your eyes for a moment and picture in your mind all these poor mothers crying bitter tears for their innocent tiny children whose cozy little beds and pleased tricycles lie all cold and abandoned, just because of these wicked outdated witches! Let's string’em all up!" The opposite of that is the Apathetic Fallacy (also, Cynicism; Burnout; Compassion Fatigue), where any and all reputable arguments from pathos are brushed apart as a result of, as noted nation music artist Jo Dee Messina sang (2005), "My give-a-damn's busted." Obverse to Playing on Emotion is the historical fallacy of Refinement ("Real Feelings"), the place sure classes of dwelling beings such as plants and non-domesticated animals, infants, babies and minor kids, barbarians, slaves, deep-sea sailors, farmworkers, criminals and convicts, refugees, addicts, terrorists, Catholics, Jews, foreigners, the poor, individuals of color, "Hillbillies," "Hobos," homeless or undocumented people, or "the decrease courses" in general are deemed incapable of experiencing actual ache like we do, or of having any "real emotions" in any respect, only brutish appetites, vile lusts, evil drives, filthy cravings, biological instincts, psychological reflexes and automatic tropisms. Noted rhetorician Kenneth Burke falls into this final, behaviorist fallacy in his in any other case good (1966) Language as Symbolic Action, in his discussion of a bird trapped in a lecture room. See additionally, Othering.</p><p>Political Correctness ("Pc"): A postmodern fallacy, a counterpart of the "Name Calling" fallacy, supposing that the character of a factor or situation might be changed by simply changing its title. E.g., "Today we strike a blow for animal rights and in opposition to cruelty to animals by changing the identify of ‘pets’ to ‘animal companions.’" Or "Never, ever play the 'victim' card, as a result of it's so manipulative and sounds so damaging, helpless and despairing. Instead of being 'victims,' we are proud to be 'survivors.'" (After all, when "victims" disappear then perpetrators conveniently vanish as well!) See additionally, The Passive Voice Fallacy, and The Scripted Message. Also applies to different types of political "Language Control," e.g., being careful by no means to consult with North Korea or ISIS/ISIL by their fairly pompous proper names ("the Democratic People's Republic of Korea" and "the Islamic State," respectively) or to the Syrian authorities because the "Syrian government," (It's always the "Regime" or the "Dictatorship."). Occasionally the fallacy of "Political Correctness" is falsely confused with easy courtesy, e.g., "I'm sick and tired of the tyranny of Political Correctness, having to observe my words on a regular basis--I need to be free to talk my mind and to name out a N----- or a Queer in public any time I rattling nicely feel like it!" See also, Non-recognition. An opposite of this fallacy is the fallacy of Venting, beneath. The Pollyanna Principle (also, "The Projection Bias," "They're Just like Us," "Singing 'Kumbaya.'"): A conventional, usually tragic fallacy of ethos, that of routinely (and falsely) assuming that everyone else in any given place, time and circumstance had or has principally the identical (optimistic) wishes, needs, pursuits, concerns, ethics and moral code as "we" do. This fallacy virtually if not theoretically denies each the truth of difference and the human capability to chose radical evil. E.g., arguing that "The only factor most Nazi Storm Troopers needed was the same factor we do, to reside in peace and prosperity and to have a superb family life," when the truth was radically otherwise. Dr. William Lorimer presents this clarification: "The Projection Bias is the flip side of the 'They're not Like Us' [Othering] fallacy. The Projection bias (fallacy) is 'They're simply folks like me, due to this fact they have to be motivated by the identical things that encourage me.' For example: 'I'd never pull a gun and shoot a police officer until I used to be convinced he was making an attempt to homicide me; therefore, when Joe Smith shot a police officer, he should have been in genuine fear for his life.' I see the identical fallacy with regard to Israel: 'The people of Gaza simply need to be left in peace; therefore, if Israel would just carry the blockade and allow Hamas to import something they want, with out restriction, they might stop firing rockets at Israel.' That will or will not be true - I personally don't believe it - but the argument clearly presumes that the folks of Gaza, or at least their leaders, are motivated by a need for peaceful co-existence." The Pollyanna Principle was gently but expertly demolished within the traditional twentieth-century American animated cartoon collection, "The Flintstones," during which the humor lay in the absurdity of picturing "Stone Age" characters having the same issues, values and lifestyles as mid-twentieth century white working class Americans. That is the opposite of the Othering fallacy. (Note: The Pollyanna Principle fallacy should not be confused with a psychological precept of the identical name which observes that positive memories are normally retained extra strongly than detrimental ones. ) The Positive Thinking Fallacy: An immensely standard but deluded trendy fallacy of logos, that because we're "pondering positively" that in itself one way or the other biases exterior, objective reality in our favor even earlier than we lift a finger to act. See also, Magical Thinking. Note that this specific fallacy is commonly a part of a much wider closed-minded, considerably cultish ideology the place the practitioner is warned towards taking note of to and even acknowledging the fact of evil, or of "destructive" evidence or counter-arguments towards his/her standpoints. In the latter case rational discussion, argument or refutation is most frequently futile. See also, Deliberate Ignorance. The Post Hoc Argument: (also, "Post Hoc Propter Hoc;" "Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc;" "Too much of a coincidence," the "Clustering Illusion"): The basic paranoiac fallacy of attributing an imaginary causality to random coincidences, concluding that just because one thing occurs near, at the identical time as, or just after one thing else, the very first thing is attributable to the second. E.g., "AIDS first emerged as a epidemic back in the exact same era when Disco music was changing into in style--that's an excessive amount of of a coincidence: It proves that Disco brought about AIDS!" Correlation does not equal causation. The Pout (also The Silent Treatment; Nonviolent Civil Disobedience; Noncooperation): An often-infantile Argumentum ad Baculum that arbitrarily rejects or gives up on dialogue before it's concluded. Probably the most benign nonviolent type of this fallacy is present in passive-aggressive ways similar to slowdowns, boycotts, lockouts, sitdowns and strikes. Under President Barack Obama the United States lastly ended a half-century lengthy political Pout with Cuba. See additionally "No Discussion" and "Nonrecognition." The Procrustean Fallacy (also, "Maintaining Standards," Standardization, Uniformity, Fordism). The modernist fallacy of falsely and inappropriately applying the norms and requirements of standardized manufacturing. quality management and inflexible scheduling, or of navy self-discipline to inherently numerous free human beings, their lives, training, habits, clothing and look. This fallacy typically seems to stem from the pathological need of someone in energy to place in "order" their disturbingly free, messy and disordered universe by proscribing others' freedom and insisting on inflexible standardization, alphabetization, self-discipline, uniformity and "objective" assessment of everybody below their energy. This fallacy partially explains why marching in straight lines, mass calisthenics, goose-stepping, drum-and-bugle or flag corps, standing at consideration, saluting, uniforms, and standardized categorization are so typical of fascism, tyrannical regimes, and of tyrants petty and grand all over the place. Because of creator Eimar O'Duffy for figuring out this fallacy! Prosopology (also, Prosopography, Reciting the Litany; "Tell Me, What Were Their Names?"; Reading the Roll of Martyrs): An historical fallacy of pathos and ethos, publicly studying out loud, singing, or inscribing at length a list of names (most or all of which will likely be unknown to the reader or audience), generally in a unfavourable sense, to underline the gravity of a previous tragedy or mass-casualty event, sometimes in a constructive sense, to emphasize the historical historic continuity of a church, group or trigger. Proper names, especially if they are from the same tradition or language group as the viewers, can have near-mystical persuasive energy. In some circumstances, those who use this fallacy in its contemporary kind will defend it as an try to "personalize" an otherwise anonymous latest mass tragedy. This fallacy was just about unknown in secular American affairs before about 100 years ago, when the customized emerged of listing of the names of local World War I casualties on group monuments across the nation. That that is certainly a fallacy is clear by the fact that the names on these century-old monuments are actually significant solely to genealogists and specialized historians, simply because the names on the Vietnam War Memorial in Washington or the names of those who perished on 9/eleven will surely be in another several generations. The Red Herring (also, Distraction): An irrelevant argument, making an attempt to mislead and distract an audience by bringing up an unrelated but emotionally loaded problem. E.g., "In regard to my a number of bankruptcies and current indictment for corruption let’s be straight up about what’s actually necessary: Terrorism! Just take a look at what happened final week in [title the place]. Vote for me and I'll struggle these terrorists anywhere on the planet!" Also applies to elevating unrelated issues as falsely opposing the issue at hand, e.g., "You say 'Black Lives Matter,' but I'd somewhat say 'Climate Change Matters!'" when the 2 contentions are in no way opposed, only competing for attention. See also Availability Bias, and Dog Whistle Politics. Reductio advert Hitlerum (or, advert Hitleram): A extremely problematic contemporary historical-revisionist contention that the argument "That's just what Hitler mentioned (or would have stated, or would have executed)" is a fallacy, an occasion of the Ad Hominem argument and/or Guilt by Association. Whether the Reductio ad Hitlerum could be thought of an precise fallacy or not appears to fundamentally depend on one's private view of Hitler and the gravity of his crimes.</p><p>Reductionism: (additionally, Oversimplifying, Sloganeering): The fallacy of deceiving an audience by giving easy solutions or bumper-sticker slogans in response to complicated questions, particularly when interesting to much less educated or unsophisticated audiences. E.g., "If the glove doesn’t fit, you need to vote to acquit." Or, "Vote for Snith. He'll carry back jobs!" In science, know-how, engineering and mathematics ("STEM subjects") reductionism is deliberately practiced to make intractable issues computable, e.g., the nicely-recognized humorous suggestion, "First, let's assume the cow is a sphere!". See also, the Plain Truth Fallacy, and Dog-whistle Politics.</p><p>Reifying (also, Mistaking the Map for the Territory): The historical fallacy of treating imaginary mental categories, schemata or names as actual, materials "issues." (E.g., "The War towards Terror is just one other chapter within the eternal struggle to the loss of life between Freedom and Absolute Evil!") Sometimes additionally referred to as "Essentializing" or "Hypostatization." The Romantic Rebel (additionally, the Truthdig / Truthout Fallacy; the Brave Heretic; Conspiracy theories; the Iconoclastic Fallacy): The contemporary fallacy of claiming Truth or validity for one's standpoint solely or primarily as a result of one is supposedly standing up heroically to the dominant "orthodoxy," the current Standard Model, conventional knowledge or Political Correctness, or whatever stands out as the Bandwagon of the moment; a corrupt argument from ethos. E.g., "Back in the day the scientific institution thought that the world was flat, that was until Columbus proved them incorrect! Now they want us to imagine that peculiar water is nothing but H2O. Are you going to consider them? The government is frantically making an attempt to suppress the reality that our public drinking-water supply actually has nitrogen in it and causes congenital vampirism! And what about Area 51? Don't you care? Or are you only a kiss-up for the corrupt scientific institution?" The alternative of the Bandwagon fallacy. The "Save the Children" Fallacy (also, Humanitarian Crisis): A cruel and cynical contemporary media-driven fallacy of pathos, an occasion of the fallacious Appeal to Pity, attracting public assist for intervention in any individual else's crisis in a distant country by repeatedly exhibiting in gross element the extreme (real) suffering of the innocent, defenseless little kids (occasionally extended even to their pets!) on "our" aspect, conveniently ignoring the truth that innocent children on all sides usually suffer the most in any struggle, battle, famine or crisis. Recent (2017) examples embody the so-referred to as "Rohingya" in Myanmar/Burma (ignoring multiple different ethnicities suffering ongoing hunger and conflict in that impoverished country), children in rebel-held areas of Syria (areas held by our rebels, not by the Syrian authorities or by Islamic State rebels), and the children of Mediterranean boat-individuals (mild complected children from the Mideast, Afghanistan and North Africa, however not darker, African-complected youngsters from sub-Saharan international locations, youngsters who are evidently deemed by the media to be far less worthy of pity). Scholar Glen Greenwald points out that a cynical key part of this tactic is hiding the baby and grownup victims of 1's own violence whereas "milking" the tragic, blood-soaked photos of youngsters killed by the "different facet" for each tear they'll generate as a causus belli [a puffed-up excuse for conflict, battle or American/Western intervention]. Scapegoating (additionally, Blamecasting): The historical fallacy that every time something goes fallacious there's always someone aside from oneself to blame. Although sometimes this fallacy is a practical denial of randomness or likelihood itself, at this time it's more usually a mere insurance coverage-pushed business choice ("I don't care if it was an accident! Somebody with deep pockets is gonna pay for this!"), although often scapegoating is no more than a cynical ploy to shield those actually responsible from blame. The term "Scapegoating" is also used to consult with the tactic of casting collective blame on marginalized or scorned "Others," e.g., "The Jews are to blame!" A very corrupt and cynical example of scapegoating is the fallacy of Blaming the Victim, during which one falsely casts the blame for one's personal evil or questionable actions on these affected, e.g., "If you progress an eyelash I'll have to kill you and you will be to blame!" "If you do not bow to our calls for we'll shut down the government and it will be completely YOUR fault!" or "You bi**h, you acted flirty and made me rape you! Then you definitely snitched on me to the cops and allow them to acquire a rape kit on you, and now I'll prison and every little bit of it is your fault!" See additionally, the Affective Fallacy. Scare Tactics (also Appeal to Fear; Paranoia; the Bogeyman Fallacy; Shock Doctrine [ShockDoc]; Rally 'Round the Flag; Rally 'Round the President): Quite a lot of Playing on Emotions, a corrupted argument from pathos, taking advantage of a emergent or intentionally-created disaster and its related public shock, panic and chaos to be able to impose an argument, motion or resolution that would be clearly unacceptable if rigorously considered. E.g., "If you do not shut up and do what I say we're all gonna die! In this moment of disaster we can't afford the luxury of criticizing or making an attempt to second-guess my decisions when our very lives and freedom are in peril! Instead, we must be united as one!" Or, in the (2017) words of former White House Spokesperson Sean Spicer, "That is concerning the security of America!" This fallacy is mentioned at size in Naomi Klein's (2010) The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism and her (2017) No just isn't Enough: Resisting Trump's Shock Politics and Winning the World We need. See additionally, The Shopping Hungry Fallacy, Dog-Whistle Politics, "We Have to do Something!", and The Worst Case Fallacy. "Scoring" (additionally, Moving the Ball Down the sphere, the Sports World Fallacy; "Hey, Sports Fans!"): An instance of defective analogy, the widespread contemporary fallacy of inappropriately and most frequently offensively applying sports activities, gaming, looking or other recreational imagery to unrelated areas of life, equivalent to warfare or intimacy. E.g., "Nope, I haven't scored with Francis but, however last night time I managed to get to third base!" or "We actually must take our ground sport into Kim's half of the field if we ever count on to attain against North Korea." This fallacy is almost all the time soaked in testosterone and machismo. An associated fallacy is that of Evening up the Score (additionally, Getting Even), exacting tit-for-tat vengeance as though life had been some sort of "point-rating" sports activities contest. Counter-arguments to the "Scoring" fallacy normally fall on deaf ears, since the one and solely purpose for playing a game is to "rating," is not it? The Scripted Message (also, Talking Points): A contemporary fallacy related to Big Lie Technique, where a politician or public figure strictly limits her/his statements on a given challenge to repeating carefully scripted, usually exaggerated or empty phrases developed to achieve most acceptance or maximum desired reaction from a target audience. See also, Dog Whistle Politics, and Political Correctness, above. The opposite of this fallacy is that of "Venting." Sending the Wrong Message: A harmful fallacy of logos that assaults a given assertion, argument or motion, no matter how good, true or crucial, because it is going to "ship the unsuitable message." In effect, those who use this fallacy are brazenly confessing to fraud and admitting that the truth will destroy the fragile internet of illusion they've deliberately created by their lies. E.g., "Actually, we have not a clue about how to deal with this crisis, but when we publicly admit it we'll be sending the mistaken message." See also, "Mala Fides."</p><p>Shifting the Burden of Proof: A classic fallacy of logos that challenges an opponent to disprove a declare somewhat than asking the individual making the declare to defend his/her personal argument. E.g., "Lately space-aliens are in every single place among us, masquerading as true humans, even right here on campus! I dare you to prove it is not so! See? You can't! You admit it! That means what I say needs to be true. Likely, you are one of them, since you appear to be so comfortable on area-aliens!" A typical tactic in utilizing this fallacy is first to get an opponent to admit that a far-fetched declare, or some reality associated to it, is certainly no less than theoretically "attainable," after which declare the declare "proven" absent proof to the opposite. E.g., "So you admit that large undetected voter fraud is certainly attainable underneath our current system, and could have happened on this country at least in principle, and you can't produce even the tiniest scintilla of evidence that it didn't truly occur! Ha-ha! I relaxation my case." See additionally, Argument from Ignorance. The Shopping Hungry Fallacy: A fallacy of pathos, a wide range of Playing on Emotions and generally Scare Tactics, making silly but important selections (or being prompted, manipulated or forced to "freely" take public or private choices that may be later regretted but are troublesome to reverse) "in the heat of the second" when beneath the affect of robust emotion (starvation, concern, lust, anger, sadness, regret, fatigue, even joy, love or happiness). E.g., Trevor Noah, (2016) host of the Daily Show on American television attributes public approval of draconian measures within the Patriot Act and the creation of the U. S. Department of Homeland Security to America's "purchasing hungry" instantly after 9/11. See also, Scare Tactics; "We Must Do Something;" and The large "But" Fallacy. The Silent Majority Fallacy: Quite a lot of the argument from ignorance, this fallacy, famously enunciated by disgraced American President Richard Nixon, alleges particular information of a hidden "silent majority" of voters (or of the population on the whole) that stands in support of an in any other case unpopular leader and his/her insurance policies, opposite to the repeated findings of polls, surveys and widespread vote totals. In an excessive case the chief arrogates to him/herself the title of the "Voice of the Voiceless." The Simpleton's Fallacy: (Or, The "Good Simpleton" Fallacy): A corrupt fallacy of logos, described in an undated quote from science writer Isaac Asimov as "The false notion that democracy implies that 'my ignorance is simply as good as your information.'" The title of this fallacy is borrowed from Walter M. Miller Jr.'s basic (1960) put up-apocalyptic novel, A Canticle for Leibowitz, wherein within the centuries after a nuclear holocaust information and learning develop into so despised that "Good Simpleton" becomes the usual type of interpersonal salutation. This fallacy is masterfully portrayed within the particular person of the title character in the 1994 Hollywood movie, "Forrest Gump." The fallacy is extensively alleged to have had an amazing deal to do with the outcome of the 2016 US presidential election, See additionally "Just Plain Folks," and the "Plain Truth Fallacy." U.S. President Barrack Obama famous to the contrary (2016), "In politics and in life, ignorance isn't a advantage. It's not cool to not know what you are speaking about. That's not real or telling it like it is. That's not challenging political correctness. That's simply not knowing what you are speaking about." The time period "Simpleton's Fallacy" has also been used to confer with a misleading strategy of argumentation, feigning ignorance with a purpose to get one's opponent to admit to, explain or overexplain something s/he would somewhat not talk about. E.g., "I see here that you have a associated prior conviction for something referred to as 'Criminal Sodomy.' I could also be a poor, naive simpleton however I'm not quite sure what that fine and fancy lawyer-talk means in plain English. Please explain to the jury in simple terms what exactly you probably did to get convicted of that crime." See also, Argument from Ignorance, and The Third Person Effect. The Slippery Slope (additionally, the Domino Theory): The common fallacy that "one thing inevitably leads to a different." E.g., "When you two go and drink coffee collectively one thing will lead to a different and next factor you already know you'll be pregnant and find yourself spending your life on welfare dwelling in the Projects," or "If we shut Gitmo one thing will lead to a different and earlier than you understand it armed terrorists can be strolling by our church doorways with suicide belts, proud as you please, smack in the middle of the 10:30 a.m. Sunday worship service right right here in Garfield, Kansas!"</p><p>The Snow Job (also Falacia ad Verbosium; Information Bias): A fallacy of logos, "proving" a declare by overwhelming an viewers ("snowing them underneath") with mountains of true but marginally-related paperwork, graphs, words, info, numbers, information and statistics that look extremely spectacular but which the supposed audience can't be anticipated to know or properly consider. This can be a corrupted argument from logos. See also, "Lying with Statistics." The other of this fallacy is the Plain Truth Fallacy. The Soldiers' Honor Fallacy: The historic fallacy that every one who wore a uniform, fought exhausting and followed orders are worthy of some particular honor or glory or are even "heroes," whether or not they fought for freedom or fought to defend slavery, marched below Grant or Lee, Hitler, Stalin, Eisenhower or McArthur, fought to defend their homes, fought for oil or to spread empire, and even fought against and killed U.S. soldiers! A corrupt argument from ethos (that of a soldier), intently related to the "Finish the Job" fallacy ("Sure, he died for a lie, however he deserves honor because he followed orders and did his job faithfully to the tip!"). See additionally "Heroes All." This fallacy was recognized and decisively refuted at the Nuremburg Trials after World War II but remains highly effective to today nonetheless. See also "Blind Loyalty." Related is the State Actor Fallacy, that those that battle and die for his or her country (America, Russia, Iran, the Third Reich, etc.) are worthy of honor or at least pardonable whereas those who struggle for a non-state actor (armed abolitionists, guerrillas, freedom-fighters, jihadis, mujahideen) are not and remain "terrorists" regardless of how noble or vile their cause, till or unless they win and grow to be the recognized state, or are adopted by a state after the actual fact. The usual Version Fallacy: The historic fallacy, a discursive Argumentum advert Baculum, of choosing a "Standard Translation" or "Authorized Version" of an historic or sacred textual content and arbitrarily declaring it "right" and "authoritative," necessarily eliminating much of the poetry and underlying which means of the unique but conveniently quashing any further discussion in regards to the that means of the original textual content, e.g., the Vulgate or The King James Version. The easily demonstrable indisputable fact that translation (beyond three or four words) is neither uniform nor reversible (i.e., by no means comes back exactly the same when retranslated from another language) provides the lie to any efforts to make translation of human languages into an exact science. Islam clearly recognizes this fallacy when characterizing any attempt to translate the sacred textual content of the Holy Qur'an out of the unique Arabic as a "paraphrase" at absolute best. An obverse of this fallacy is the Argumentum advert Mysteriam, above. An extension of the usual Version Fallacy is the Monolingual Fallacy, at an instructional stage the fallacy of ignorantly assuming (as a monolingual individual) that transparent, in-depth translation between languages is the norm, and even doable in any respect, permitting one to conveniently and falsely ignore on a regular basis problems with translation when shut-studying translated literature or academic textual content and idea. At the popular degree the Monolingual Fallacy allows monolinguals to blithely demand that guests, migrants, refugees and newcomers be taught English, both earlier than arriving or else in a single day after arrival in the United States, while applying no such demand to themselves once they go to Asia, Europe, Latin America, and even French-speaking areas of Canada. Not not often, this fallacy descends into gross racism or ethnic discrimination, e.g., the demagogy of warning of "Spanish being spoken right right here on Main Street and taco trucks on every corner!" See also, Othering, and Dog-Whistle Politics. Star Power (also Testimonial, Questionable Authority, Faulty Use of Authority, Falacia ad Vericundiam; Eminence-based Practice): In academia and drugs, a corrupt argument from ethos in which arguments, standpoints and themes of professional discourse are granted fame and validity or condemned to obscurity solely by whoever may be the reigning "stars" or "premier journals" of the profession or discipline for the time being. E.g., "Foster's take on Network Theory has been completely criticized and is so final-week!.This week everybody's into Safe Spaces and Pierce's Theory of Microaggressions. Get with this system." (See additionally, the Bandwagon.) Also applies to an obsession with journal Impact Factors. At the favored stage this fallacy also refers to a corrupt argument from ethos through which public help for a standpoint or product is established by a well known or revered determine (i.e.,. a star athlete or entertainer) who isn't an knowledgeable and who may have been well paid to make the endorsement (e.g., "Olympic gold-medal pole-vaulter Fulano de Tal makes use of Quick Flush Internet--Shouldn’t you?" Or, "My favourite rock star warns that vaccinations unfold cooties, so I'm not vaccinating my kids!" ). Includes different false, meaningless or paid technique of associating oneself or one’s product or standpoint with the ethos of a famous particular person or occasion (e.g., "Try Salsa Cabria, the official taco sauce of the Winter Olympics!"). This fallacy additionally covers Faulty use of Quotes (also, The Devil Quotes Scripture), together with quoting out of context or against the clear intent of the original speaker or author. E.g., racists quoting and twisting the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s statements in favor of racial equality against contemporary activists and movements for racial equality. The Straw Man (also "The Straw Person" ""The Straw Figure"): The fallacy of organising a phony, weak, excessive or ridiculous parody of an opponent's argument and then proceeding to knock it down or scale back it to absurdity with a rhetorical wave of the hand. E.g., "Vegetarians say animals have emotions like you and me. Ever seen a cow snort at a Shakespeare comedy? Vegetarianism is nonsense!" Or, "Pro-choicers hate infants and need to kill them!" Or, "Pro-lifers hate women and need them to spend their lives barefoot, pregnant and chained to the kitchen stove!" A too-frequent instance of this fallacy is that of highlighting probably the most absurd, offensive, foolish or violent examples in a mass movement or demonstration, e.g. "Tree huggers" for environmentalists, "bra burners" for feminists, or "rioters" when there are a dozen violent crazies in a peaceful, disciplined demonstration of 1000's or tens of 1000's, and then falsely portraying these excessive examples as typical of the whole movement with the intention to condemn it with a wave of the hand. See additionally Olfactory Rhetoric. The Taboo (also, Dogmatism):: The ancient fallacy of unilaterally declaring certain "bedrock" arguments, assumptions, dogmas, standpoints or actions "sacrosanct" and not open to discussion, or arbitrarily taking some emotional tones, logical standpoints, doctrines or options "off the table" beforehand. (E.g., " "No, let's not discuss my sexuality," "Don't carry my drinking into this," or "Before we start, it is advisable to know I will not let you play the race card or permit you to attack my arguments by claiming 'That's just what Hitler would say!'") Also applies to discounting or rejecting sure arguments, facts and proof (and even experiences!) out of hand as a result of they're supposedly "against the Bible" or different sacred dogma (See additionally the A Priori Argument). This fallacy sometimes degenerates into a separate, distracting argument over who will get to outline the parameters, tones, dogmas and taboos of the main argument, though at this point reasoned discourse most frequently breaks down and your complete affair turns into a bare Argumentum ad Baculum. See additionally, MYOB, Tone Policing, and Calling "Cards." They're All Crooks: The frequent contemporary fallacy of refusing to get involved in public politics as a result of "all" politicians and politics are allegedly corrupt, ignoring the truth that if that is so in a democratic nation it is exactly because first rate individuals like you and that i refuse to get entangled, leaving the sector open to the "crooks" by default. An example of Circular Reasoning. Related to this fallacy is "They're All Biased," the extremely common contemporary cynical fallacy of ignoring news and news media because none tells the "goal truth" and all push some "agenda." This principally true statement logically requiring audiences to frequently view or learn a wide range of media sources in order to get any approximation of reality, but for many younger individuals in the present day (2017) it means in practice, "Ignore information, information media and public affairs altogether and as a substitute listen to something that is enjoyable, exciting or personally fascinating to you." The sinister implication for democracy is, "Mind your own business and leave all of the 'large' inquiries to your betters, those whose job is to deal with these questions and who're effectively paid to take action." See additionally the Third Person Effect, and Deliberate Ignorance. The "Third Person Effect" (also, "Wise up!" and "They're All Liars"): An instance of the fallacy of Deliberate Ignorance, the arch-cynical postmodern fallacy of intentionally discounting or ignoring media data a priori, opting to remain in ignorance reasonably than "listening to the lies" of the mainstream media, the President, the "medical establishment," professionals, professors, doctors and the "educational elite" or other authorities or data sources, even about pressing subjects (e.g., the necessity for vaccinations) on which these sources are in any other case publicly considered to be usually dependable or relatively trustworthy. In line with Drexel University researchers (2017), the "Third Person Effect ... suggests that individuals will perceive a mass media message to have more affect on others, than themselves. This notion tends to counteract the message's meant 'name-to-motion.' Basically, this suggests that over time people wised up to the truth that some mass media messages were meant to manipulate them -- so the messages grew to become much less and fewer effective." This fallacy appears to be opposite to and an overreaction to the large Lie Technique. See also, Deliberate Ignorance, the Simpleton's Fallacy, and Trust your Gut.</p><p>The "Thousand Flowers" Fallacy (also, "Take names and kick butt."): A complicated, trendy "Argumentum ad Baculum" in which free and open discussion and "brainstorming" are temporarily allowed and inspired (even demanded) within a corporation or nation not primarily so as to listen to and consider opposing views, however somewhat to "smoke out," identify and later punish, fireplace or liquidate dissenters or these not following the Party Line. The name comes from the Thousand Flowers Period in Chinese history when Communist leader Chairman Mao Tse Tung applied this coverage with deadly impact. Throwing Good Money After Bad (additionally, "Sunk Cost Fallacy"): In his glorious guide, Logically Fallacious (2015), Author Bo Bennett describes this fallacy as follows: "Reasoning that additional investment is warranted on the fact that the assets already invested shall be lost otherwise, not bearing in mind the overall losses involved in the further investment." In different words, risking further cash to "save" an earlier, losing funding, ignoring the previous axiom that "Doing the identical thing and anticipating totally different outcomes is the definition of insanity." E.g., "I can't stop betting now, as a result of I already bet the rent and lost, and that i need to win it again or my wife will kill me once i get home!" See also Argument from Inertia.</p><p>TINA (There is no such thing as a Alternative. Also the "Like it or Leave It" Fallacy; "Get over it," "Suck it up," "It's what it's," "Actions/Elections have consequences," or the "Fait Accompli"): A quite common contemporary extension of the both/or fallacy wherein somebody in power quashes vital thought by saying that there isn't any lifelike different to a given standpoint, status or motion, arbitrarily ruling any and all other choices out of bounds, or announcing that a choice has been made and any additional discussion is insubordination, disloyalty, treason, disobedience or simply a waste of valuable time when there's a job to be done. (See also, "Taboo;" "Finish the Job.") TINA is most frequently a bare power-play, a barely extra refined variety of the Argumentum advert Baculum. See additionally Appeal to Closure. Tone Policing. A corrupt argument from pathos and delivery, the fallacy of judging the validity of an argument primarily by its emotional tone of delivery, ignoring the truth that a legitimate fact or argument stays valid whether it is offered calmly and deliberatively or is shouted in a "shrill" or even "hysterical" tone, whether or not carefully written and published in skilled, tutorial language in a respected, peer-reviewed journal or screamed via a bull-horn and peppered with vulgarity. Conversely, a extremely pressing emotional matter is still urgent even if argued coldly and rationally. This fallacy creates a false dichotomy between motive and emotion and thus implicitly favors those who are usually not personally concerned or emotionally invested in an argument, e.g., "I know you are upset, but I will not discuss it with you till you calm down," or "I'd consider what you wrote had been it not for your adolescent overuse of exclamation points throughout the textual content." Or alternately, "You seem to be taking the death of your spouse way too calmly. You're below arrest for homicide. You've got the fitting to stay silent..." Tone Policing is frequent in contemporary discourse of power, significantly in response to discourse of protest, and is occasionally utilized in sexist methods, e.g. the accusation of being "shrill" is sort of at all times used against women, never against males. See also, The F-Bomb.</p><p>Transfer: (additionally, Name Dropping) A corrupt argument from ethos, falsely associating a famous or respected individual, place or thing with an unrelated thesis or standpoint (e.g. putting an image of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. on an advertisement for mattresses, using Genghis Khan, a Mongol who hated Chinese, as the name of a Chinese restaurant, or using the Texas flag to promote more vehicles or pickups in Texas that were made in Detroit, Kansas City or Korea). This fallacy is widespread in contemporary academia within the form of utilizing a profusion of scholarly-wanting citations from respected authorities to lend a false gravitas to in any other case specious ideas or textual content. See also "Star Power." Trust your Gut (additionally, Trust your Heart; Trust Your Feelings; Trust your Intuition; Trust your Instincts; Emotional Reasoning): A corrupt argument from pathos, the historic fallacy of relying primarily on "gut feelings" slightly than purpose or evidence to make choices. A current (2017) Ohio State University examine finds, unsurprisingly, that individuals who "belief their gut" are considerably extra vulnerable to falling for "fake news," phony conspiracy theories, frauds and scams than those who insist on hard evidence or logic. See also Deliberate Ignorance, the Affective Fallacy, and The "Third Person Effect."</p><p>Tu Quoque ("You Do it Too!"; also, Two Wrongs Make a Right): A corrupt argument from ethos, the fallacy of defending a shaky or false standpoint or excusing one's personal dangerous motion by declaring that one's opponent's acts, ideology or personal character are additionally open to query, or are even perhaps worse than one's own. E.g., "Sure, we may have tortured prisoners and killed youngsters with drones, however we don't minimize off heads like they do!" Or, "You can't stand there and accuse me of corruption! You guys are all into politics and you already know what we should do to get reelected!" Unusual, self-deprecating variants on this fallacy are the Ego / Nos Quoque Fallacies ("I / we do it too!"), minimizing or defending one other's evil actions because I'm / we are responsible of the identical thing or of even worse. E.g., In response to allegations that Russian Premier Vladimir Putin is a "killer," American President Donald Trump (2/2017) advised an interviewer, "There are a lot of killers. We've obtained a number of killers. What, do you think our nation's so innocent?" This fallacy is said to the Red Herring and to the Ad Hominem Argument.</p><p>Two-sides Fallacy (additionally, Teach the Controversy): The presentation of an issue that makes it seem to have two sides of equal weight or significance, when in truth a consensus or a lot stronger argument helps only one facet. Also known as "false balance" or "false equivalence." (Due to Teaching Tolerance for this definition!) E.g,. "Scientists theorize that the Earth is a sphere, however there are all the time two sides to any argument: Others consider that the Earth is flat and is perched on the again of a large turtle, and a truly balanced presentation of the problem requires teaching each explanations with out bias or unduly favoring both side over the other." Two Truths (also, Compartmentalization; Epistemically Closed Systems; Alternative Truth): A very corrupt and harmful fallacy of logos and ethos, first formally described in medieval times however nonetheless widespread in the present day, holding that there exists one "truth" in one given environment (e.g., in science, work or faculty) and concurrently a distinct, formally contradictory however equally true "fact" in a distinct epistemic system, context, atmosphere, intended viewers or discourse neighborhood (e.g., in a single's religion or at residence). This may result in a state of affairs of stable cognitive dissonance the place, as UC Irvine scholar Dr. Carter T. Butts describes it (2016), "I know but do not believe," making rational discussion tough, painful or unattainable. This fallacy additionally describes the discourse of politicians who cynically proclaim one "reality" as mere "campaign rhetoric" used "to mobilize the bottom," or "for domestic consumption only," and a quite different and contradictory "truth" for extra common or practical functions once in office. See also Disciplinary Blinders; Alternative Truth. Venting (additionally, Letting off Steam; Loose Lips): In the Venting fallacy an individual argues that her/his phrases are or should be exempt from criticism or consequence as a result of s/he was "solely venting," although this very admission implies that the one "venting" was, at lengthy final, freely expressing his/her true, heartfelt and uncensored opinion about the matter in query. This same fallacy applies to minimizing, denying the importance of or excusing different forms of frank, unguarded or uninhibited offensive expression as mere "Locker-room Talk," "Alpha-male Speech" or nothing but cute, adorable, perhaps even sexy "Bad-boy Talk." See additionally, the Affective Fallacy. Opposite to this fallacy are the fallacies of Political Correctness and the Scripted Message, above.</p><p>Venue: The ancient fallacy of Venue, a corrupt argument from kairos, falsely and arbitrarily invalidates an in any other case-valid argument or piece of evidence because it is supposedly supplied within the wrong place, on the incorrect moment or in an inappropriate courtroom, medium or discussion board. Based on PhD scholar Amanda Thran, "Quite often, people will say to me in person that Facebook, Twitter, etc. are 'not the proper forums' for discussing politically and socially sensitive points. ... In this similar vein, I’ve additionally encountered the following argument: 'Facebook, which is used for sharing wedding ceremony, child, and pet photographs, is an inappropriate place for political discourse; people don’t wished to be burdened with that after they log in.' In my experience, this line of reasoning is most often employed (and abused) to shut down a dialog when one feels they are dropping it. Ironically, I have seen it used when the argument has already been transpiring on the platform [in] an already lengthy dialogue." See additionally Disciplinary Blinders. We Have to Do Something: (also, the Placebo Effect; Political Theater; Security Theater; We should send a message): The harmful contemporary fallacy that when "People are scared / Persons are offended / Persons are fed up / Individuals are hurting / People need change" it becomes necessary to do one thing, something, without delay without stopping to ask "What?" or "Why?", even if what is completed is an overreaction, is a completely ineffective sham, an inert placebo, or truly makes the situation worse, somewhat than "just sitting there doing nothing." (E.g., "Banning air passengers from carrying ham sandwiches onto the airplane and making parents take off their newborn infants' tiny pink child-shoes most likely does nothing to deter potential terrorists, but persons are scared and we need to do something to answer this crisis!") This is a badly corrupted argument from pathos. (See also "Scare Tactic" and "The large 'But' Fallacy.")</p><p>Where there’s Smoke, there’s Fire (additionally Hasty Conclusion; Jumping to a Conclusion): The harmful fallacy of ignorantly drawing a snap conclusion and/or taking motion with out sufficient evidence. E.g., "Captain! The man sitting subsequent to me in coach has dark pores and skin and is studying a ebook in some kind of funny language all filled with accent marks, bizarre squiggles above the "N's" and upside-down question marks. It have to be Arabic! Get him off the plane earlier than he blows us all to kingdom come!" A wide range of the "Just in Case" fallacy. The alternative of this fallacy is the "Paralysis of Analysis."</p><p>The Wisdom of the crowd (also, The Magic of the Market; the Wikipedia Fallacy; Crowdsourcing): A quite common contemporary fallacy that people could also be improper but "the group" or "the market" is infallible, ignoring historic examples like witch-burning, lynching, and the market crash of 2008. This fallacy is why most American schools and universities at the moment (2017) ban college students from using Wikipedia as a critical reference supply.</p><p>The Worst-Case Fallacy (additionally, "Just in case;" "We can't afford to take possibilities;" "An abundance of warning;" "Better Safe than Sorry;" "Better to prevent than to lament."): A pessimistic fallacy by which one’s reasoning is based on an improbable, far-fetched and even completely imaginary worst-case scenario quite than on actuality. This plays on pathos (concern) rather than motive, and is usually politically motivated. E.g., "What if armed terrorists had been to assault your county grain elevator tomorrow morning at daybreak? Are you able to struggle again? Better stock up on assault rifles and ammunition right this moment, simply in case!" See also Scare Tactics. The other of this is the Positive Thinking Fallacy. The Worst Negates the Bad (also, Be Grateful for What You've Got): The extraordinarily frequent modern logical fallacy that an objectively bad situation someway is not so bad just because it may have been far worse, or because somebody, someplace has it even worse. E.g., "I cried as a result of I had no footwear, till I saw somebody who had no feet." Or, "You're protesting since you earn only $7.25 an hour? You can simply as easily be out on the road! I occur to know there are folks in Uttar Pradesh who're doing the very same work you are doing for one tenth of what you're making, they usually're pathetically glad just to have work in any respect. You'll want to shut up, put down that picket signal, get back to work for what I care to pay you, and thank me each and every single day for providing you with a job!" Zero Tolerance (additionally, Zero Risk Bias, Broken Windows Policing, Disproportionate Response; Even One is simply too Many; Exemplary Punishment; Judenrein): The contemporary fallacy of declaring an "emergency" and promising to disregard justice and due course of and commit limitless assets (and sometimes, limitless cruelty) to stamp out a restricted, insignificant or even nonexistent drawback. E.g., "I just read about an actual case of cannibalism somewhere in this country. That's disgusting, and even one case is means, manner too many! We want a Federal Taskforce in opposition to Cannibalism with one million-greenback finances and offices in every state, a nationwide SCAN program in all of the grade faculties (Stop Cannibalism in America Now!), and an automated double demise penalty for cannibals; in different phrases, zero tolerance for cannibalism on this nation!" This can be a corrupt and cynical argument from pathos, virtually at all times politically pushed, a very sinister variety of Dog Whistle Politics and the "We Should do Something" fallacy. See additionally, "Playing on Emotions," "Red Herring," and also the "Big Lie Technique." OW 7/06 with thanks to the late Susan Spence. Final revision 1/18, with particular due to Business Insider, Teaching Tolerance, and Vox.com, to Bradley Steffens, to Jackson Katz, Brian Resnick, Glen Greenwald, Lara Bhasin, Danelle M. Pecht, Marc Lawson, Eimar O'Duffy, and Mike Caetano, to Dr. William Lorimer, Dr. Carter T. Butts, Dr. Bo Bennett, Myron Peto, Joel Sax, Thomas Persing, Amanda Thran, and to all the others who advised corrections, additions and clarifications. Links to Amazon.com on this page are for reader convenience only, and no endorsement is obtainable or implied. This list is now not being maintained, but please proceed to copy, mirror, update and share it freely.</p><p>In case you loved this information and you wish to receive details concerning <a href="https://yorikoh2.com/">yorikoh2.com</a> i implore you to visit our webpage.</p>
Mai multe informații despre formatele text
Plain text
Etichetele HTML nu sunt permise.
Adresele de situri web şi adresele de e-mail se transformă automat în linkuri.
Liniile şi paragrafele sunt rupte automat.
Document
- Niciuna -
Manual REGIS - Monitorul Oficial Local.pdf
doc00667820200107112915.pdf
doc00668920200107115843.pdf
doc00669120200107120237.pdf
doc00669320200107121032.pdf
doc00672120200107172352.pdf
doc00676020200109131833.pdf
doc00676320200109134519.pdf
doc00676420200109135325.pdf
doc00677020200109165948.pdf
doc00678120200110130729.pdf
doc00685020200113150548.pdf
doc00685120200113151228.pdf
doc00685420200113190912.pdf
doc00686520200114151809.pdf
doc00694320200116150440.pdf
doc00700020200120104126.pdf
doc00700120200120111825.pdf
doc00703420200120174420.pdf
doc00703520200120174756.pdf
doc00708720200121192237.pdf
doc00709420200122122346.pdf
doc00715620200123145833.pdf
doc00731720200128111353.pdf
doc00734920200128171847.pdf
doc00735020200128172334.pdf
doc00739320200129171511.pdf
doc00739620200129173441.pdf
doc00739720200129173800.pdf
doc00739820200129174115.pdf
doc00743020200131120726.pdf
doc00743120200131123438.pdf
doc00743220200131124243.pdf
doc00746520200203104121.pdf
doc00746620200203104915.pdf
doc00746720200203105212.pdf
doc00746820200203105513.pdf
doc00746920200203110049.pdf
doc00747020200203110235.pdf
doc00747120200203110438.pdf
doc00747220200203110623.pdf
doc00747320200203110722.pdf
doc00747420200203110941.pdf
doc00747520200203111045.pdf
doc00747620200203111220.pdf
doc00747720200203111433.pdf
doc00747820200203111524.pdf
doc00747920200203111736.pdf
doc00748020200203111915.pdf
doc00748120200203112012.pdf
doc00748220200203112405.pdf
doc00748320200203112607.pdf
doc00748420200203112741.pdf
doc00748520200203112931.pdf
doc00748620200203113125.pdf
doc00748720200203113232.pdf
doc00748820200203113356.pdf
doc00748920200203113454.pdf
doc00749020200203113549.pdf
doc00749120200203113642.pdf
doc00749220200203114206.pdf
doc00749320200203114625.pdf
doc00749420200203114738.pdf
doc00749520200203115025.pdf
doc00749620200203115221.pdf
doc00749720200203115331.pdf
doc00749820200203115431.pdf
doc00749920200203115534.pdf
doc00750020200203115623.pdf
doc00750120200203115717.pdf
doc00750220200203120018.pdf
doc00750420200203123005.pdf
doc00750520200203123242.pdf
doc00750620200203123345.pdf
doc00750720200203123515.pdf
doc00750820200203123618.pdf
doc00750920200203123735.pdf
doc00751020200203123836.pdf
doc00751120200203123933.pdf
doc00751220200203124027.pdf
doc00751320200203124115.pdf
doc00751420200203124201.pdf
doc00751520200203124301.pdf
doc00751620200203124409.pdf
doc00751720200203124619.pdf
doc00751820200203124959.pdf
doc00751920200203125207.pdf
doc00752020200203125345.pdf
doc00752120200203125434.pdf
doc00752220200203125522.pdf
doc00752320200203125611.pdf
doc00752420200203125718.pdf
doc00752520200203130341.pdf
doc00752620200203130449.pdf
doc00752720200203130538.pdf
doc00752920200203132728.pdf
doc00753020200203132839.pdf
doc00753120200203132946.pdf
doc00753220200203133036.pdf
doc00753320200203133119.pdf
doc00753420200203133300.pdf
doc00753520200203133348.pdf
doc00753620200203133434.pdf
doc00753720200203133518.pdf
doc00753820200203133716.pdf
doc00753920200203133759.pdf
doc00754020200203133845.pdf
doc00754120200203133927.pdf
doc00754220200203134012.pdf
doc00754320200203134056.pdf
doc00754520200203141205.pdf
doc00755420200203145843.pdf
doc00755520200203150352.pdf
doc00755920200203151109.pdf
doc00756020200203151349.pdf
doc00756120200203151621.pdf
doc00756220200203151907.pdf
doc00756420200203181941.pdf
doc00767120200205135210.pdf
doc00767320200205135457.pdf
doc00767420200205140312.pdf
doc00767520200205140551.pdf
doc00767620200205140949.pdf
doc00767720200205142803.pdf
doc00767820200205144137.pdf
doc00767920200205144409.pdf
doc00768020200205144605.pdf
doc00768120200205144832.pdf
doc00768320200205145248.pdf
doc00768420200205145501.pdf
doc00768520200205145802.pdf
doc00768620200205150508.pdf
doc00768720200205152703.pdf
doc00768820200205152902.pdf
doc00768920200205153225.pdf
doc00769020200205153720.pdf
doc00769120200205154041.pdf
doc00769220200205154300.pdf
doc00769320200205154514.pdf
doc00769420200205154651.pdf
doc00769520200205154818.pdf
doc00769620200205155128.pdf
doc00769720200205155520.pdf
doc00769820200205155834.pdf
doc00769920200205160208.pdf
doc00770020200205160614.pdf
doc00770120200205160837.pdf
doc00770220200205161058.pdf
doc00770320200205161353.pdf
doc00770420200205161503.pdf
doc00770520200205161814.pdf
doc00770620200205162000.pdf
doc00770720200205162138.pdf
doc00770820200205162450.pdf
doc00770920200205164449.pdf
doc00771120200205165315.pdf
doc00771220200205165709.pdf
doc00771320200205174728.pdf
doc00771420200205174927.pdf
doc00771520200205175507.pdf
doc00771620200205175704.pdf
doc00771720200205180235.pdf
doc00771820200205180627.pdf
doc00771920200205181108.pdf
doc00772020200205182132.pdf
doc00772120200205182341.pdf
doc00772220200205182602.pdf
doc00772320200205182815.pdf
doc00772420200205183204.pdf
doc00772520200205183327.pdf
doc00772620200205183449.pdf
doc00772720200205183634.pdf
doc00772820200205183827.pdf
doc00772920200205184015.pdf
doc00773020200205184539.pdf
doc00773120200205184850.pdf
doc00773220200205185107.pdf
doc00773320200205185402.pdf
doc00773420200205185635.pdf
doc00773520200205190532.pdf
doc00775820200206183920.pdf
doc00775920200206184805.pdf
doc00778120200207132937.pdf
doc00778520200207134544.pdf
doc00778820200207135404.pdf
doc00778920200207135638.pdf
doc00779120200207140015.pdf
doc00779220200207140251.pdf
doc00779320200207140542.pdf
doc00779520200207141230.pdf
doc00779620200207141714.pdf
doc00779720200207142000.pdf
doc00786320200210124653.pdf
doc00790920200211182653.pdf
doc00798720200213162548.pdf
doc00798820200213162734.pdf
doc00800820200214183748.pdf
doc00802420200217152029.pdf
doc00802520200217152130.pdf
doc00802620200217153019.pdf
doc00802920200217180018.pdf
doc00803020200217180740.pdf
doc00804520200218182225.pdf
doc00804620200218183500.pdf
doc00806320200219125830.pdf
doc00806420200219130257.pdf
doc00806720200219130815.pdf
doc00806820200219131225.pdf
doc00808620200219181402.pdf
doc00811220200220152914.pdf
doc00813720200224123649.pdf
doc00813920200224125523.pdf
doc00814020200224131146.pdf
doc00814120200224131944.pdf
doc00814220200224132206.pdf
doc00814320200224132808.pdf
doc00815320200224155031.pdf
doc00815420200224160422.pdf
doc00817520200225115117.pdf
doc00817820200225121248.pdf
doc00825120200225185803.pdf
doc00825220200225190149.pdf
doc00825320200225190410.pdf
doc00833020200227150649.pdf
doc00833620200227173502.pdf
doc00833720200227174121.pdf
doc00833820200227174259.pdf
doc00847720200303152218.pdf
doc00865420200306113022.pdf
doc00865820200306114813.pdf
doc00866220200306121032.pdf
doc00866320200306121607.pdf
doc00866420200306122351.pdf
doc00866520200306122758.pdf
doc00866720200306123901.pdf
doc00866920200306124321.pdf
doc00867120200306125449.pdf
doc00867220200306130449.pdf
doc00867320200306133341.pdf
doc00867420200306134338.pdf
doc00867520200306135228.pdf
doc00867620200306140003.pdf
doc00868520200309115110.pdf
doc00868620200309115323.pdf
doc00881920200311172650.pdf
doc00882120200311183443.pdf
doc00885620200312151702.pdf
doc00885720200312152125.pdf
doc00885820200312152402.pdf
doc00885920200312152838.pdf
doc00886020200312153023.pdf
doc00886120200312153246.pdf
doc00890920200313141932.pdf
doc00891020200313142738.pdf
doc00891120200313143812.pdf
doc00896920200316123820.pdf
doc00897020200316124925.pdf
doc00897120200316130738.pdf
doc00897220200316131155.pdf
doc00897620200316160539.pdf
doc00899420200317120207.pdf
doc00899520200317120955.pdf
doc00899620200317121722.pdf
doc00899720200317122652.pdf
doc00899820200317123343.pdf
doc00899920200317123808.pdf
doc00903620200318120856.pdf
doc00903820200318153843.pdf
doc00908520200319121848.pdf
doc00911420200319134447.pdf
doc00911520200319134739.pdf
doc00916820200323140636.pdf
doc00925820200326135439.pdf
doc00926220200326144518.pdf
doc00926420200326145137.pdf
doc00926520200326145624.pdf
doc00926720200326150539.pdf
doc00928320200326180743.pdf
doc00928420200326182058.pdf
doc00937320200331173946.pdf
doc00937420200331174306.pdf
doc00937520200331174752.pdf
doc00940220200401150308.pdf
doc00945320200403112140.pdf
doc00945420200403113926.pdf
doc00945620200403121217.pdf
doc00947620200403164833.pdf
doc00949220200406175549.pdf
doc00953420200408130558.pdf
doc00953520200408130927.pdf
doc00955620200409115353.pdf
doc00955720200409120022.pdf
doc00955820200409120314.pdf
doc00956120200409123032.pdf
doc00956220200409123600.pdf
doc00956320200409123712.pdf
doc00956420200409123918.pdf
doc00956520200409124209.pdf
doc00958820200410113315.pdf
doc00960620200414115943.pdf
doc00960720200414120024.pdf
doc00980520200422153513.pdf
doc00982620200424112422.pdf
doc00982720200424112704.pdf
doc00982820200424114901.pdf
doc00982920200424115215.pdf
doc00988620200428101611.pdf
doc00988720200428101759.pdf
doc00990620200428163205.pdf
doc00990720200428163559.pdf
doc00990820200428164126.pdf
doc00990920200428164708.pdf
doc00991020200428164956.pdf
doc00991120200428165355.pdf
doc00993820200430134908.pdf
doc00994220200430153749.pdf
doc00994320200430164311.pdf
doc00994420200430164649.pdf
doc00994520200430165555.pdf
doc01003320200504183158.pdf
doc01003420200504183852.pdf
doc01015820200507121608.pdf
doc01015920200507122425.pdf
doc01024020200511120202.pdf
doc01024220200511121145.pdf
doc01025320200511165842.pdf
doc01036520200515150407.pdf
doc01036620200515150620.pdf
doc01036720200515150734.pdf
doc01036920200515160256.pdf
doc01042320200519112433.pdf
doc01037020200515164223.pdf
doc01044520200521133241.pdf
doc01045220200522121508.pdf
doc01045320200522123233.pdf
doc01045420200522123451.pdf
doc01045520200522123736.pdf
doc01045620200522124126.pdf
doc01045720200522124546.pdf
doc01045820200522125020.pdf
doc01045920200522125458.pdf
doc01046020200522125721.pdf
doc01046120200522130121.pdf
doc01046220200522130303.pdf
doc01046320200522131026.pdf
doc01046420200522131226.pdf
doc01046520200522131701.pdf
doc01046620200522131837.pdf
doc01046720200522132818.pdf
doc01046820200522133209.pdf
doc01046920200522133935.pdf
doc01047020200522134045.pdf
doc01047120200522134448.pdf
doc01047220200522134651.pdf
doc01047320200522135228.pdf
doc01047420200522135349.pdf
doc01052820200525164103.pdf
doc01052920200525164454.pdf
doc01054320200526120841.pdf
doc01054420200526121622.pdf
doc01056320200526152739.pdf
doc01056420200526153251.pdf
doc01057720200527122630.pdf
doc01059520200528122310.pdf
doc01065420200602093022.pdf
doc01065520200602095318.pdf
doc01067120200602123602.pdf
doc01067220200602123829.pdf
doc01067320200602124151.pdf
doc01074920200603114807.pdf
doc01077220200603164332.pdf
doc01077420200603173034.pdf
doc01077520200603173214.pdf
doc01087520200605133424.pdf
doc01087620200605133633.pdf
doc01095420200610115329.pdf
doc01097520200610154343.pdf
doc01119220200615104106.pdf
doc01119320200615105009.pdf
doc01119920200615124750.pdf
doc01120020200615125053.pdf
doc01126720200616133535.pdf
doc01126820200616133758.pdf
doc01126920200616134221.pdf
doc01130820200617124412.pdf
doc01130920200617130401.pdf
doc01138820200619103519.pdf
doc01147420200623165537.pdf
doc01147520200623165848.pdf
doc01147620200623170708.pdf
doc01151320200624151044.pdf
doc01155820200626121721.pdf
doc01157620200629123504.pdf
doc01158220200629132629.pdf
doc01159120200629150305.pdf
doc01159220200629150544.pdf
doc01159320200629150829.pdf
doc01159520200629151054.pdf
doc01159620200629151419.pdf
doc01159720200629151739.pdf
doc01160820200630104840.pdf
doc01161020200630111031.pdf
doc01161120200630111312.pdf
doc01161420200630112319.pdf
doc01161520200630112420.pdf
doc01161620200630112509.pdf
doc01168520200630172657.pdf
doc01168620200630172929.pdf
doc01188820200707170109.pdf
doc01188920200707170456.pdf
doc01189020200707171343.pdf
doc01189120200707171614.pdf
doc01189220200707173203.pdf
doc01198120200710173515.pdf
doc01198320200710173745.pdf
doc01207820200714143834.pdf
doc01207920200714144152.pdf
doc01208020200714144650.pdf
doc01208120200714144821.pdf
doc01210220200714182524.pdf
doc01210320200714182645.pdf
doc01210420200714182944.pdf
doc01210520200714183152.pdf
doc01219920200717103055.pdf
doc01220120200717105937.pdf
doc01228320200721174507.pdf
doc01228420200721174639.pdf
doc01228920200722124024.pdf
doc01229020200722124222.pdf
doc01233620200724100847.pdf
doc01233720200724102321.pdf
doc01233820200724111559.pdf
doc01233920200724133137.pdf
doc01234020200724133409.pdf
doc01238520200728125039.pdf
doc01238620200728125351.pdf
doc01238720200728125808.pdf
doc01238820200728125937.pdf
doc01238920200728132645.pdf
doc01247320200729150611.pdf
doc01254820200730180200.pdf
doc01254920200730180329.pdf
doc01255020200730180631.pdf
doc01255120200730180832.pdf
doc01255220200730181036.pdf
doc01255320200730181150.pdf
doc01256820200731132401.pdf
doc01257720200803130106.pdf
doc01262320200804153236.pdf
doc01262620200804171452.pdf
doc01264120200805160706.pdf
doc01287320200812132157.pdf
doc01295920200817141412.pdf
doc01296020200817142936.pdf
doc01296120200817151459.pdf
doc01296220200817151906.pdf
doc01296320200817152148.pdf
doc01299720200818162402.pdf
doc01299820200818162750.pdf
doc01299920200818163037.pdf
doc01305720200820162351.pdf
doc01305820200820162640.pdf
doc01305920200820162913.pdf
doc01306020200820163617.pdf
doc01313120200824163510.pdf
doc01313520200824171845.pdf
doc01313620200824174003.pdf
doc01316720200825170433.pdf
doc01316820200825170946.pdf
doc01316920200825171229.pdf
doc01317020200825171727.pdf
doc01320420200827102926.pdf
doc01320520200827103343.pdf
doc01320620200827103551.pdf
doc01320720200827103726.pdf
doc01320820200827104055.pdf
doc01320920200827104332.pdf
doc01321020200827104721.pdf
doc01321120200827104901.pdf
doc01324320200827154324.pdf
doc01324620200827155204.pdf
doc01324820200827155806.pdf
doc01324920200827160120.pdf
doc01325020200827160545.pdf
doc01325120200827162143.pdf
doc01354420200910125701.pdf
doc01354620200910131908.pdf
doc01354720200910132423.pdf
doc01354820200910133233.pdf
doc01354920200910133648.pdf
doc01355220200910135508.pdf
doc01355620200910140426.pdf
doc01355720200910141149.pdf
doc01355820200910141428.pdf
doc01356120200910141840.pdf
doc01356220200910142610.pdf
doc01356320200910142830.pdf
doc01356520200910144229.pdf
doc01356620200910144413.pdf
doc01356720200910144811.pdf
doc01386220200916102440.pdf
doc01386420200916103351.pdf
doc01386520200916103650.pdf
doc01386620200916103907.pdf
doc01386720200916104134.pdf
doc01386820200916104709.pdf
doc01387220200916110212.pdf
doc01390020200916161520.pdf
doc01390120200916162027.pdf
doc01398820200917175644.pdf
doc01398920200917180455.pdf
doc01415120200918175635.pdf
doc01415220200918175954.pdf
doc01487620200929105425.pdf
doc01487720200929120554.pdf
doc01487820200929121637.pdf
doc01487920200929123557.pdf
doc01488220200929130857.pdf
doc01488320200929134722.pdf
doc01488420200929135715.pdf
doc01488520200929140401.pdf
doc01488620200929140823.pdf
doc01488720200929141003.pdf
doc01488820200929141136.pdf
doc01488920200929142239.pdf
doc01497720201001150504.pdf
doc01497820201001150816.pdf
doc01498020201001152642.pdf
doc01498120201001152948.pdf
doc01498220201001153211.pdf
doc01498320201001153324.pdf
doc01508220201005151350.pdf
doc01524520201009161230.pdf
doc01524620201009162429.pdf
doc01527720201012160236.pdf
doc01529020201013113747.pdf
doc01535720201015125107.pdf
doc01535820201015130529.pdf
doc01535920201015131205.pdf
doc01536020201015132829.pdf
doc01536220201015133258.pdf
doc01536320201015133701.pdf
doc01537020201015140637.pdf
doc01537120201015141130.pdf
doc01537320201015143950.pdf
doc01537420201015144908.pdf
doc01541120201016111649.pdf
doc01541220201016112140.pdf
doc01541320201016114005.pdf
doc01541420201016114316.pdf
doc01547220201019155816.pdf
doc01547920201020113525.pdf
doc01548020201020124252.pdf
doc01556520201021153256.pdf
doc01573520201027145623.pdf
doc01573620201027145911.pdf
doc01573720201027150139.pdf
doc01573820201027150632.pdf
doc01574120201027152817.pdf
doc01574420201027154058.pdf
doc01578820201028125436.pdf
doc01579320201028130608.pdf
doc01579720201028140921.pdf
doc01579820201028141349.pdf
doc01579920201028145850.pdf
doc01580220201028151301.pdf
doc01580320201028151508.pdf
doc01580420201028160253.pdf
doc01582920201030144300.pdf
doc01583020201030150435.pdf
doc01583120201030150928.pdf
doc01583220201030152331.pdf
doc01588420201102165002.pdf
doc01591320201103123515.pdf
doc01591420201103123857.pdf
doc01591620201103124130.pdf
doc01602420201104155453.pdf
doc01602520201104160835.pdf
doc01604220201105120323.pdf
doc01604320201105120556.pdf
doc01604620201105125158.pdf
doc01604720201105125401.pdf
doc01604820201105125700.pdf
doc01604920201105130205.pdf
doc01605020201105130508.pdf
doc01605120201105131240.pdf
doc01605220201105133251.pdf
doc01605320201105133406.pdf
doc01605420201105134050.pdf
doc01605520201105135338.pdf
doc01605720201105142510.pdf
doc01605820201105143035.pdf
doc01606620201105182304.pdf
doc01612520201109120345.pdf
doc01612620201109121337.pdf
doc01612720201109121510.pdf
doc01612920201109122817.pdf
doc01626120201110174806.pdf
doc01633820201112132904.pdf
doc01633920201112133338.pdf
doc01641820201113163253.pdf
doc01643620201116112754.pdf
doc01643720201116114108.pdf
doc01643820201116114357.pdf
doc01643920201116115824.pdf
doc01644020201116120048.pdf
doc01644120201116120512.pdf
doc01644220201116120927.pdf
doc01644420201116121613.pdf
doc01644520201116122046.pdf
doc01649720201116140049.pdf
doc01650920201116142015.pdf
doc01651120201116142325.pdf
doc01652320201116165032.pdf
doc01659320201117173214.pdf
doc01659420201117174049.pdf
doc01661920201118143906.pdf
doc01662020201118145136.pdf
doc01662120201118145337.pdf
doc01667920201119171948.pdf
doc01671720201123112605.pdf
doc01671820201123113136.pdf
doc01678920201124204606.pdf
doc01679020201124204931.pdf
doc01679120201124205408.pdf
doc01679220201124205654.pdf
doc01679320201124210046.pdf
doc01679420201124210216.pdf
doc01679520201124210348.pdf
doc01679620201124210513.pdf
doc01679720201124210707.pdf
doc01679820201124210826.pdf
doc01679920201124211258.pdf
doc01680020201124211447.pdf
doc01680120201124211619.pdf
doc01680220201124211744.pdf
doc01680320201124211936.pdf
doc01680420201124212122.pdf
doc01680520201124212550.pdf
doc01680620201124212712.pdf
doc01682320201125132516.pdf
doc01682420201125132752.pdf
doc01682520201125135134.pdf
doc01682620201125135459.pdf
doc01682720201125140934.pdf
doc01683920201126135016.pdf
doc01684020201126135420.pdf
doc01684120201126135850.pdf
doc01684320201126140614.pdf
doc01684720201126163104.pdf
doc01705420201203184121.pdf
doc01705520201203184621.pdf
doc01705620201203184839.pdf
doc01705720201203185405.pdf
doc01706220201204160646.pdf
doc01716920201208173054.pdf
doc01717020201208173334.pdf
doc01717220201208173751.pdf
doc01717320201208173949.pdf
doc01717420201208174215.pdf
doc01717520201208174454.pdf
doc01717720201208182501.pdf
doc01717820201208182710.pdf
doc01717920201208183049.pdf
doc01719420201209161054.pdf
doc01719520201209162455.pdf
doc01720920201210122923.pdf
doc01721020201210123107.pdf
doc01723620201210160441.pdf
doc01723920201210160746.pdf
doc01728020201214115551.pdf
doc01728120201214115957.pdf
doc01739720201215182148.pdf
doc01739820201215182425.pdf
doc01739920201215182547.pdf
doc01740320201215183055.pdf
doc01740420201215183351.pdf
doc01740520201215183557.pdf
doc01740620201215183827.pdf
doc01740720201215184015.pdf
doc01741620201216150128.pdf
doc01741720201216151219.pdf
doc01749020201217105924.pdf
doc01749120201217110346.pdf
doc01759220201221180630.pdf
doc01759320201221180853.pdf
doc01762420201222135613.pdf
doc01762520201222140951.pdf
doc01763320201222172250.pdf
doc01763420201222172727.pdf
doc01770020201228161011.pdf
doc01770120201228161351.pdf
doc01770220201228161710.pdf
doc01770320201228161922.pdf
doc01770420201228162206.pdf
doc01770520201228162749.pdf
doc01770620201228163019.pdf
doc01770720201228180123.pdf
doc01772420201229163018.pdf
doc01772520201229163407.pdf
doc01772620201229164551.pdf
doc01772720201229164741.pdf
doc01772920201229165435.pdf
doc01773020201229165602.pdf
doc01773120201229165839.pdf
doc01773220201229170018.pdf
doc01773320201229170403.pdf
doc01773420201229170625.pdf
doc01773520201229171645.pdf
doc01773620201229171820.pdf
doc01773720201229172220.pdf
doc01773920201229172820.pdf
doc01774020201229173447.pdf
doc01774120201229173925.pdf
doc01776620201230125009.pdf
doc01776720201230125325.pdf
doc01776920201230130117.pdf
doc01777020201230131221.pdf
doc01777720201230164400.pdf
doc01785320210108113928.pdf
doc01785420210108114529.pdf
doc01785520210108115113.pdf
doc01785620210108120326.pdf
doc01785720210108120846.pdf
doc01794420210111134249.pdf
doc01795620210111152113.pdf
doc01802020210113151156.pdf
doc01802220210113151611.pdf
doc01802320210113151810.pdf
doc01802420210113153354.pdf
doc01802520210113153536.pdf
doc01802620210113154136.pdf
doc01802720210113154525.pdf
doc01802820210113160335.pdf
doc01803020210113161301.pdf
doc01803120210113161443.pdf
doc01804720210114121211.pdf
doc01804820210114121513.pdf
doc01805020210114143001.pdf
doc01805120210114143121.pdf
doc01807120210118112557.pdf
doc01807220210118115546.pdf
doc01807320210118120029.pdf
doc01807420210118120408.pdf
doc01807520210118120646.pdf
doc01807620210118121820.pdf
doc01809120210118201302.pdf
doc01826820210122151459.pdf
doc01826920210122151931.pdf
doc01827020210122152239.pdf
doc01827220210122153822.pdf
doc01828820210126123734.pdf
doc01829120210126125803.pdf
doc01829220210126130033.pdf
doc01829320210126130140.pdf
doc01829420210126130246.pdf
doc01829520210126130527.pdf
doc01830120210126143138.pdf
doc01834420210126192839.pdf
doc01834620210126193109.pdf
doc01834720210126193210.pdf
doc01834820210126193305.pdf
doc01834920210126193405.pdf
doc01835020210126193455.pdf
doc01835120210126193603.pdf
doc01835220210126193649.pdf
doc01835320210126193748.pdf
doc01835420210126193837.pdf
doc01835520210126193926.pdf
doc01835620210126194014.pdf
doc01836620210127145846.pdf
doc01845620210129105400.pdf
doc01848320210201113654.pdf
doc01848420210201114034.pdf
doc01848520210201142515.pdf
doc01849120210201180430.pdf
doc01853120210202174850.pdf
doc01857320210203132941.pdf
doc01857420210203133148.pdf
doc01861520210204155149.pdf
doc01867920210205104836.pdf
doc01868020210205105815.pdf
doc01868120210205111718.pdf
doc01869120210205164002.pdf
doc01869220210205164310.pdf
doc01869320210205165042.pdf
doc01869420210205165216.pdf
doc01869520210205165721.pdf
doc01869620210205170040.pdf
doc01884120210210165547.pdf
doc01884420210210175114.pdf
doc01884520210210175348.pdf
doc01887220210211121354.pdf
doc01892320210212115347.pdf
doc01895020210215154644.pdf
doc01895120210215155226.pdf
doc01902520210216172650.pdf
doc01911420210218153101.pdf
doc01913520210218165107.pdf
doc01913620210218165736.pdf
doc01913720210219105824.pdf
doc01914020210219112224.pdf
doc01914120210219113553.pdf
doc01914220210219114023.pdf
doc01916320210222115955.pdf
doc01916420210222120608.pdf
doc01916520210222120722.pdf
doc01916820210222122317.pdf
doc01917020210222125117.pdf
doc01917120210222125359.pdf
doc01917220210222125605.pdf
doc01917320210222130226.pdf
doc01917420210222130355.pdf
doc01917720210222131801.pdf
doc01917820210222132446.pdf
doc01925020210223183806.pdf
doc01925120210223184025.pdf
doc01925920210224182031.pdf
doc01931720210301153023.pdf
doc01931820210301153246.pdf
doc01931920210301153717.pdf
doc01932020210301154033.pdf
doc01932120210301154254.pdf
doc01942220210304105915.pdf
doc01942320210304110829.pdf
doc01943920210304154354.pdf
doc01946420210308120530.pdf
doc01946520210308120729.pdf
doc01946620210308121331.pdf
doc01946720210308121836.pdf
doc01946820210308123257.pdf
doc01946920210308125646.pdf
doc01947020210308131552.pdf
doc01956120210309201607.pdf
doc01956220210309201805.pdf
doc01956320210309202521.pdf
doc01956420210309202823.pdf
doc01956520210309203256.pdf
doc01965120210311152513.pdf
doc01965420210311153003.pdf
doc01965620210311153318.pdf
doc01969720210312154203.pdf
doc01969820210312154324.pdf
doc01970020210312160933.pdf
doc01970120210312161331.pdf
doc01970520210315105342.pdf
doc01970620210315105806.pdf
doc01970720210315110006.pdf
doc01972320210315155240.pdf
doc01972920210315161815.pdf
doc01974720210316122528.pdf
doc01974920210316122923.pdf
doc01996620210323142901.pdf
doc01996720210323143452.pdf
doc02004820210324150329.pdf
doc02022920210329164825.pdf
doc02023020210329175617.pdf
doc02023120210329180104.pdf
doc02023220210329180334.pdf
doc02031520210406102657.pdf
doc02031620210406103031.pdf
doc02031720210406103321.pdf
doc02031820210406103713.pdf
doc02031920210406104016.pdf
doc02032120210406111221.pdf
doc02032220210406111456.pdf
doc02032320210406111954.pdf
doc02032420210406112413.pdf
doc02032520210406113127.pdf
doc02032620210406113256.pdf
doc02032720210406113725.pdf
doc02032820210406113831.pdf
doc02032920210406114340.pdf
doc02033020210406114521.pdf
doc02033120210406114839.pdf
doc02033220210406115034.pdf
doc02047720210407165519.pdf
doc02052520210409093330.pdf
doc02053420210409160629.pdf
doc02054220210412170441.pdf
doc02058420210413145435.pdf
doc02058520210413150149.pdf
doc02058620210413150410.pdf
doc02058720210413150534.pdf
doc02058820210413150814.pdf
doc02059020210413152437.pdf
doc02059120210413152825.pdf
doc02061320210414095428.pdf
doc02061420210414100131.pdf
doc02064420210414180848.pdf
doc02069720210415184722.pdf
doc02069820210415184953.pdf
doc02069920210415185127.pdf
doc02073420210416155222.pdf
doc02073520210416155339.pdf
doc02074520210419144234.pdf
doc02074820210419151303.pdf
doc02074920210419151558.pdf
doc02086520210421143758.pdf
doc02086620210421144316.pdf
doc02086720210421144952.pdf
doc02087520210421173111.pdf
doc02090120210423110012.pdf
doc02090220210423110452.pdf
doc02096320210427102919.pdf
doc02096720210427120607.pdf
doc02101320210428122151.pdf
doc02101420210428122351.pdf
doc02101520210428123739.pdf
doc02101620210428124924.pdf
doc02101720210428125109.pdf
doc02101820210428125829.pdf
doc02101920210428130549.pdf
doc02102020210428131623.pdf
doc02102120210428132110.pdf
doc02102520210428161225.pdf
doc02104520210429114634.pdf
doc02104620210429114859.pdf
doc02112020210510101601.pdf
doc02121120210511162416.pdf
doc02121220210511162846.pdf
doc02121320210511163656.pdf
doc02121420210511164223.pdf
doc02121520210511164328.pdf
doc02121720210511174614.pdf
doc02121820210511174753.pdf
doc02121920210511175134.pdf
doc02122020210511175320.pdf
doc02122120210511175440.pdf
doc02122220210511180053.pdf
doc02123420210512093936.pdf
doc02123620210512100011.pdf
doc02123820210512100744.pdf
doc02124120210512101542.pdf
doc02129920210513131106.pdf
doc02135820210514095857.pdf
doc02135920210514100645.pdf
doc02136020210514101616.pdf
doc02146620210517175918.pdf
doc02152620210519143946.pdf
doc02161920210524160219.pdf
doc02162020210524160456.pdf
doc02163820210525163056.pdf
doc02167720210526121437.pdf
doc02167820210526121949.pdf
doc02168120210526123417.pdf
doc02168320210526123937.pdf
doc02168420210526124105.pdf
doc02170620210526155117.pdf
doc02170720210526160019.pdf
doc02170820210526160512.pdf
doc02179920210528121314.pdf
doc02180020210528122613.pdf
doc02180120210528123114.pdf
doc02180220210528123953.pdf
doc02182020210602100714.pdf
doc02182320210602111517.pdf
doc02182420210602111951.pdf
doc02192520210603171019.pdf
doc02192620210603171900.pdf
doc02194820210604155232.pdf
doc02200220210608141749.pdf
doc02200320210608142435.pdf
doc02200420210608142744.pdf
doc02211820210610154258.pdf
doc02211920210610154424.pdf
doc02212020210610154649.pdf
doc02213920210611122359.pdf
doc02216620210614161945.pdf
doc02216720210614162403.pdf
doc02219120210615120645.pdf
doc02219320210615124816.pdf
doc02219420210615130510.pdf
doc02219520210615134817.pdf
doc02219620210615135128.pdf
doc02219720210615135301.pdf
doc02219820210615135728.pdf
doc02219920210615135942.pdf
doc02220020210615140226.pdf
doc02220120210615140419.pdf
doc02220320210615142353.pdf
doc02220420210615142542.pdf
doc02220520210615143100.pdf
doc02220620210615143313.pdf
doc02220820210615144559.pdf
doc02221720210615151131.pdf
doc02221820210615151824.pdf
doc02221920210615152216.pdf
doc02222020210615152529.pdf
doc02222120210615152928.pdf
doc02222220210615153405.pdf
doc02222320210615153557.pdf
doc02222520210615154059.pdf
doc02222620210615154220.pdf
0062_210617090207_001.pdf
doc02232120210618113039.pdf
doc02232220210618113340.pdf
doc02236420210622113326.pdf
doc02249820210624190712.pdf
0063_210628090253_001.pdf
0064_210628090922_001.pdf
0070_210630095951_001.pdf
0071_210630100251_001.pdf
0072_210630100652_001.pdf
0074_210630101219_001.pdf
0075_210630101545_001.pdf
0076_210630102143_001.pdf
0077_210630102432_001.pdf
doc02260020210630151513.pdf
doc02260420210701093406.pdf
doc02260520210701093657.pdf
0078_210701082849_001.pdf
0079_210701083600_001.pdf
0080_210701124159_001.pdf
doc02268220210705113141.pdf
0084_210708085126_001.pdf
0085_210708090023_001.pdf
0086_210708091755_001.pdf
0088_210712063308_001.pdf
0089_210712063616_001.pdf
0090_210712063914_001.pdf
0091_210713094024_001.pdf
0092_210713100812_001.pdf
0093_210713101455_001.pdf
0094_210713101703_001.pdf
0095_210713101729_001.pdf
doc02293520210713144706.pdf
doc02293720210713145122.pdf
doc02293820210713145448.pdf
doc02293920210713145546.pdf
doc02293620210713144719.pdf
doc02294020210713155825.pdf
0096_210719114350_001.pdf
0097_210719114537_001.pdf
0098_210719115458_001.pdf
0099_210719115646_001.pdf
0102_210720104816_001.pdf
0100_210720104230_001.pdf
0101_210720104627_001.pdf
0103_210726134123_001.pdf
0104_210726134450_001.pdf
0105_210726134749_001.pdf
0106_210727131409_001.pdf
0107_210727131433_001.pdf
0108_210729220009_001.pdf
0109_210729220743_001.pdf
0110_210729220804_001.pdf
0111_210729221055_001.pdf
0112_210729221120_001.pdf
0113_210729221620_001.pdf
0114_210729221639_001.pdf
0115_210729222143_001.pdf
0116_210729222202_001.pdf
0117_210729222643_001.pdf
0118_210729222706_001.pdf
0119_210729223103_001.pdf
0120_210729223122_001.pdf
0121_210729223632_001.pdf
0122_210729223653_001.pdf
0123_210729224132_001.pdf
0124_210729224150_001.pdf
0125_210729224600_001.pdf
0126_210729224623_001.pdf
0127_210803090219_001.pdf
0128_210804071318_001.pdf
0129_210804071334_001.pdf
0130_210804094458_001.pdf
0131_210804094529_001.pdf
0133_210806113113_001.pdf
252.pdf
0134_210806114746_001.pdf
0135_210806114841_001.pdf
0136_210806115145_001.pdf
0137_210806115306_001.pdf
0138_210812085208_001.pdf
0139_210812085359_001.pdf
0140_210812085602_001.pdf
0141_210812085733_001.pdf
0142_210812090032_001.pdf
0143_210812090320_001.pdf
0144_210812090645_001.pdf
0145_210817094229_001.pdf
0146_210817094726_001.pdf
0147_210817095042_001.pdf
0148_210817095100_001.pdf
0149_210817095354_001.pdf
0150_210817095405_001.pdf
0151_210817100550_001.pdf
0152_210817100606_001.pdf
0153_210817100621_001.pdf
doc02389520210823165608.pdf
doc02389620210823165816.pdf
doc02389720210823170157.pdf
doc02389820210823170536.pdf
doc02390520210824115724.pdf
doc02391620210824155432.pdf
doc02391720210824160224.pdf
doc02392520210825105720.pdf
doc02392620210825110242.pdf
doc02393020210825111601.pdf
doc02393120210825112353.pdf
doc02393220210825113830.pdf
doc02402620210830164055.pdf
doc02403620210831135157.pdf
doc02403720210831135358.pdf
doc02409020210901103116.pdf
doc02410520210901124143.pdf
doc02418820210902145329.pdf
doc02418920210902145548.pdf
doc02419020210902145824.pdf
doc02419120210902150055.pdf
doc02419220210902150546.pdf
doc02419320210902150755.pdf
doc02419420210902153837.pdf
doc02419520210902154009.pdf
doc02417720210902123719.pdf
doc02419620210902154645.pdf
doc02424020210903124517.pdf
doc02424720210903125731.pdf
0154_210913081857_001.pdf
0155_210913082229_001.pdf
0156_210913082617_001.pdf
0157_210913082907_001.pdf
0158_210913083049_001.pdf
0159_210913083429_001.pdf
0160_210913083635_001.pdf
0161_210913083817_001.pdf
0162_210913083923_001.pdf
0163_210913084104_001.pdf
0165_210913145938_001.pdf
0164_210913144617_001.pdf
0166_210913150656_001.pdf
0168_210914101324_001.pdf
0169_210917105319_001.pdf
0170_210917120634_001.pdf
0171_210917120647_001.pdf
0172_210917121240_001.pdf
0173_210917121451_001.pdf
0174_210927085346_001.pdf
0175_210927085858_001.pdf
0176_210927090658_001.pdf
0177_210927091258_001.pdf
0178_210927091907_001.pdf
0179_210927092109_001.pdf
0180_210927102041_001.pdf
0181_210928091445_001.pdf
0183_210929080750_001.pdf
0184_210929082253_001.pdf
0185_210929082817_001.pdf
0187_210929084256_001.pdf
0188_210929084710_001.pdf
0189_210929085051_001.pdf
0190_211001103947_001.pdf
0192_211004090635_001.pdf
0196_211004093620_001.pdf
0197_211004094042_001.pdf
0198_211004094552_001.pdf
0199_211004095119_001.pdf
0200_211004095352_001.pdf
0201_211004095557_001.pdf
0202_211004095753_001.pdf
0203_211004095909_001.pdf
0204_211005124442_001.pdf
0205_211005130158_001.pdf
0206_211005130504_001.pdf
0207_211005131116_001.pdf
0208_211005131534_001.pdf
0209_211005131710_001.pdf
0210_211005131823_001.pdf
0211_211005132052_001.pdf
0212_211005132257_001.pdf
0213_211005132735_001.pdf
0214_211005133145_001.pdf
0216_211006084831_001.pdf
0217_211006085015_001.pdf
0215_211006084636_001.pdf
0223_211007094047_001.pdf
0224_211007094300_001.pdf
0225_211007094726_001.pdf
0226_211007111053_001.pdf
0227_211012110428_001.pdf
0228_211012111459_001.pdf
0229_211012111645_001.pdf
0230_211012111845_001.pdf
0231_211012112046_001.pdf
0232_211012112208_001.pdf
0233_211012113335_001.pdf
0234_211012114119_001.pdf
0235_211012114653_001.pdf
0236_211012114900_001.pdf
0237_211012115255_001.pdf
0238_211012115451_001.pdf
0239_211012115855_001.pdf
0240_211012120015_001.pdf
0241_211012120353_001.pdf
0242_211012121307_001.pdf
0243_211012121647_001.pdf
0244_211012121815_001.pdf
0245_211012122137_001.pdf
0246_211012122257_001.pdf
0247_211013085715_001.pdf
0248_211013085841_001.pdf
0249_211013090101_001.pdf
0250_211013090418_001.pdf
0251_211013090625_001.pdf
0253_211015122227_001.pdf
0254_211015122407_001.pdf
0256_211015125608_001.pdf
doc02588120211020140443.pdf
doc02588320211020141828.pdf
doc02588420211020150228.pdf
doc02588520211020151134.pdf
doc02588620211020152305.pdf
doc02588720211020152721.pdf
doc02588820211020152930.pdf
doc02592620211022104740.pdf
doc02593920211022133110.pdf
doc02594920211025115456.pdf
doc02595020211025115736.pdf
doc02595220211025124613.pdf
doc02595320211025124808.pdf
doc02595420211025125121.pdf
doc02595620211025125419.pdf
doc02595720211025125729.pdf
doc02595820211025125836.pdf
doc02595920211025130258.pdf
doc02596020211025130403.pdf
doc02596120211025130724.pdf
doc02596220211025130858.pdf
doc02596320211025131305.pdf
doc02596420211025132053.pdf
doc02596520211025132334.pdf
doc02596620211025132458.pdf
doc02596720211025133018.pdf
doc02596820211025133130.pdf
doc02600020211025153651.pdf
doc02608020211026142845.pdf
doc02608120211026143128.pdf
doc02608520211026161546.pdf
doc02608620211026162236.pdf
0259_211102104849_001.pdf
0260_211102105400_001.pdf
0261_211102105548_001.pdf
0262_211102105717_001.pdf
0263_211102110400_001.pdf
0264_211103103603_001.pdf
0265_211103104037_001.pdf
0266_211103110112_001.pdf
0267_211103110431_001.pdf
0268_211104102521_001.pdf
doc02630320211105123924.pdf
doc02630620211105125407.pdf
0269_211108094932_001.pdf
0270_211108095536_001.pdf
0271_211108095704_001.pdf
0272_211108095931_001.pdf
0273_211108100120_001.pdf
0274_211108100239_001.pdf
0275_211110092947_001.pdf
0276_211110093006_001.pdf
0277_211110093443_001.pdf
0278_211110093501_001.pdf
0279_211110093751_001.pdf
0280_211110093809_001.pdf
0281_211110094343_001.pdf
0282_211110094359_001.pdf
0283_211110094702_001.pdf
0284_211110094718_001.pdf
0285_211110094931_001.pdf
0286_211110094948_001.pdf
0287_211110100145_001.pdf
0288_211110100202_001.pdf
0289_211110100356_001.pdf
0290_211110100413_001.pdf
0291_211110100734_001.pdf
0292_211110100751_001.pdf
0293_211110101050_001.pdf
0294_211110101106_001.pdf
0295_211110101335_001.pdf
0296_211110101352_001.pdf
0297_211110112753_001.pdf
0298_211110114319_001.pdf
0299_211110114729_001.pdf
0300_211110115024_001.pdf
0304_211111102426_001.pdf
0305_211111102633_001.pdf
0306_211111102832_001.pdf
0307_211111142146_001.pdf
0308_211111142547_001.pdf
0309_211111142825_001.pdf
0310_211111151318_001.pdf
0315_211118105056_001.pdf
0316_211118105627_001.pdf
0317_211118105822_001.pdf
0318_211118110028_001.pdf
0319_211118110248_001.pdf
0320_211118110512_001.pdf
0321_211118110706_001.pdf
0322_211118110936_001.pdf
0323_211118122628_001.pdf
0324_211119084617_001.pdf
0325_211119084743_001.pdf
0326_211119085422_001.pdf
0327_211119085553_001.pdf
0333_211123101624_001.pdf
0334_211123101935_001.pdf
0337_211125105956_001.pdf
0338_211125110924_001.pdf
0339_211125111045_001.pdf
0340_211125111359_001.pdf
0341_211125111522_001.pdf
0342_211125111812_001.pdf
0343_211125111945_001.pdf
0344_211125112108_001.pdf
0345_211125112228_001.pdf
0346_211125112612_001.pdf
0347_211125112725_001.pdf
0348_211125113039_001.pdf
0349_211125113213_001.pdf
0350_211125113604_001.pdf
0351_211125113708_001.pdf
0352_211125113817_001.pdf
0353_211125113950_001.pdf
0354_211125114141_001.pdf
0355_211125114309_001.pdf
0356_211125114429_001.pdf
0357_211125114618_001.pdf
0358_211125114759_001.pdf
0359_211125114918_001.pdf
0360_211125115042_001.pdf
0361_211125115718_001.pdf
0362_211203090013_001.pdf
0363_211203090223_001.pdf
0364_211203090358_001.pdf
0365_211203090551_001.pdf
0366_211203093504_001.pdf
0367_211203094051_001.pdf
0368_211203094259_001.pdf
0369_211203094443_001.pdf
0370_211203094703_001.pdf
0371_211203094833_001.pdf
0372_211208103951_001.pdf
0373_211208104210_001.pdf
0374_211208104337_001.pdf
0375_211208104612_001.pdf
0376_211208104709_001.pdf
0377_211208104958_001.pdf
0379_211214120458_001.pdf
0380_211214120824_001.pdf
0381_211214121046_001.pdf
0382_211214121510_001.pdf
0383_211214121652_001.pdf
0384_211214121950_001.pdf
0385_211214122112_001.pdf
0386_211214122346_001.pdf
0387_211214122513_001.pdf
0388_211223094520_001.pdf
0389_211223095641_001.pdf
0390_211223095827_001.pdf
0391_211223101931_001.pdf
0392_211223102132_001.pdf
0393_211223104707_001.pdf
0394_211223104824_001.pdf
0395_211223105052_001.pdf
0396_211223105331_001.pdf
0397_211223105454_001.pdf
0398_211223105630_001.pdf
0399_211223110257_001.pdf
0400_211223110611_001.pdf
0401_211223110925_001.pdf
0402_211223111434_001.pdf
0403_211223111622_001.pdf
doc02169520211224095229.pdf
0404_211228123133_001.pdf
0405_211228123435_001.pdf
0406_211228123800_001.pdf
0407_211228124109_001.pdf
0408_211228124305_001.pdf
0409_211228124627_001.pdf
0410_211228124758_001.pdf
0411_211228133659_001.pdf
0412_211228133821_001.pdf
0413_211228134124_001.pdf
0414_211228134247_001.pdf
0415_211228134652_001.pdf
0416_211228134842_001.pdf
0417_211228135141_001.pdf
0418_211228135305_001.pdf
0419_211228135636_001.pdf
0420_211228135850_001.pdf
0421_211228140136_001.pdf
0422_211228140304_001.pdf
0423_211228140702_001.pdf
0424_211228140822_001.pdf
0425_211228141209_001.pdf
0426_211228141320_001.pdf
0427_220104105848_001.pdf
0428_220104110010_001.pdf
0429_220104110300_001.pdf
0430_220104110316_001.pdf
0431_220104110812_001.pdf
0432_220104110926_001.pdf
0433_220104111110_001.pdf
0434_220104111227_001.pdf
0435_220104111442_001.pdf
0436_220104111552_001.pdf
0437_220110110253_001.pdf
0438_220110110446_001.pdf
0439_220110110734_001.pdf
0440_220110111117_001.pdf
0441_220110111512_001.pdf
0442_220110111716_001.pdf
0443_220110111916_001.pdf
0444_220110112153_001.pdf
0445_220110112452_001.pdf
0446_220110112656_001.pdf
0447_220110112836_001.pdf
0448_220110113026_001.pdf
0449_220110113305_001.pdf
0450_220110113559_001.pdf
0451_220110114222_001.pdf
0452_220110115112_001.pdf
0453_220110115318_001.pdf
0454_220110115501_001.pdf
0455_220110115624_001.pdf
0456_220110115955_001.pdf
0457_220110120554_001.pdf
0458_220110120756_001.pdf
0459_220110121000_001.pdf
0460_220110121150_001.pdf
0461_220110121337_001.pdf
0462_220110121518_001.pdf
0463_220110121630_001.pdf
0464_220110121917_001.pdf
0465_220110122119_001.pdf
0466_220110122456_001.pdf
0467_220110123140_001.pdf
0468_220110124009_001.pdf
0469_220110124303_001.pdf
0470_220110124449_001.pdf
0471_220110124546_001.pdf
0472_220110124829_001.pdf
0473_220110125139_001.pdf
0474_220110125511_001.pdf
0475_220110125641_001.pdf
0476_220110125822_001.pdf
0477_220110125954_001.pdf
0478_220110130154_001.pdf
0479_220110130320_001.pdf
0480_220111100156_001.pdf
0481_220111100345_001.pdf
0482_220111100525_001.pdf
0483_220111100751_001.pdf
0484_220111100921_001.pdf
0485_220111101028_001.pdf
0486_220111101152_001.pdf
0487_220111101323_001.pdf
0488_220111101423_001.pdf
0489_220112085610_001.pdf
0490_220112085909_001.pdf
0491_220112090128_001.pdf
0492_220112090258_001.pdf
0493_220112090438_001.pdf
0494_220112090556_001.pdf
0495_220112090716_001.pdf
0496_220112090946_001.pdf
0497_220112091151_001.pdf
0498_220112091348_001.pdf
0499_220112092948_001.pdf
0500_220112093216_001.pdf
0501_220112093348_001.pdf
0502_220112093549_001.pdf
0503_220112094822_001.pdf
0504_220112094925_001.pdf
0505_220112095021_001.pdf
0506_220112095121_001.pdf
0507_220112095219_001.pdf
0508_220112095401_001.pdf
0509_220112100839_001.pdf
0510_220112101050_001.pdf
0511_220112101356_001.pdf
0512_220112101520_001.pdf
0513_220112101645_001.pdf
0514_220112101750_001.pdf
0515_220112101907_001.pdf
0516_220112102016_001.pdf
0517_220112102110_001.pdf
0518_220112102227_001.pdf
0519_220112102331_001.pdf
0520_220112102425_001.pdf
0521_220112102525_001.pdf
0522_220112102623_001.pdf
0523_220112102717_001.pdf
0524_220112102824_001.pdf
0525_220112102944_001.pdf
0526_220112103039_001.pdf
0527_220112103131_001.pdf
0528_220112103222_001.pdf
0529_220112103926_001.pdf
0530_220112104024_001.pdf
0531_220112104146_001.pdf
0532_220112104254_001.pdf
0533_220112104342_001.pdf
0534_220112104514_001.pdf
0535_220112104629_001.pdf
0536_220112104745_001.pdf
0537_220112104847_001.pdf
0538_220112105024_001.pdf
0539_220112105119_001.pdf
0540_220112105235_001.pdf
0541_220112105339_001.pdf
0542_220112105444_001.pdf
0543_220112105546_001.pdf
0544_220112105640_001.pdf
0545_220112105743_001.pdf
0546_220112105837_001.pdf
0547_220112110804_001.pdf
0548_220112113824_001.pdf
0549_220112113916_001.pdf
0550_220112114017_001.pdf
0551_220112121203_001.pdf
0552_220112121250_001.pdf
0553_220112121540_001.pdf
0554_220112121637_001.pdf
0555_220112121726_001.pdf
0556_220112121820_001.pdf
0557_220112121903_001.pdf
0558_220112121946_001.pdf
0559_220112122032_001.pdf
0560_220112122155_001.pdf
0561_220112122242_001.pdf
0562_220112122334_001.pdf
0563_220112122419_001.pdf
0564_220112122459_001.pdf
0565_220112122556_001.pdf
0566_220112122706_001.pdf
0567_220112122806_001.pdf
0568_220112122900_001.pdf
0569_220112122958_001.pdf
0570_220112123041_001.pdf
0571_220112123137_001.pdf
0572_220112123233_001.pdf
0573_220112123325_001.pdf
0574_220112123424_001.pdf
0575_220112123513_001.pdf
0576_220112123554_001.pdf
0577_220112123634_001.pdf
0578_220112123717_001.pdf
0578_220112123717_001.pdf
0580_220112123928_001.pdf
0581_220112124005_001.pdf
0582_220112124106_001.pdf
0583_220112124202_001.pdf
0584_220112124307_001.pdf
0585_220112124358_001.pdf
0586_220112124428_001.pdf
0587_220119155856_001.pdf
0588_220119160055_001.pdf
0589_220119160213_001.pdf
0590_220119160327_001.pdf
0591_220119160453_001.pdf
0592_220119160636_001.pdf
0593_220119160731_001.pdf
0594_220119161105_001.pdf
0595_220119161205_001.pdf
0596_220119161359_001.pdf
0597_220119161532_001.pdf
0598_220125141136_001.pdf
0599_220125141357_001.pdf
0600_220125141555_001.pdf
0601_220125141808_001.pdf
0602_220125142006_001.pdf
0603_220125142125_001.pdf
0604_220125142906_001.pdf
0605_220125143052_001.pdf
0606_220125143352_001.pdf
0607_220125143534_001.pdf
0608_220128103753_001.pdf
0609_220128104113_001.pdf
0610_220202121440_001.pdf
0611_220202121612_001.pdf
0612_220202121729_001.pdf
0613_220202122047_001.pdf
0614_220202122153_001.pdf
0615_220202122327_001.pdf
0616_220202122345_001.pdf
0617_220202122643_001.pdf
0618_220202122709_001.pdf
0619_220202123224_001.pdf
0620_220202123243_001.pdf
0621_220202123542_001.pdf
0622_220202123601_001.pdf
0623_220202123846_001.pdf
0624_220202123903_001.pdf
0625_220209114004_001.pdf
0626_220209114128_001.pdf
0628_220216074521_001.pdf
0629_220216074917_001.pdf
0630_220216075036_001.pdf
0631_220216075217_001.pdf
0632_220216075415_001.pdf
0633_220216075807_001.pdf
0634_220216080002_001.pdf
0635_220216080121_001.pdf
0636_220216080258_001.pdf
0637_220216080447_001.pdf
0639_220216080717_001.pdf
0640_220216080845_001.pdf
0641_220216081011_001.pdf
0642_220216081211_001.pdf
0643_220216081230_001.pdf
0644_220216081405_001.pdf
0645_220216081607_001.pdf
0646_220216081728_001.pdf
0647_220216081943_001.pdf
0648_220216082059_001.pdf
0649_220216082203_001.pdf
0650_220216082639_001.pdf
0651_220216082753_001.pdf
0652_220216083304_001.pdf
0653_220222075112_001.pdf
0654_220222075254_001.pdf
0655_220222075452_001.pdf
0656_220222075721_001.pdf
0657_220222080110_001.pdf
0658_220223073814_001.pdf
0659_220223074000_001.pdf
0660_220223074145_001.pdf
0661_220223074247_001.pdf
0662_220223075125_001.pdf
0664_220224093003_001.pdf
0665_220224093313_001.pdf
0668_220315094859_001.pdf
0669_220315100216_001.pdf
0670_220315100528_001.pdf
0671_220315100707_001.pdf
0672_220315101000_001.pdf
0673_220315101114_001.pdf
0674_220315101207_001.pdf
0675_220315101255_001.pdf
0676_220315101703_001.pdf
0677_220315101932_001.pdf
0678_220315102148_001.pdf
0679_220315102429_001.pdf
0680_220315102704_001.pdf
0681_220315102821_001.pdf
0682_220315102923_001.pdf
0683_220315103159_001.pdf
0684_220315103330_001.pdf
0685_220315103453_001.pdf
0686_220315103803_001.pdf
0687_220315104124_001.pdf
0688_220315104225_001.pdf
0689_220315104321_001.pdf
0690_220315104407_001.pdf
0691_220315104657_001.pdf
0692_220315104937_001.pdf
0693_220315105247_001.pdf
0694_220315105630_001.pdf
0695_220315110019_001.pdf
0696_220315110420_001.pdf
0698_220315111313_001.pdf
0699_220315111648_001.pdf
0700_220315112909_001.pdf
0701_220316103053_001.pdf
0702_220316103323_001.pdf
0703_220316103544_001.pdf
0704_220321092932_001.pdf
0705_220321093022_001.pdf
0706_220321093122_001.pdf
0707_220321093429_001.pdf
0708_220321093620_001.pdf
0709_220321093814_001.pdf
hotarare nr 11.pdf
proiect 11.pdf
DOC.pdf
DOC001.pdf
DOC002.pdf
DOC003.pdf
DOC004.pdf
DOC005.pdf
DOC006.pdf
DOC007.pdf
DOC008.pdf
DOC009.pdf
DOC010.pdf
DOC011.pdf
DOC012.pdf
DOC013.pdf
DOC014.pdf
DOC015.pdf
DOC016.pdf
DOC017.pdf
DOC.pdf
DOC000.pdf
DOC001.pdf
DOC002.pdf
DOC003.pdf
DOC004.pdf
DOC005.pdf
DOC006.pdf
DOC007.pdf
DOC008.pdf
DOC009.pdf
DOC010.pdf
DOC011.pdf
DOC012.pdf
DOC014.pdf
DOC015.pdf
DOC016.pdf
DOC017.pdf
DOC018.pdf
DOC019.pdf
DOC020.pdf
DOC021.pdf
DOC022.pdf
DOC023.pdf
DOC024.pdf
DOC025.pdf
DOC026.pdf
DOC027.pdf
DOC028.pdf
DOC029.pdf
DOC030.pdf
DOC031.pdf
DOC032.pdf
DOC035.pdf
DOC034.pdf
DOC036.pdf
DOC037.pdf
DOC038.pdf
DOC039.pdf
DOC040.pdf
DOC041.pdf
DOC042.pdf
DOC043.pdf
DOC044.pdf
DOC045.pdf
DOC046.pdf
DOC047.pdf
DOC048.pdf
DOC049.pdf
DOC050.pdf
DOC051.pdf
DOC052.pdf
DOC053.pdf
DOC054.pdf
DOC055.pdf
DOC056.pdf
DOC057.pdf
DOC058.pdf
DOC059.pdf
DOC060.pdf
DOC061.pdf
DOC062.pdf
DOC063.pdf
DOC064.pdf
DOC065.pdf
DOC066.pdf
DOC067.pdf
DOC068.pdf
DOC069.pdf
DOC070.pdf
DOC071.pdf
DOC072.pdf
DOC073.pdf
DOC074.pdf
DOC075.pdf
DOC076.pdf
DOC078.pdf
DOC079.pdf
DOC080.pdf
DOC081.pdf
DOC082.pdf
DOC083.pdf
DOC084.pdf
DOC085.pdf
DOC086.pdf
DOC087.pdf
DOC088.pdf
DOC089.pdf
DOC090.pdf
DOC091.pdf
DOC092.pdf
DOC093.pdf
DOC094.pdf
DOC095.pdf
DOC096.pdf
DOC097.pdf
DOC098.pdf
DOC099.pdf
DOC100.pdf
DOC101.pdf
DOC102.pdf
DOC103.pdf
DOC104.pdf
DOC105.pdf
DOC106.pdf
DOC107.pdf
DOC108.pdf
DOC109.pdf
DOC110.pdf
DOC111.pdf
DOC112.pdf
DOC113.pdf
DOC114.pdf
DOC115.pdf
DOC116.pdf
DOC117.pdf
DOC118.pdf
DOC119.pdf
DOC120.pdf
DOC121.pdf
DOC122.pdf
DOC123.pdf
DOC124.pdf
DOC125.pdf
DOC126.pdf
DOC127.pdf
DOC128.pdf
DOC129.pdf
DOC130.pdf
DOC131.pdf
DOC132.pdf
DOC133.pdf
DOC134.pdf
DOC135.pdf
DOC139.pdf
DOC140.pdf
DOC141.pdf
DOC142.pdf
DOC143.pdf
DOC144.pdf
DOC145.pdf
DOC146.pdf
DOC147.pdf
DOC148.pdf
DOC149.pdf
DOC150.pdf
DOC151.pdf
DOC152.pdf
DOC153.pdf
DOC154.pdf
DOC155.pdf
DOC156.pdf
DOC157.pdf
DOC158.pdf
DOC159.pdf
DOC160.pdf
DOC161.pdf
DOC162.pdf
DOC163.pdf
DOC164.pdf
DOC165.pdf
DOC166.pdf
DOC169.pdf
DOC170.pdf
DOC171.pdf
DOC172.pdf
DOC173.pdf
DOC174.pdf
DOC175.pdf
DOC176.pdf
DOC177.pdf
DOC178.pdf
DOC179.pdf
DOC180.pdf
DOC181.pdf
DOC182.pdf
DOC183.pdf
DOC184.pdf
DOC185.pdf
DOC186.pdf
DOC187.pdf
DOC188.pdf
DOC189.pdf
DOC190.pdf
DOC191.pdf
DOC192.pdf
DOC193.pdf
DOC194.pdf
DOC195.pdf
DOC196.pdf
DOC197.pdf
DOC198.pdf
DOC199.pdf
DOC200.pdf
DOC201.pdf
DOC203.pdf
DOC204.pdf
DOC205.pdf
DOC206.pdf
DOC207.pdf
DOC211.pdf
DOC212.pdf
DOC213.pdf
DOC215.pdf
DOC216.pdf
DOC217.pdf
DOC218.pdf
DOC219.pdf
DOC220.pdf
DOC221.pdf
DOC222.pdf
DOC223.pdf
DOC224.pdf
DOC225.pdf
DOC226.pdf
DOC227.pdf
DOC228.pdf
DOC230.pdf
DOC231.pdf
DOC232.pdf
DOC233.pdf
DOC234.pdf
DOC235.pdf
DOC236.pdf
DOC237.pdf
DOC238.pdf
DOC239.pdf
DOC243.pdf
DOC245.pdf
DOC246.pdf
DOC247.pdf
DOC248.pdf
DOC249.pdf
DOC250.pdf
DOC251.pdf
DOC252.pdf
DOC253.pdf
DOC254.pdf
DOC255.pdf
DOC256.pdf
DOC257.pdf
DOC258.pdf
DOC259.pdf
DOC267.pdf
DOC268.pdf
DOC269.pdf
DOC270.pdf
DOC271.pdf
DOC272.pdf
DOC273.pdf
DOC274.pdf
DOC275.pdf
DOC276.pdf
DOC277.pdf
DOC278.pdf
DOC279.pdf
DOC280.pdf
DOC281.pdf
DOC.pdf
DOC000.pdf
DOC001.pdf
DOC002.pdf
DOC003.pdf
DOC004.pdf
DOC005.pdf
DOC006.pdf
DOC007.pdf
DOC008.pdf
DOC009.pdf
DOC010.pdf
DOC011.pdf
DOC012.pdf
DOC013.pdf
DOC014.pdf
DOC015.pdf
DOC016.pdf
DOC017.pdf
DOC018.pdf
DOC019.pdf
DOC020.pdf
DOC021.pdf
DOC022.pdf
DOC023.pdf
DOC024.pdf
DOC025.pdf
DOC026.pdf
DOC027.pdf
DOC028.pdf
DOC029.pdf
DOC030.pdf
DOC031.pdf
DOC032.pdf
DOC033.pdf
DOC034.pdf
DOC035.pdf
DOC036.pdf
DOC037.pdf
DOC038.pdf
DOC039.pdf
DOC040.pdf
DOC041.pdf
DOC042.pdf
DOC043.pdf
DOC044.pdf
DOC045.pdf
DOC046.pdf
DOC047.pdf
DOC048.pdf
DOC049.pdf
DOC050.pdf
DOC051.pdf
DOC052.pdf
DOC053.pdf
DOC054.pdf
DOC055.pdf
DOC056.pdf
DOC057.pdf
DOC058.pdf
DOC059.pdf
DOC060.pdf
DOC061.pdf
DOC062.pdf
DOC063.pdf
DOC064.pdf
DOC065.pdf
DOC066.pdf
DOC067.pdf
DOC068.pdf
DOC069.pdf
DOC070.pdf
DOC071.pdf
DOC072.pdf
DOC073.pdf
DOC074.pdf
DOC075.pdf
DOC076.pdf
DOC077.pdf
DOC078.pdf
DOC079.pdf
DOC080.pdf
DOC081.pdf
DOC082.pdf
DOC083.pdf
DOC084.pdf
DOC085.pdf
DOC090.pdf
DOC091.pdf
DOC092.pdf
DOC093.pdf
DOC094.pdf
DOC095.pdf
DOC096.pdf
DOC097.pdf
DOC098.pdf
DOC099.pdf
DOC100.pdf
DOC101.pdf
DOC102.pdf
DOC103.pdf
DOC104.pdf
DOC105.pdf
DOC106.pdf
DOC107.pdf
DOC108.pdf
DOC109.pdf
DOC110.pdf
DOC111.pdf
DOC112.pdf
DOC113.pdf
DOC114.pdf
DOC115.pdf
DOC116.pdf
DOC117.pdf
DOC119.pdf
DOC120.pdf
DOC121.pdf
DOC122.pdf
DOC123.pdf
DOC124.pdf
DOC125.pdf
DOC126.pdf
DOC127.pdf
DOC128.pdf
DOC129.pdf
DOC130.pdf
DOC131.pdf
DOC132.pdf
DOC133.pdf
DOC134.pdf
DOC135.pdf
DOC136.pdf
DOC137.pdf
DOC138.pdf
DOC139.pdf
DOC140.pdf
DOC141.pdf
DOC142.pdf
DOC143.pdf
DOC144.pdf
DOC145.pdf
DOC146.pdf
DOC147.pdf
DOC148.pdf
DOC150.pdf
DOC151.pdf
DOC152.pdf
DOC153.pdf
DOC154.pdf
DOC155.pdf
DOC156.pdf
DOC157.pdf
DOC158.pdf
DOC159.pdf
DOC160.pdf
DOC161.pdf
DOC162.pdf
DOC163.pdf
DOC164.pdf
DOC165.pdf
DOC166.pdf
DOC167.pdf
DOC168.pdf
DOC169.pdf
DOC170.pdf
DOC171.pdf
DOC174.pdf
DOC175.pdf
DOC176.pdf
DOC177.pdf
DOC178.pdf
DOC179.pdf
DOC180.pdf
DOC181.pdf
DOC182.pdf
DOC183.pdf
DOC184.pdf
DOC185.pdf
DOC186.pdf
DOC187.pdf
DOC188.pdf
DOC189.pdf
DOC190.pdf
DOC.pdf
DOC000.pdf
DOC001.pdf
DOC002.pdf
DOC003.pdf
DOC004.pdf
DOC005.pdf
DOC006.pdf
DOC007.pdf
DOC008.pdf
DOC009.pdf
DOC010.pdf
DOC011.pdf
DOC013.pdf
DOC014.pdf
DOC015.pdf
DOC016.pdf
DOC017.pdf
DOC018.pdf
DOC019.pdf
DOC020.pdf
DOC021.pdf
DOC022.pdf
DOC023.pdf
DOC024.pdf
DOC025.pdf
DOC026.pdf
DOC027.pdf
DOC028.pdf
DOC029.pdf
DOC030.pdf
DOC031.pdf
DOC032.pdf
DOC033.pdf
DOC034.pdf
DOC035.pdf
DOC036.pdf
DOC037.pdf
DOC038.pdf
DOC039.pdf
DOC040.pdf
DOC041.pdf
DOC042.pdf
DOC043.pdf
DOC044.pdf
DOC045.pdf
DOC046.pdf
DOC047.pdf
DOC048.pdf
DOC049.pdf
DOC050.pdf
DOC051.pdf
DOC052.pdf
DOC053.pdf
DOC054.pdf
DOC055.pdf
DOC056.pdf
DOC057.pdf
DOC058.pdf
DOC059.pdf
DOC060.pdf
DOC061.pdf
DOC062.pdf
DOC063.pdf
DOC064.pdf
DOC065.pdf
DOC066.pdf
DOC067.pdf
DOC068.pdf
DOC069.pdf
DOC070.pdf
DOC071.pdf
DOC072.pdf
DOC073.pdf
DOC074.pdf
DOC075.pdf
DOC076.pdf
DOC077.pdf
DOC078.pdf
DOC079.pdf
DOC080.pdf
DOC081.pdf
DOC082.pdf
DOC083.pdf
DOC084.pdf
DOC085.pdf
DOC086.pdf
DOC087.pdf
DOC088.pdf
DOC090.pdf
DOC091.pdf
DOC093.pdf
DOC094.pdf
DOC095.pdf
DOC096.pdf
DOC097.pdf
DOC098.pdf
DOC099.pdf
DOC100.pdf
DOC101.pdf
DOC102.pdf
DOC103.pdf
DOC104.pdf
DOC105.pdf
DOC106.pdf
DOC107.pdf
DOC108.pdf
DOC109.pdf
DOC110.pdf
DOC111.pdf
DOC112.pdf
DOC113.pdf
DOC114.pdf
DOC115.pdf
DOC116.pdf
DOC117.pdf
DOC118.pdf
DOC119.pdf
DOC120.pdf
DOC121.pdf
DOC122.pdf
DOC123.pdf
DOC124.pdf
DOC125.pdf
DOC126.pdf
DOC127.pdf
DOC128.pdf
DOC129.pdf
DOC130.pdf
DOC131.pdf
DOC132.pdf
DOC133.pdf
DOC134.pdf
DOC135.pdf
DOC136.pdf
DOC137.pdf
DOC138.pdf
DOC139.pdf
DOC140.pdf
DOC141.pdf
DOC142.pdf
DOC143.pdf
DOC144.pdf
DOC145.pdf
DOC146.pdf
DOC147.pdf
DOC148.pdf
DOC149.pdf
DOC150.pdf
DOC151.pdf
DOC152.pdf
DOC153.pdf
DOC154.pdf
DOC155.pdf
DOC156.pdf
DOC157.pdf
DOC158.pdf
DOC159.pdf
DOC160.pdf
DOC161.pdf
DOC162.pdf
DOC163.pdf
DOC164.pdf
DOC165.pdf
DOC166.pdf
DOC167.pdf
DOC168.pdf
DOC169.pdf
DOC170.pdf
DOC171.pdf
DOC172.pdf
DOC173.pdf
DOC174.pdf
DOC175.pdf
DOC176.pdf
DOC177.pdf
DOC178.pdf
DOC179.pdf
DOC180.pdf
DOC181.pdf
DOC182.pdf
DOC183.pdf
DOC184.pdf
DOC185.pdf
DOC186.pdf
DOC189.pdf
DOC190.pdf
DOC191.pdf
DOC192.pdf
DOC193.pdf
DOC194.pdf
DOC195.pdf
DOC196.pdf
DOC197.pdf
DOC198.pdf
DOC199.pdf
DOC200.pdf
DOC201.pdf
DOC202.pdf
DOC203.pdf
DOC.pdf
DOC000.pdf
DOC001.pdf
DOC002.pdf
DOC003.pdf
DOC004.pdf
DOC005.pdf
DOC006.pdf
DOC007.pdf
DOC008.pdf
DOC009.pdf
DOC010.pdf
DOC011.pdf
DOC012.pdf
DOC013.pdf
DOC014.pdf
DOC015.pdf
DOC016.pdf
DOC017.pdf
DOC018.pdf
DOC019.pdf
DOC020.pdf
DOC021.pdf
DOC022.pdf
DOC023.pdf
DOC024.pdf
DOC025.pdf
DOC026.pdf
DOC027.pdf
DOC028.pdf
DOC029.pdf
DOC030.pdf
DOC033.pdf
DOC034.pdf
DOC035.pdf
DOC036.pdf
DOC037.pdf
DOC038.pdf
DOC039.pdf
DOC040.pdf
DOC041.pdf
DOC042.pdf
DOC043.pdf
DOC044.pdf
DOC045.pdf
DOC046.pdf
DOC047.pdf
DOC048.pdf
DOC049.pdf
DOC050.pdf
DOC051.pdf
DOC052.pdf
DOC053.pdf
DOC054.pdf
DOC055.pdf
DOC056.pdf
DOC057.pdf
DOC058.pdf
DOC059.pdf
DOC060.pdf
DOC061.pdf
DOC062.pdf
DOC063.pdf
DOC064.pdf
DOC065.pdf
DOC066.pdf
DOC067.pdf
DOC068.pdf
DOC069.pdf
DOC070.pdf
DOC071.pdf
DOC072.pdf
DOC073.pdf
DOC074.pdf
DOC075.pdf
DOC076.pdf
DOC077.pdf
DOC078.pdf
DOC079.pdf
DOC080.pdf
DOC081.pdf
DOC082.pdf
DOC083.pdf
DOC084.pdf
DOC085.pdf
DOC086.pdf
DOC087.pdf
DOC088.pdf
DOC089.pdf
DOC090.pdf
DOC091.pdf
DOC092.pdf
DOC093.pdf
DOC094.pdf
DOC095.pdf
DOC096.pdf
DOC097.pdf
DOC098.pdf
DOC099.pdf
DOC100.pdf
DOC101.pdf
DOC102.pdf
DOC103.pdf
DOC104.pdf
DOC105.pdf
DOC106.pdf
DOC107.pdf
DOC108.pdf
DOC109.pdf
DOC110.pdf
DOC111.pdf
DOC112.pdf
DOC113.pdf
DOC114.pdf
DOC115.pdf
DOC116.pdf
DOC117.pdf
DOC118.pdf
DOC119.pdf
DOC120.pdf
DOC121.pdf
DOC122.pdf
DOC123.pdf
DOC124.pdf
DOC125.pdf
DOC126.pdf
DOC127.pdf
DOC128.pdf
DOC129.pdf
DOC130.pdf
DOC131.pdf
DOC132.pdf
DOC133.pdf
DOC134.pdf
DOC135.pdf
DOC136.pdf
DOC137.pdf
DOC138.pdf
DOC139.pdf
DOC140.pdf
DOC141.pdf
planul achizitiilor publice.pdf
DOC143.pdf
DOC144.pdf
DOC145.pdf
DOC146.pdf
DOC147.pdf
DOC148.pdf
DOC149.pdf
DOC150.pdf
DOC151.pdf
DOC152.pdf
DOC153.pdf
DOC154.pdf
DOC155.pdf
DOC156.pdf
DOC157.pdf
DOC158.pdf
DOC159.pdf
DOC160.pdf
DOC161.pdf
DOC162.pdf
DOC163.pdf
DOC164.pdf
DOC165.pdf
DOC166.pdf
DOC167.pdf
DOC169.pdf
DOC171.pdf
DOC172.pdf
DOC173.pdf
DOC174.pdf
DOC175.pdf
DOC176.pdf
DOC177.pdf
DOC178.pdf
DOC179.pdf
DOC180.pdf
DOC181.pdf
DOC182.pdf
DOC183.pdf
DOC184.pdf
DOC185.pdf
DOC186.pdf
DOC187.pdf
DOC188.pdf
DOC189.pdf
DOC190.pdf
DOC191.pdf
DOC192.pdf
DOC193.pdf
DOC194.pdf
DOC195.pdf
DOC196.pdf
DOC197.pdf
DOC198.pdf
DOC199.pdf
DOC200.pdf
DOC201.pdf
DOC202.pdf
DOC203.pdf
DOC204.pdf
DOC205.pdf
DOC206.pdf
DOC207.pdf
DOC208.pdf
DOC209.pdf
anexe la HCL nr. 20 din 2023 111.pdf
DOC214.pdf
DOC215.pdf
DOC216.pdf
DOC217.pdf
DOC218.pdf
DOC219.pdf
DOC220.pdf
DOC221.pdf
DOC222.pdf
DOC223.pdf
DOC224.pdf
DOC225.pdf
DOC226.pdf
DOC228.pdf
DOC229.pdf
DOC230.pdf
doc05357720230405130505.pdf
DOC235.pdf
DOC236.pdf
DOC237.pdf
DOC238.pdf
DOC239.pdf
DOC240.pdf
DOC241.pdf
DOC242.pdf
DOC243.pdf
DOC244.pdf
DOC245.pdf
DOC246.pdf
DOC247.pdf
DOC248.pdf
DOC249.pdf
DOC250.pdf
DOC251.pdf
DOC252.pdf
DOC253.pdf
DOC255.pdf
DOC256.pdf
DOC257.pdf
DOC258.pdf
DOC259.pdf
DOC260.pdf
DOC261.pdf
DOC262.pdf
DOC264.pdf
DOC265.pdf
DOC266.pdf
DOC267.pdf
DOC268.pdf
DOC269.pdf
DOC270.pdf
DOC271.pdf
DOC272.pdf
DOC273.pdf
DOC274.pdf
DOC275.pdf
DOC276.pdf
DOC277.pdf
DOC278.pdf
DOC279.pdf
DOC280.pdf
DOC281.pdf
DOC282.pdf
DOC283.pdf
DOC284.pdf
DOC285.pdf
DOC286.pdf
DOC287.pdf
DOC288.pdf
DOC289.pdf
DOC290.pdf
DOC291.pdf
DOC292.pdf
DOC293.pdf
DOC294.pdf
DOC295.pdf
DOC296.pdf
DOC297.pdf
DOC298.pdf
DOC299.pdf
DOC300.pdf
DOC301.pdf
DOC302.pdf
DOC303.pdf
DOC304.pdf
DOC305.pdf
DOC306.pdf
DOC307.pdf
DOC308.pdf
DOC309.pdf
DOC310.pdf
DOC311.pdf
DOC312.pdf
DOC313.pdf
DOC314.pdf
DOC315.pdf
DOC316.pdf
DOC317.pdf
DOC318.pdf
DOC319.pdf
DOC320.pdf
DOC321.pdf
DOC322.pdf
DOC323.pdf
DOC324.pdf
DOC325.pdf
DOC326.pdf
DOC327.pdf
DOC328.pdf
DOC329.pdf
DOC330.pdf
DOC331.pdf
DOC332.pdf
DOC333.pdf
DOC334.pdf
DOC336.pdf
DOC337.pdf
DOC338.pdf
DOC339.pdf
DOC340.pdf
DOC341.pdf
DOC342.pdf
DOC343.pdf
DOC344.pdf
DOC345.pdf
DOC346.pdf
DOC347.pdf
DOC348.pdf
DOC349.pdf
DOC350.pdf
DOC351.pdf
DOC353.pdf
DOC354.pdf
DOC355.pdf
DOC356.pdf
DOC357.pdf
DOC358.pdf
DOC359.pdf
DOC360.pdf
DOC361.pdf
DOC362.pdf
DOC363.pdf
DOC364.pdf
DOC365.pdf
DOC366.pdf
DOC367.pdf
DOC368.pdf
DOC369.pdf
DOC370.pdf
DOC371.pdf
DOC372.pdf
DOC373.pdf
DOC374.pdf
DOC375.pdf
DOC376.pdf
DOC377.pdf
DOC378.pdf
DOC379.pdf
DOC380.pdf
DOC381.pdf
DOC382.pdf
DOC384.pdf
DOC385.pdf
DOC386.pdf
DOC387.pdf
DOC388.pdf
DOC389.pdf
DOC390.pdf
DOC391.pdf
DOC392.pdf
DOC393.pdf
DOC394.pdf
DOC395.pdf
DOC396.pdf
DOC398.pdf
DOC399.pdf
DOC403.pdf
DOC397.pdf
DOC404.pdf
DOC405.pdf
DOC407.pdf
DOC408.pdf
DOC409.pdf
DOC410.pdf
DOC411.pdf
DOC412.pdf
DOC413.pdf
DOC414.pdf
DOC415.pdf
DOC416.pdf
DOC417.pdf
DOC418.pdf
DOC419.pdf
DOC420.pdf
DOC421.pdf
DOC422.pdf
DOC423.pdf
DOC424.pdf
DOC425.pdf
DOC426.pdf
DOC427.pdf
DOC428.pdf
DOC429.pdf
DOC430.pdf
DOC431.pdf
DOC432.pdf
DOC433.pdf
DOC434.pdf
DOC435.pdf
DOC436.pdf
DOC437.pdf
DOC438.pdf
DOC439.pdf
DOC440.pdf
DOC441.pdf
DOC442.pdf
DOC443.pdf
DOC444.pdf
DOC447.pdf
DOC406.pdf
DOC448.pdf
DOC449.pdf
DOC450.pdf
DOC451.pdf
DOC452.pdf
DOC453.pdf
DOC454.pdf
DOC455.pdf
DOC456.pdf
DOC457.pdf
DOC458.pdf
Dispozitie REG GDPR Jilava SITE.pdf
DOC459.pdf
DOC460.pdf
DOC461.pdf
DOC462.pdf
DOC463.pdf
DOC464.pdf
DOC465.pdf
DOC466.pdf
DOC467.pdf
DOC468.pdf
DOC469.pdf
DOC470.pdf
DOC471.pdf
DOC472.pdf
DOC473.pdf
DOC474.pdf
DOC475.pdf
DOC476.pdf
DOC477.pdf
DOC478.pdf
DOC479.pdf
DOC480.pdf
DOC487.pdf
DOC488.pdf
DOC489.pdf
DOC490.pdf
DOC491.pdf
DOC492.pdf
DOC493.pdf
DOC494.pdf
DOC495.pdf
DOC496.pdf
DOC497.pdf
DOC498.pdf
DOC499.pdf
DOC500.pdf
DOC501.pdf
DOC502.pdf
DOC503.pdf
DOC504.pdf
DOC505.pdf
DOC506.pdf
DOC507.pdf
DOC508.pdf
DOC509.pdf
DOC510.pdf
DOC511.pdf
DOC512.pdf
DOC513.pdf
DOC514.pdf
DOC515.pdf
DOC516.pdf
DOC517.pdf
DOC518.pdf
DOC519.pdf
DOC520.pdf
DOC521.pdf
DOC522.pdf
DOC523.pdf
DOC524.pdf
DOC525.pdf
DOC526.pdf
DOC528.pdf
DOC529.pdf
DOC530.pdf
DOC531.pdf
DOC532.pdf
DOC533.pdf
DOC534.pdf
DOC535.pdf
DOC536.pdf
DOC537.pdf
DOC538.pdf
DOC539.pdf
DOC540.pdf
DOC541.pdf
DOC542.pdf
DOC543.pdf
DOC544.pdf
DOC545.pdf
DOC546.pdf
DOC547.pdf
DOC548.pdf
DOC549.pdf
DOC550.pdf
DOC.pdf
DOC000.pdf
DOC001.pdf
DOC002.pdf
DOC003.pdf
DOC004.pdf
DOC005.pdf
DOC006.pdf
DOC007.pdf
DOC008.pdf
DOC009.pdf
DOC010.pdf
DOC011.pdf
DOC012.pdf
DOC013.pdf
DOC014.pdf
DOC015.pdf
DOC016.pdf
DOC017.pdf
DOC018.pdf
DOC019.pdf
DOC020.pdf
DOC021.pdf
DOC022.pdf
DOC023.pdf
DOC024.pdf
DOC025.pdf
DOC026.pdf
DOC027.pdf
DOC028.pdf
DOC029.pdf
DOC030.pdf
DOC031.pdf
DOC032.pdf
DOC033.pdf
DOC034.pdf
DOC035.pdf
DOC036.pdf
DOC037.pdf
DOC038.pdf
DOC039.pdf
DOC040.pdf
DOC041.pdf
DOC042.pdf
DOC043.pdf
DOC044.pdf
DOC045.pdf
DOC046.pdf
DOC047.pdf
DOC048.pdf
DOC049.pdf
DOC050.pdf
DOC051.pdf
DOC052.pdf
DOC053.pdf
DOC054.pdf
DOC055.pdf
DOC056.pdf
DOC057.pdf
DOC058.pdf
DOC059.pdf
DOC060.pdf
DOC061.pdf
DOC062.pdf
DOC063.pdf
DOC064.pdf
DOC065.pdf
DOC066.pdf
DOC067.pdf
DOC068.pdf
DOC069.pdf
DOC070.pdf
DOC071.pdf
DOC072.pdf
DOC073.pdf
DOC074.pdf
DOC075.pdf
DOC076.pdf
DOC077.pdf
DOC078.pdf
DOC079.pdf
DOC080.pdf
DOC081.pdf
DOC082.pdf
DOC083.pdf
DOC084.pdf
DOC085.pdf
DOC086.pdf
DOC087.pdf
DOC088.pdf
DOC089.pdf
DOC090.pdf
DOC091.pdf
DOC092.pdf
DOC093.pdf
DOC094.pdf
DOC095.pdf
DOC096.pdf
DOC097.pdf
DOC098.pdf
DOC099.pdf
DOC100.pdf
DOC101.pdf
DOC102.pdf
DOC103.pdf
DOC104.pdf
DOC105.pdf
DOC106.pdf
DOC107.pdf
DOC108.pdf
DOC109.pdf
DOC110.pdf
DOC111.pdf
DOC112.pdf
DOC113.pdf
DOC114.pdf
DOC115.pdf
DOC116.pdf
DOC117.pdf
DOC118.pdf
DOC119.pdf
DOC120.pdf
DOC121.pdf
DOC122.pdf
DOC123.pdf
DOC124.pdf
DOC125.pdf
DOC126.pdf
DOC127.pdf
DOC128.pdf
DOC129.pdf
DOC130.pdf
DOC131.pdf
DOC132.pdf
DOC133.pdf
DOC134.pdf
DOC135.pdf
DOC136.pdf
DOC137.pdf
DOC138.pdf
DOC139.pdf
DOC166.pdf
DOC167.pdf
DOC168.pdf
DOC169.pdf
DOC170.pdf
DOC171.pdf
DOC172.pdf
DOC173.pdf
DOC174.pdf
DOC175.pdf
DOC176.pdf
DOC177.pdf
DOC178.pdf
DOC179.pdf
DOC180.pdf
DOC181.pdf
DOC182.pdf
DOC183.pdf
DOC184.pdf
DOC185.pdf
DOC186.pdf
DOC187.pdf
DOC188.pdf
DOC189.pdf
DOC190.pdf
DOC191.pdf
DOC192.pdf
DOC193.pdf
DOC194.pdf
DOC195.pdf
DOC196.pdf
DOC197.pdf
DOC198.pdf
DOC199.pdf
DOC200.pdf
DOC201.pdf
DOC202.pdf
DOC203.pdf
DOC204.pdf
DOC205.pdf
DOC206.pdf
DOC207.pdf
DOC208.pdf
DOC209.pdf
DOC210.pdf
DOC211.pdf
DOC212.pdf
DOC213.pdf
DOC214.pdf
DOC215.pdf
DOC216.pdf
DOC218.pdf
DOC219.pdf
DOC220.pdf
DOC221.pdf
DOC222.pdf
DOC223.pdf
DOC224.pdf
DOC225.pdf
DOC226.pdf
DOC227.pdf
DOC228.pdf
DOC229.pdf
DOC230.pdf
DOC231.pdf
DOC232.pdf
DOC233.pdf
DOC234.pdf
DOC237.pdf
DOC238.pdf
DOC239.pdf
DOC240.pdf
DOC241.pdf
DOC242.pdf
DOC243.pdf
DOC244.pdf
DOC245.pdf
DOC246.pdf
DOC247.pdf
DOC248.pdf
DOC249.pdf
DOC250.pdf
DOC253.pdf
DOC254.pdf
DOC255.pdf
DOC256.pdf
DOC257.pdf
DOC258.pdf
DOC259.pdf
DOC260.pdf
DOC261.pdf
DOC262.pdf
DOC263.pdf
DOC264.pdf
DOC265.pdf
DOC266.pdf
DOC267.pdf
DOC268.pdf
DOC269.pdf
DOC270.pdf
DOC271.pdf
DOC272.pdf
DOC273.pdf
DOC274.pdf
DOC275.pdf
DOC276.pdf
DOC277.pdf
DOC278.pdf
DOC279.pdf
DOC280.pdf
DOC281.pdf
DOC282.pdf
DOC283.pdf
DOC284.pdf
DOC285.pdf
DOC286.pdf
DOC287.pdf
DOC288.pdf
DOC289.pdf
DOC290.pdf
DOC291.pdf
DOC292.pdf
DOC293.pdf
DOC294.pdf
DOC295.pdf
DOC296.pdf
DOC297.pdf
DOC298.pdf
DOC299.pdf
DOC300.pdf
DOC301.pdf
DOC302.pdf
DOC303.pdf
DOC304.pdf
DOC305.pdf
DOC306.pdf
DOC307.pdf
DOC308.pdf
DOC309.pdf
DOC310.pdf
DOC311.pdf
DOC312.pdf
DOC315.pdf
DOC316.pdf
DOC317.pdf
DOC318.pdf
DOC319.pdf
DOC320.pdf
DOC321.pdf
DOC322.pdf
DOC323.pdf
DOC324.pdf
DOC325.pdf
DOC326.pdf
DOC327.pdf
DOC328.pdf
DOC329.pdf
DOC330.pdf
DOC331.pdf
DOC332.pdf
DOC333.pdf
DOC334.pdf
DOC335.pdf
DOC336.pdf
DOC337.pdf
DOC338.pdf
DOC339.pdf
DOC340.pdf
DOC341.pdf
DOC342.pdf
DOC343.pdf
DOC344.pdf
DOC345.pdf
DOC346.pdf
DOC347.pdf
DOC348.pdf
DOC349.pdf
DOC350.pdf
DOC351.pdf
DOC352.pdf
DOC353.pdf
DOC354.pdf
DOC355.pdf
DOC356.pdf
DOC357.pdf
Proiect lista investiții buget 2024.pdf
Proiect buget 2024.pdf
DOC361.pdf
DOC362.pdf
DOC363.pdf
DOC364.pdf
DOC365.pdf
DOC366.pdf
DOC367.pdf
DOC368.pdf
DOC369.pdf
DOC370.pdf
DOC371.pdf
DOC372.pdf
DOC373.pdf
DOC374.pdf
DOC375.pdf
DOC376.pdf
DOC377.pdf
DOC378.pdf
DOC379.pdf
DOC380.pdf
DOC381.pdf
DOC382.pdf
DOC383.pdf
DOC384.pdf
DOC385.pdf
DOC386.pdf
DOC387.pdf
DOC388.pdf
DOC389.pdf
DOC390.pdf
DOC391.pdf
DOC392.pdf
DOC393.pdf
DOC394.pdf
DOC395.pdf
DOC396.pdf
DOC397.pdf
DOC398.pdf
DOC399.pdf
DOC400.pdf
DOC401.pdf
DOC402.pdf
DOC403.pdf
DOC404.pdf
DOC405.pdf
DOC406.pdf
DOC407.pdf
DOC408.pdf
DOC409.pdf
DOC410.pdf
DOC411.pdf
DOC412.pdf
DOC413.pdf
DOC414.pdf
DOC415.pdf
DOC416.pdf
DOC417.pdf
DOC418.pdf
DOC419.pdf
DOC420.pdf
DOC421.pdf
DOC422.pdf
DOC423.pdf
DOC424.pdf
DOC425.pdf
DOC426.pdf
DOC427.pdf
DOC428.pdf
DOC429.pdf
DOC430.pdf
DOC431.pdf
DOC432.pdf
DOC433.pdf
DOC434.pdf
DOC435.pdf
DOC436.pdf
DOC437.pdf
DOC438.pdf
DOC439.pdf
DOC440.pdf
DOC441.pdf
DOC442.pdf
DOC443.pdf
DOC444.pdf
DOC445.pdf
DOC446.pdf
DOC447.pdf
DOC449.pdf
DOC450.pdf
DOC451.pdf
DOC452.pdf
DOC453.pdf
DOC454.pdf
DOC455.pdf
DOC456.pdf
DOC457.pdf
DOC458.pdf
DOC459.pdf
DOC460.pdf
DOC461.pdf
DOC462.pdf
DOC463.pdf
DOC464.pdf
DOC465.pdf
DOC466.pdf
DOC467.pdf
DOC468.pdf
DOC469.pdf
DOC470.pdf
DOC471.pdf
DOC472.pdf
DOC473.pdf
DOC474.pdf
DOC475.pdf
DOC476.pdf
DOC477.pdf
DOC478.pdf
DOC479.pdf
DOC480.pdf
DOC481.pdf
DOC482.pdf
DOC483.pdf
DOC484.pdf
DOC485.pdf
DOC486.pdf
DOC487.pdf
DOC488.pdf
DOC489.pdf
DOC490.pdf
DOC491.pdf
DOC492.pdf
DOC493.pdf
DOC494.pdf
DOC495.pdf
DOC496.pdf
DOC497.pdf
DOC498.pdf
DOC499.pdf
DOC500.pdf
DOC501.pdf
DOC502.pdf
DOC503.pdf
DOC504.pdf
DOC505.pdf
DOC506.pdf
DOC507.pdf
DOC508.pdf
DOC509.pdf
DOC510.pdf
DOC511.pdf
DOC512.pdf
DOC513.pdf
DOC514.pdf
DOC515.pdf
DOC516.pdf
DOC517.pdf
DOC518.pdf
DOC519.pdf
DOC520.pdf
DOC521.pdf
DOC522.pdf
DOC523.pdf
DOC524.pdf
DOC525.pdf
DOC526.pdf
DOC527.pdf
DOC528.pdf
DOC529.pdf
DOC530.pdf
DOC531.pdf
DOC532.pdf
DOC533.pdf
DOC534.pdf
DOC535.pdf
DOC536.pdf
DOC537.pdf
DOC538.pdf
DOC539.pdf
DOC540.pdf
DOC541.pdf
DOC542.pdf
DOC543.pdf
DOC544.pdf
DOC545.pdf
DOC546.pdf
DOC547.pdf
DOC548.pdf
DOC549.pdf
DOC550.pdf
DOC551.pdf
DOC552.pdf
DOC553.pdf
DOC554.pdf
DOC555.pdf
DOC556.pdf
DOC557.pdf
DOC558.pdf
DOC559.pdf
DOC560.pdf
DOC561.pdf
DOC562.pdf
DOC563.pdf
DOC564.pdf
DOC565.pdf
DOC566.pdf
DOC567.pdf
DOC568.pdf
DOC569.pdf
DOC570.pdf
DOC571.pdf
DOC572.pdf
DOC573.pdf
DOC574.pdf
DOC575.pdf
DOC576.pdf
DOC577.pdf
DOC578.pdf
DOC579.pdf
DOC000.pdf
DOC001.pdf
DOC002.pdf
DOC003.pdf
DOC004.pdf
DOC005.pdf
DOC006.pdf
DOC007.pdf
DOC008.pdf
DOC009.pdf
DOC009.pdf
DOC011.pdf
DOC012.pdf
DOC013.pdf
DOC014.pdf
DOC015.pdf
DOC016.pdf
DOC017.pdf
DOC018.pdf
DOC019.pdf
DOC020.pdf
DOC021.pdf
DOC022.pdf
DOC023.pdf
DOC024.pdf
DOC025.pdf
DOC026.pdf
DOC027.pdf
DOC028.pdf
DOC029.pdf
DOC030.pdf
DOC031.pdf
DOC032.pdf
DOC033.pdf
DOC034.pdf
DOC035.pdf
DOC036.pdf
DOC037.pdf
DOC038.pdf
DOC039.pdf
DOC040.pdf
DOC041.pdf
DOC042.pdf
DOC043.pdf
DOC044.pdf
DOC045.pdf
DOC046.pdf
DOC047.pdf
DOC048.pdf
DOC049.pdf
DOC050.pdf
DOC051.pdf
DOC052.pdf
DOC053.pdf
DOC054.pdf
DOC055.pdf
DOC056.pdf
DOC057.pdf
1996_240228170402_001.pdf
doc06531620240312130422.pdf
doc06531720240312130720.pdf
doc06531820240312131052.pdf
doc06531920240312131546.pdf
doc06532020240312132046.pdf
doc06532220240312132155.pdf
doc06532320240312132803.pdf
doc06532420240312132938.pdf
doc06532520240312133110.pdf
doc06532620240312133444.pdf
doc06532720240312133513.pdf
doc06533720240312154604.pdf
doc06533820240312154930.pdf
doc06535420240312165701.pdf
doc06535520240312165955.pdf
doc06535620240312170737.pdf
doc06535720240312171008.pdf
doc06535820240312171821.pdf
doc06535920240312172124.pdf
doc06536220240312174559.pdf
doc06536320240312174838.pdf
doc06536420240312175114.pdf
doc06536620240312175211.pdf
doc06536820240312181342.pdf
doc06536920240312181807.pdf
doc06537020240312182053.pdf
doc06537120240312182523.pdf
doc06537220240312182819.pdf
doc06537320240312183348.pdf
doc06537420240312183705.pdf
doc06538620240313092158.pdf
doc06538820240313093035.pdf
doc06538920240313093603.pdf
doc06539020240313094041.pdf
doc06539120240313094446.pdf
doc06539220240313095010.pdf
doc06539320240313095221.pdf
doc06539420240313095435.pdf
doc06539520240313095927.pdf
doc06539620240313100034.pdf
doc06539720240313100635.pdf
doc06539820240313100807.pdf
doc06539920240313101144.pdf
doc06540020240313101359.pdf
doc06542720240313130706.pdf
doc06542920240313131246.pdf
doc06544220240313150025.pdf
doc06544320240313150140.pdf
doc06544420240313150549.pdf
doc06544520240313150912.pdf
doc06544620240313151209.pdf
doc06544720240313151517.pdf
doc06544820240313151723.pdf
doc06545220240313152335.pdf
doc06545320240313152838.pdf
doc06545420240313153152.pdf
doc06545520240313153540.pdf
doc06545620240313153946.pdf
doc06551220240314110749.pdf
doc06551320240314111323.pdf
doc06551420240314111539.pdf
doc06551720240314114052.pdf
doc06551820240314114241.pdf
doc06552120240314114856.pdf
doc06552220240314115019.pdf
doc06552320240314115406.pdf
doc06552720240314120338.pdf
doc06553020240314121753.pdf
doc06553220240314122246.pdf
doc06553420240314122822.pdf
doc06553820240314122958.pdf
doc06553820240314122958.pdf
doc06553920240314123506.pdf
doc06554120240314123658.pdf
doc06554320240314123939.pdf
doc06554520240314124333.pdf
doc06557320240315095700.pdf
doc06557420240315100041.pdf
doc06557520240315100354.pdf
doc06557620240315100610.pdf
doc06559120240315115825.pdf
doc06562820240315124643.pdf
doc06562920240315125313.pdf
doc06563020240315125521.pdf
doc06563120240315125701.pdf
doc06563420240315130531.pdf
doc06563520240315130841.pdf
doc06563720240315131157.pdf
doc06564120240315131724.pdf
doc06564320240315132314.pdf
doc06564520240315132543.pdf
doc06564620240315133035.pdf
doc06564720240315133330.pdf
doc06564820240315133811.pdf
doc06564920240315134043.pdf
doc06565020240315134220.pdf
doc06565120240315134438.pdf
doc06565220240315134839.pdf
doc06565320240315135114.pdf
doc06565620240315135541.pdf
doc06565820240315135844.pdf
doc06565920240315140149.pdf
doc06566020240315140444.pdf
doc06566220240315140806.pdf
doc06566420240315141952.pdf
doc06566820240318093041.pdf
doc06566920240318093318.pdf
doc06567020240318093704.pdf
doc06568020240318112332.pdf
doc06568120240318113055.pdf
doc06568220240318113239.pdf
doc06568320240318113408.pdf
doc06568420240318113727.pdf
doc06568520240318113907.pdf
doc06568720240318114748.pdf
doc06568820240318115038.pdf
doc06568920240318115228.pdf
doc06569020240318115358.pdf
doc06569120240318115553.pdf
doc06569220240318115841.pdf
doc06569420240318120128.pdf
doc06569520240318120322.pdf
doc06569620240318120649.pdf
doc06569720240318120836.pdf
doc06569820240318121048.pdf
doc06569920240318121607.pdf
doc06570020240318121742.pdf
doc06570120240318121910.pdf
doc06594020240322095620.pdf
doc06594120240322100618.pdf
doc06595320240322105140.pdf
doc06629720240401125846.pdf
doc06629920240401130101.pdf
doc06631020240401135304.pdf
doc06631120240401135609.pdf
doc06631220240401135828.pdf
doc06631420240401140447.pdf
doc06631720240401141226.pdf
doc06631620240401140729.pdf
doc06631920240401142013.pdf
doc06632020240401142233.pdf
doc06632120240401142503.pdf
doc06632220240401142718.pdf
doc06632320240401142944.pdf
doc06643520240403111044.pdf
doc06643620240403111243.pdf
doc06643920240403111618.pdf
doc06644120240403114907.pdf
doc06644220240403115259.pdf
doc06644320240403115347.pdf
doc06644420240403115643.pdf
doc06644520240403115824.pdf
doc06644620240403120011.pdf
doc06644720240403120356.pdf
doc06644920240403122233.pdf
doc06645020240403122317.pdf
doc06645120240403122504.pdf
doc06645220240403122846.pdf
doc06664620240409091913.pdf
doc06664720240409092201.pdf
doc06664820240409092507.pdf
doc06664920240409093010.pdf
doc06665020240409093310.pdf
doc06665120240409093412.pdf
doc06665420240409103428.pdf
doc06665720240409103905.pdf
doc06665820240409104205.pdf
doc06665920240409104531.pdf
doc06666020240409104835.pdf
doc06666120240409105403.pdf
doc06666220240409105514.pdf
doc06666320240409110034.pdf
doc06682620240411133710.pdf
doc06682720240411134539.pdf
doc06682820240411135038.pdf
doc06682920240411135058.pdf
doc06683020240411135533.pdf
doc06683120240411135607.pdf
doc06683220240411140141.pdf
doc06683320240411140424.pdf
doc06683420240411141043.pdf
doc06683520240411141121.pdf
doc06683620240411142059.pdf
doc06683720240411142121.pdf
doc06683820240411142637.pdf
doc06683920240411142700.pdf
doc06684020240411143301.pdf
doc06724920240422095803.pdf
doc06725020240422100153.pdf
doc06725120240422100528.pdf
doc06725220240422100830.pdf
doc06725320240422101124.pdf
doc06725420240422101350.pdf
doc06725520240422101603.pdf
doc06725720240422102709.pdf
doc06725820240422103001.pdf
doc06725920240422103235.pdf
doc06726020240422103404.pdf
doc06727120240422113523.pdf
doc06727220240422113658.pdf
doc06727320240422113811.pdf
doc06727420240422113851.pdf
doc06727820240422132537.pdf
doc06727920240422132755.pdf
doc06728020240422133012.pdf
doc06745420240424125949.pdf
doc06745520240424131601.pdf
doc06745720240424132002.pdf
doc06747420240424140751.pdf
DOC062.pdf
DOC063.pdf
DOC064.pdf
DOC065.pdf
DOC066.pdf
DOC067.pdf
DOC068.pdf
DOC069.pdf
DOC070.pdf
DOC071.pdf
DOC072.pdf
DOC073.pdf
DOC074.pdf
DOC075.pdf
DOC076.pdf
DOC077.pdf
DOC078.pdf
DOC079.pdf
DOC080.pdf
DOC081.pdf
DOC082.pdf
DOC083.pdf
DOC084.pdf
DOC085.pdf
DOC086.pdf
DOC087.pdf
DOC088.pdf
DOC089.pdf
DOC090.pdf
DOC091.pdf
DOC092.pdf
DOC093.pdf
DOC094.pdf
DOC096.pdf
DOC097.pdf
DOC098.pdf
DOC099.pdf
DOC101.pdf
DOC102.pdf
DOC103.pdf
DOC104.pdf
DOC106.pdf
DOC107.pdf
DOC108.pdf
DOC109.pdf
DOC111.pdf
DOC112.pdf
DOC113.pdf
DOC114.pdf
DOC116.pdf
DOC117.pdf
DOC120.pdf
DOC121.pdf
DOC122.pdf
DOC123.pdf
DOC124.pdf
5. Carte de identitate Dumitrescu Aurel.png
gojek.jpg
Assignee (Direct Manager)
- Niciuna -
Marius Dumitrache
marius.dumitrache
Moderator
teodora.tache
Response (Direct Manager)
Text metadata
Taburi verticale